An enterprise grade CRM solution featuring customization and integration capabilities, and an open architecture for a personalized user experience. It can be deployed either on-premises or in the cloud.
N/A
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Score 5.3 out of 10
N/A
Sugar Sell from SugarCRM is a collaborative CRM, allowing users to track and monitor activities, map each customer’s journey. Sugar Sell replaces former editions of the SugarCRM product, including the SugarCRM Community Edition, the open source edition, which is discontinued.
$19
per month (billed annually) per user (3 user minimum, 9 user maximum)
Pricing
Oracle Siebel CRM
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essentials
$19
per month (billed annually) per user (3 user minimum, 9 user maximum)
Standard
$59
per month (billed annually) per user (10 User Minimum)
Advanced
$85
per month (billed annually) per user (10 user minimum)
Premier
$135
per month (billed annually) per user (10 user minimum)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle Siebel CRM
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle Siebel CRM
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Features
Oracle Siebel CRM
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Siebel CRM
8.8
Ratings
13% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
4.8
Ratings
46% below category average
Customer data management / contact management
9.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Workflow management
9.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Territory management
9.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Opportunity management
9.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
6.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Contract management
9.30 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Quote & order management
8.70 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Interaction tracking
10.00 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
9.30 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Siebel CRM
9.1
Ratings
19% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
2.3
Ratings
106% below category average
Case management
8.70 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Call center management
10.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Help desk management
8.70 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Siebel CRM
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
5.5
Ratings
32% below category average
Lead management
8.90 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Email marketing
7.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Siebel CRM
8.4
Ratings
10% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
3.0
Ratings
87% below category average
Task management
8.70 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
8.30 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Reporting
8.30 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Siebel CRM
7.3
Ratings
4% below category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
3.3
Ratings
79% below category average
Forecasting
8.00 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
7.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Customizable reports
7.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Siebel CRM
9.6
Ratings
25% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
5.5
Ratings
31% below category average
Custom fields
10.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Custom objects
10.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Scripting environment
8.20 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
API for custom integration
10.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Siebel CRM
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
5.5
Ratings
41% below category average
Single sign-on capability
10.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Siebel CRM
6.8
Ratings
8% below category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
3.0
Ratings
84% below category average
Social data
6.80 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Social engagement
6.80 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Siebel CRM
10.0
Ratings
31% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
4.5
Ratings
48% below category average
Marketing automation
10.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Compensation management
10.00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Product A and Product B
Throughout the time that we have used it, Oracle has provided a full on pipeline of solutions and account planning which increases the services of marketing, accounting and finance. We notice that with sales it was simply a breakthrough, allowing us to make better decisions with real-time view and proactive communication to get the job done. No dislikes for this software at all
The way Community Tax uses Sugar from a users point of view is, it can house a lot of information for either a company or individual with the option of adding additional sub cases . The down side is there are licenses issued per user and 1 per user is not enough because most of the time we are multitasking. Therefore a program/software would be more suitable instead of using a URL.
Lack of documentation for developers -- it feels like almost nothing in the grand scheme of things, especially around OpenUI. Sure there are some things on bookshelf, but that's all it is, some. It's not in depth--there are hardly any examples and I generally get answers outside of bookshelf.
Support isn't so good, I'd sooner try to solve the problem with many workarounds than put a support ticket in that might go into the abyss and never get resolved.
The user interface is lacking for our version. Granted, we are at least four years behind and have no mobile responsiveness (we had to build that ourselves) but I've seen the newer version and there need to be more intuitive user interface patterns in general
Sometimes there are weird quirks in customizations that should work in theory, but don't.
Our organization will continue to use Sugar as long as it remains cost effective and it addresses the majority of our needs. I will, however, recommend looking into other options once our needs increase and there is additional budget for some bigger named and more robust platform options. I feel if the application was friendlier to end users we would get better productivity as well.
Oracle Siebel CRM is an older Sales CRM, so many of it's features aren't as current as ones used today. However, it has a smoother and easy-to-use UI. We're glad that we can still access Oracle Siebel CRM because it's easier to find older information that we can't easily find in our Salesforce Lightning CRM tool.
In the overall usage of the system I still give it a 10 out 10 because it's our day to day system that we use here at work. We all have come to love it because it's quick and easy to use. New updates are given to us by our supervisors or managers and it's easy to do new things in the system. The only Issue like I said before that I'm having is that once I put a payment date and want to modify the dates, it will only allow me to eliminate the date but not put a new one back in.
We no longer have support for our Oracle Siebel CRM. When we did, the support was slow to get some things fixed, therefore, there was a lot of downtime. Of course, this slowed down our overall productivity and increased our overall frustration with the tool. However, it would be nice if we still had some support with it since we still do access it from time to time.
Because it provides us with the necessary support and with the updates that are being made in the system, it allows us to improve our work experience and makes it easier for the entire team. When requesting some type of support it is effective and immediate and with this, it [does not] stagnate our productivity.
We feel clasroom training is essential to ensure user adoption and buy-in. Video and on-line training courses gave their place but being in a classroom setting enables the Team to make any potential CRM issues visble right up front.
Study, study, and study. Be prepared to train everyday until all processes are flowing nicely. The CRM is the elephant and figuring out where to take the first bite can be a challenge. But there is only one way to eat this elephant, one bite at a time. Systematic planning is very important.
Siebel is quite a bit slower in performance and lacks support for modern browsers, in contrast to Salesforce.com. It's also much less searchable and discoverable (with regard to insights) and lacks a fresh look. I'm not privy to all the reasons why our organization moved away from Siebel CRM, but I'm glad we did.
SugarCRM does not stack up well against Bloomreach; we moved away from SugarCRM to Bloomreach, which was much more suited and easily integrated into many different platforms. Bloomreach has a much nicer user interface for debugging and simpler screens for less technical audiences to utilize 3rd. Party support is rarely required, and lots of easy-to-understand documentation is available.
Very positive impact: replacing multiple silo applications based on outdated technology
Provide data integrity by eliminating redundancy and the use of audit trails
Improves safety of users on the field: use of tracking tool and providing list of hazards
Thanks to the multi-org feature of the Siebel CRM, after a first successful implementation we were able to package the solution and offer it to multiple other customers, with minimum changes.
I know that SugarCRM has made a positive impact on my day to day work. Since we have made the change to SugarCRM (over a year ago) it has made life easier, more productive, and efficient.
Organization is key and this CRM has done this exceptionally for me.