Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. QAD Adaptive ERP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
An ERP primarily aimed at medium-sized companies that combines financial management capabilities contain the familiar general ledger along with expense management, accounts payable and receivable (AP/AR), advanced cost accounting, and fixed asset accounting.N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…N/A
Pricing
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Features
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
33% above category average
Pay calculation9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
API for custom integration8.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Plug-ins8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.5
Ratings
4% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Single sign-on capability9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.7
Ratings
6% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
32% above category average
Dashboards7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standard reports8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Custom reports8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
Ratings
7% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
26% above category average
Accounts payable7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.9
Ratings
0% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.3
Ratings
16% above category average
Inventory tracking7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location management10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
Ratings
9% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Pricing8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Order entry9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Credit card processing6.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold8.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
Ratings
7% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Billing Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
Ratings
6% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.8
Ratings
24% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.4
Ratings
0% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
Ratings
1% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared4.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.6
Ratings
15% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Risk Repository8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
Ratings
4% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management5.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
Ratings
6% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.2
Ratings
22% above category average
Production Process Design4.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Production Management4.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Configuration Management8.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Work Execution9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.3
Ratings
12% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.3
Ratings
15% above category average
Forecasting5.40 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Inventory Planning8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
Ratings
11% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Proposal Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
If there are lot of complicated systems this might not be the best system. If you have only some complexity Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a product a technical or application person can wrap their hands around and understand the whole system.
Read full review
Suited very well for small to medium sized organizations as it provides you everything you can expect from an ERP (without any fancy bells and whistles that SAP and some of the other ERPs provide). Works well with a lean IT organization, as the configuration and ongoing maintenance and/or analysis is pretty straightforward.
Read full review
Pros
  • JD Edwards is very configurable in handling different sales order entry scenarios.
  • JD Edwards can be customized to present focused information on the login screen of a user so a user can better focus on the applications or reports that are relevant to their job.
  • JD Edwards is also very effective in creating relationships between various customer accounts and the relationships between them.
Read full review
  • The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
  • The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
  • The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
Read full review
Cons
  • The interface is aging - The application has been around quite a while. Even with the more modern UI, it still feels like a 90's application and doesn't provide the quick augmentation options like what is found in Netsuite or cloud apps.
  • A premise based - It's an application that was built to run on mini/mainframe environments, which were great for its time. However, in comparison to the hand's free environments in the cloud, it requires more iron and humans to maintain the solution.
  • Speed to roll out new business models - It felt like, once you deployed a business setup, it was difficult to change and add new business features, especially those that contradict previous directions.
Read full review
  • As a user and who managed the application, I have longed for a module that you don't have to go thru the entire frame to go to a certain field. They have addressed this issue on their recent release by going to a web frame.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
Read full review
Usability
great design and continuous improvements
Read full review
Easy to use, zero or minimum cost to maintain the database (DBA etc) , no issue with OS ( Linux), stable database
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
It is simple to use and implement as compared to complex softwares in the market that may take ample amount of time to implement. The budget is also slightly less to provide the same functionality that other softwares are providing. Also having Oracle database that comes with the system is much easier to handle and use and have much security.
Read full review
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The EnterpriseOne toolset is flexible and easily usable. Since they continue to invest and grow the product, we do get a good ROI out of it.
  • The software was already here and installed when I started at this company but the business users seemed to really like it and adapt to it well so it must feed the need to manage our inventory and financials, etc.
Read full review
  • ROI - very high with QAD.
  • Yearly maintenance cost is very low.
  • Support is very good from the QAD customer service team, knowledge base web site.
  • Very quick to implement the system.
Read full review
ScreenShots