Phenom Talent Experience Management (TXM) Platform vs. TurboHire

Phenom TXM provides an easy-to-use, well-flowing landing page to front our ATS (SmartRecruiters). It integrates well with SR and enables potential candidates to view our open roles across multiple locations, job types, and skill levels. It allows them to sign up to receive notifications based on their preferred criteria, and they can also save job listings they're interested in. Once set up, ideally, it works well. Any edits required are slow and costly - engaging with representatives from Phenom and resolving queries is time-consuming and usually requires multiple follow-ups. Because Phenom centrally controls the site, we're unable to make even small edits quickly.

Incentivized

A great alternative in the market to use for recruitment. It is really very helpful for the leadership team to track and find the right resources. It can be integrated with another page also. Provides flexible connectivity. Includes simple process. So good at keeping candidate details in the database, their experience also.

Incentivized

• Role grouping into categories.
• Web page design & flow.
• Easy to use.
• SmartRecruiters integration.

Incentivized

• User friendly User Interface
• Cost effective
• making pipeline of candidates in a great way.

Incentivized

• Reports turnaround times could be improved
• Can't change candidates statuses in bulk
• Slow customer service turnaround at times

Incentivized

• While adding a resume in the ATS, very often the resume is not read and had to re do it. It sometimes ask to put the resume in a particular format which is annoying.
• Turbohire is missing one major feature of detailed reports of the candidates. The weekly and monthly reports really helps in keeping a track on the pipeline and performance, which should be added.
• Sometimes it won't show a candidate while searching from emailid or mobile number, which creates duplicity.

Incentivized

Candidate usability is fairly straightforward and the platform is easy to engage with. There are multiple ways to search and filter roles, including status, location (including city/individual location, as well as DC/Store/Head Office, etc.), role type, and department. Usability from a website management perspective is lacking due to the centrality of control over the content.

Incentivized

When comparing Phenom Talent Experience Management to Avature CRM: Avature aims very high, and sometimes gets lost in its own grandness. Phenom Talent Experience Management tends to be more user-friendly and accessible, with some more down to Earth features and functionalities. On the other hand, Avature allows for managing candidates in bulk, which is not an option for Phenom Talent Experience Management. When comparing Phenom Talent Experience Management to SmartRecruiters: the choice for Phenom Talent Experience Management was made once the decision had been made on investing on EB campaigns and building a talent community, as Phenom Talent Experience Management's capabilities are much better and broader.

Incentivized

The major decisive factors for us when we were looking for an ATS were cost and easy to use ATS as we were in the transition phase. Turbohire was cheaper and had easy user interface and didn't require any additional trainings on using ATS. The demo given by Turbohire was enough to understand its functions.

Incentivized

• Increased candidate engagement
• Broad customisation is leading to more sophisticated campaigns which should increase ROI
• Reports could benefit from some TLC, data integrity has been a concern

Incentivized

• Turbohire is relatively cheaper comparing to other few similar software available in the market.
• It's cost effective ATS to start with and to get shifted to an ATS from traditional methods of Excel or sheets.
• Pretty simple to use, so the transition is really smooth and hassle free.
• Overall Turbohire is having positive impact on ROI, advisable for small and medium sized companies.

Incentivized