Oracle Textura Payment Management vs. Tipalti

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
A construction payment management application that helps general contractors, owners, and subcontractors simplify and automate the draw process. Reduces risk by securely managing lien waivers and compliance. Increases visibility to downstream payments to minimize the risk of disruption and ensure the entire supply chain is paid on time for work completed.N/A
Tipalti
Score 8.7 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Tipalti automates critical financial processes to drive efficiency, including accounts payable, mass payments, procurement, and expenses, all on one global finance automation platform that grows with the organization, automating, de-risking and simplifying finance.N/A
Pricing
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementTipalti
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementTipalti
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsPricing starts at $149 per month for the platform fee. Users can upgrade to Tipalti's more advanced capabilities as their businesses gets more complex. The Tipalti pricing model is designed to grow with the user's company. Advanced features such as W-8 tax forms, international tax IDs, or multi-entity payables are available as needed.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementTipalti
Features
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementTipalti
Accounts Receivable
Comparison of Accounts Receivable features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Textura Payment Management
9.8
Ratings
0% above category average
Tipalti
-
Ratings
Invoice Control10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Payment Tracking9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Reminders10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Payment Reconciliation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dispute Resolution10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Payment Management
Comparison of Payment Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Textura Payment Management
-
Ratings
Tipalti
9.1
Ratings
19% above category average
Customizable Approval Policies00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Financial Document Management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Payment Status Tracking00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Payment Audit Trail00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Duplicate Bill Detection00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Advanced OCR00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Electronic Funds Transfer00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Accounts Payable
Comparison of Accounts Payable features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Textura Payment Management
-
Ratings
Tipalti
8.2
Ratings
21% above category average
Automated Accounts Payable Processes00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Vendor Management00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Tax Form Preparation00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementTipalti
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Accounting Seed
Accounting Seed
Score 6.3 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
BlackLine
BlackLine
Score 8.8 out of 10
Webexpenses
Webexpenses
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementTipalti
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementTipalti
Likelihood to Recommend
For a GC that wants to make things easier for both the themselves and all subs, this is absolutely the best solution out there. Some GCs still approve changes using purchase orders rather than change orders and allow invoicing to occur at any time during the month However, they should change their process to align with Oracle Textura Payment Management's draws. Without a draw process and confirmed invoice submission along with ACH payments, we have had invoices lost, payments lost, and time lost from having to track all of it. I can't think of a reason it would not be appropriate.
Read full review
The invoice processing element is far, far easier than manually inputting invoices are we were doing previously. The OCR is not perfect, but having it scanned in and ready for review saves a lot of time. The approvals process is fast and effective, and approvers can approve directly from the email without having even to log into the system. The audit trail function allows the finance team to see exactly who has done what to each invoice, and when. Payments, however, are where we see the most benefit. Vendor bank details are stored securely and controls can be put in place to ensure that any changes to vendor data must be approved. Once fully approved, invoices can be scheduled for payment either on a particular date or on the invoice due date, which ensures vendors are paid on a 'Just In Time' basis. All invoices and payments sync seamlessly to our ERP each day.
Read full review
Pros
  • AIA Billing
  • ACH Payments
  • SOV Management
  • Communications
  • User Management
  • Compliance Holds
Read full review
  • Support is phenomenal! Incredibly responsive, always have the answers, super knowledgeable and will assist in bringing resolution to various concerns, as well, providing not just support, but education as well!
  • System is almost always working efficiently, very few incidents that slow me down.
  • System is incredibly user friendly. I was able to learn it pretty quickly.
Read full review
Cons
  • Task Management needs a "Mark all as Read" or similar function. They pile up per job and are only able to be completed using certain links and processes.
  • Payment Notification emails should include payment details including amount(s), joint check info, and check numbers.
  • Projects should be able to be removed or archived by the subcontractor. We have jobs showing on our home page that are 3+ years since completion.
  • Retention billing is very confusing and should be communicated more clearly. There should also be a button that allows for all retention to be billed at once rather than having to type in the amount per line item.
  • Sub-Tiers should not be a menu to click through if there are no sub-tiers for a sub.
Read full review
  • In the PO matching queue, there is some clunkiness surrounding updating PO lines. For example, if you need to delete PO lines picked up from the invoice, you currently have to delete each line individually, instead of being able to select multiple and delete.
  • Sometimes PO numbers do not properly pick up from the OCR system. For example, the OCR might pick up "PO 18535" instead of "18535". This causes the AP team to have to manually link the PO, creating an extra step.
  • For PO-backed Invoices that require you to manually type in the PO amount, there is no option to save your inputs. If there are any changes to the match details (i.e. linking another PO, or unlinking a PO) all inputs are reset to blank.
  • If there are non PO line items for an invoice that is in the PO matching queue, there is no option to select a separate department code for that line item.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Solid system performance. Suits our needs and solution provider very inclined to accept feedback and involve users in developing the solution to serve both the provider and the ultimate user. Tipalti has streamlined our process that was previously very manual and prone to error. Now there is transparency of information and role.
Read full review
Usability
Although there are minor improvements to be made, Oracle Textura Payment Management is far and away the easiest payment solution out there for any invoicing procedure that requires monthly draws.
Read full review
The system is incredibly easy to use, with most tasks being completed in a small number of clicks. The user interface is very user intuitive and can be navigated very easily. Multiple payments can be made instantaneously and as the vendors manage their payable account we are able to ensure that payments are being sent to the right account. The advanced functionality for duplicate invoices ensures that we are not processing bills twice and we have found that in 100% of cases it has identified a duplicate bill.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Tipalti has always been responsive to our questions and concerns.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
No issues here. Generally has been pretty fast.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Since I also work in customer support, I often have to contact Tipalti's team with questions from our users. Tipalti's support team has always been exceptionally helpful and it was a pleasure to communicate with them. I have always received prompt responses to any inquiries and they are excellent at solving our customers' issues within a short time
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Tipalti provides great How to online guide
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Implementation went smooth as we used and tested everything in the sandbox first
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Oracle Textura Payment Management is better and more refined than similar products. Procore has a ton of other useful features and GCPay is straightforward with a simple UI. Like most things in tech, it comes down to user base and Oracle Textura Payment Management has the most jobs of ours using it meaning it has the biggest positive impact on our business.
Read full review
Both of these products have treated us well and have their pros and cons. We do a lot of acquisitions though and they are just not friendly the more and more you go. Tipalti has been very helpful with the more we grow. Its a key part in integrating finances
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We were given the option of only one integration.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Oracle Textura Payment Management has dramatically improved our AR process (when the GC uses it). We wish that every job used it so we wouldn't have to deal with the dozens of builder-specific invoicing processes each month. Before Oracle Textura Payment Management, each builder had specific process we had to follow in order to get paid. After GCs started to use it, we have been able to consolidate multiple clients and jobs into a single easy-to-learn and easy-to-teach process that allows us to submit invoices easily and track when we are going to get paid.
Read full review
  • in my Corporate Controller capacity, I have total visibility of all invoices within the organization
  • total staff time spent on the AP process will decrease easily 75% or more
  • I have a small staff. Even during PTO of my staff member, I can do necessary AP items, start to finish, in minutes, 100% remotely
Read full review
ScreenShots

Tipalti Screenshots

Screenshot of Intelligent invoicing workflowScreenshot of Mobile approvals for invoices and paymentsScreenshot of Brandable self-service supplier portal (including handling tax forms)Screenshot of Brandable self-service portal to collect and validate payment detailsScreenshot of Combined payment methods, currencies, and entities in a single payment fileScreenshot of an early payment, which can be offered to suppliers through email or the supplier portal