PaperCut vs. Tungsten Capture

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PaperCut
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
PaperCut Software headquartered in Melbourne offers their suite of print and output management solutions including PaperCut NG as well as embedded software to supply hardware integration.
$425
One Time Fee
Tungsten Capture
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Tungsten Capture (formerly Kofax Capture) is a suite of multichannel document capture applications.
$3,500
per year
Pricing
PaperCutTungsten Capture
Editions & Modules
25 Users
$425.00
One Time Fee
75 Users
$605.00
One Time Fee
150 Users
$840.00
One Time Fee
Kofax Capture
$3,500
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PaperCutTungsten Capture
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PaperCutTungsten Capture
Best Alternatives
PaperCutTungsten Capture
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PaperCutTungsten Capture
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.3
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PaperCutTungsten Capture
Likelihood to Recommend
PaperCut is well suited in an environment where paper usage is overdone. In the marketing and advertising industry, lots of paper is wasted due to visual usage like presentations of client show-casings. It is less appropriate for a workplace that only uses digital work rather than any print. Otherwise very useful.
Read full review
If there is a desire to extract text from emails, documents, spreadsheets, and faxes this is the perfect platform for that. The only thing it does, extracting information, it does well. External information in terms of flat files, databases, and web services can be tied into the platform as well to allow line item matching, address validation, and other features that make it just an overall great ingestion system.
Read full review
Pros
  • Run reports to view print usage by department, employee, site, etc.
  • Helpful in capturing trends.
Read full review
  • One of the things we relied on Kofax was its connector with Oracle UCM and Filenet. It was easy to configure batch classes and set up release scripts to UCM or Filent
  • One other aspect of it was validation scripts based on external Oracle databases. It was very helpful.
  • After removal of dongle, it became easier to maintain the software.
Read full review
Cons
  • The initial set up is a bit of a burden, and isn't truly user-friendly.
  • The web print feature can get hung-up some times and there isn't a way to cancel when a job is "processing."
  • The MacBook top bar item isn't always stable.
Read full review
  • Kofax Capture's interface is antiquated and could use a refresh. An attempt was made two versions back to add ribbons and modernize the interface but anything below the first level looks and feels like a tired application.
  • Bugs that have existed in the platform for years are still prevalent and there is no priority to fix them. Features and critical bugs are regularly fixed but simple nagging ones that can cause a development project to close and lose all work is commonplace.
  • Licensing, while reasonable for lower volume solutions, becomes expensive once a project reaches a certain threshold. Ensure future planning capacity is done before purchasing to make sure it's a cost effective solution.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It's good.
Read full review
Support Rating
We use a local company to support our PaperCut implementation. They have been fantastic with any request we've had over the years. For the most part the issues we have had were simple enough and were often solved by a driver or application update. PaperCut has been nothing less than reliable.
Read full review
Haven't really used their support yet
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
PaperCut was more user friendly for our higher ed situation and had a great sales pitch from the reseller we got it from.
Read full review
Kofax Capture was less expensive than the IBM product and was easier to use than both IBM and Amazon in my opinion. The unlimited scripting of Kofax Capture allowed us to fully integrate the tool into our business processes to improve our automation and reduce errors. We also looked at a product from Nuance but at the time decided to eliminate it from our evaluation.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The biggest ROI impact would be that we are saving money every year by printing less and less.
  • As part of moving towards this centralized model, we no longer purchase new printers.
  • The only negative was the initial push back from users that have been printing to local printers for years and years. This is something that will obviously go away over time.
Read full review
  • We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.
Read full review
ScreenShots