TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Oracle CPQ

    Score1 out of 10
    N/AOracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.

    $240

    per month per user

    QorusDocs

    N/A
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Qorus Breeze Proposals is a sales proposal automation software solution offered by Qorus Software.N/A
    Pricing
    Oracle CPQQorusDocs
    Editions & Modules
    CPQ Pricing
    $240.00
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Oracle CPQQorusDocs
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Oracle CPQQorusDocs
    CPQ
    Comparison of CPQ features of Oracle CPQ and QorusDocs
    Feature
    Oracle CPQ
    6.7
    18 Ratings
    26% below category average
    QorusDocs
    -
    Ratings
    Quote sharing/sending7.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product configuration8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration options8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pricing rules7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Price adjustment5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Purchase history and open contracts6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Guided selling/Sales portal7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    CPQ reporting & analytics7.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    CPQ-CRM integration7.015 Ratings00 Ratings
    Attachments to quotes5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order capturing7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Oracle CPQQorusDocs
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (45 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (26 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    3.0
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    2.0
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Oracle CPQQorusDocs
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QorusDocs
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    Oracle
    • Leveraged automation to minimize headcount costs despite 10% year-over-year business growth, and enabled staff to focus on more strategic tasks.
    • Established a flexible CPQ system that scales on demand to easily accommodate the company’s multiple global locations.
    • Improved customer relations by reducing configuration time and allowing sales more time to meet with customers and close orders.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QorusDocs
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Oracle
    • Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
    • Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
    • Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QorusDocs
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    Oracle
    So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QorusDocs
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Oracle
    The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QorusDocs
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    QorusDocs
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    QorusDocs
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    QorusDocs
    No answers on this topic
    In-Person Training
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    QorusDocs
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    QorusDocs
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
    Read full review
    QorusDocs
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
    • Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
    • A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.
    Read full review
    QorusDocs
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots