OpenText Content Suite Platform vs. Tungsten PaperPort

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Content Suite Platform
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
The OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity.N/A
Tungsten PaperPort
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Tungsten PaperPort (formerly from Kofax and Nuance) is a document management software offering. It includes features such as desktop document management solution and allows you to manage and organize your documents in one solution.
$99
one-time fee per license
Pricing
OpenText Content Suite PlatformTungsten PaperPort
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
PaperPort Standard
$99
one-time fee per license
PaperPort Professional
$199
one-time fee per license
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Content Suite PlatformTungsten PaperPort
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPerpetual license products, there are no subscription or maintenance fees. Buy once, own forever.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Content Suite PlatformTungsten PaperPort
Features
OpenText Content Suite PlatformTungsten PaperPort
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
7.6
6 Ratings
5% below category average
Tungsten PaperPort
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging9.36 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving8.96 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management8.95 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration8.86 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation4.25 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance6.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management9.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows7.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence4.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support4.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Content Suite PlatformTungsten PaperPort
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.5 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
Tungsten Capture
Tungsten Capture
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Content Suite PlatformTungsten PaperPort
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(8 ratings)
8.0
(10 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Content Suite PlatformTungsten PaperPort
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Great for content management and records even for organizations whose staff are not much experienced in the technical backgrounds as it's easy to use and no previous knowledge on HTML is required. It is great for storing invoices and payment proofs and for organizations dealing with global clients for general use documents.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Kofax PaperPort is great for any office that has paper documents - seriously! We have set up multiple businesses to use Kofax PaperPort to cut down their storage of paper receipts, invoices, documents, etc by nearly 90%! Their office is much better organized and they have the ability to edit PDF Documents for a lot cheaper than buying Adobe Acrobat.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Document Management is being done well since it allows you to put in a corporate folder structure that applies to the business unit you currently work in.
  • Records Management works well in this organisation as it allows you to classify the document according to the file plan, as well as manage it according to the retention schedule for tat file plan.
  • The ability to collaborate on files works really well. You can share with users within your group, as well as allow other users access to the files for either read access to read/write access.
  • Access control of the folder and even individual files allows you to ensure only necessary people can have the right type of access. This is especially welcome in the government environment where document management is of utmost importance.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • With Kofax PaperPort, documents can be merged, pages can be extracted from multiple documents and combined to make a new PDF document. It is an important feature as one needs to do it very often and more ubiquitous pdf readers like Adobe Acrobat Reader DC lacks functionalities like these.
  • Kofax PaperPort scans the documents and using it's OCR, converts these scans to searchable PDF documents so that these documents can be searched based on the text content in them.
  • Functionality to convert other formats to PDF and PDF to other formats. This is important as many times , we need to upload certain documents only in a specific format and conversion is required to and from PDF format.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • The user interface and configurability of that interface lack a lot of flexibility and modern tools.
  • There needs to be stronger and more powerful integration to electronic forms and workflow capabilities which are core to modern ECM.
  • Management of audit and content history needs to be modernized and made more dynamic and sustainable.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • It should have a back button, so if you go from one folder to the next, it would be simple to get back to the first folder.
  • When you combine two PDFs, it should retain the title of the one that's on top.
  • The send to bar should be easier to change.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
The staff is comfortable with it and I doubt they'd change at this point.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
PaperPort has a few quirks, but it is the only program of its kind that actually does what it claims to do. The power of it is so much more than they claim especially when it comes to trying to achieve a truly paperless office. With PDF editing built-in, it also saves considerable investment in other PDF editing programs.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
Strong for Core Content and Records Management
Effective for Non-Technical Users (with the right configuration)
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
For us, it's only focusing processes that we're already doing... creating folders, placing scanned files into those folders, then searching for and opening up those files later, as needed. It just helps us view everything in one place - very convenient. Further, being able to drag non-native files to their corresponding source app for editing (Word, Excel, etc) is pretty nice.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
OpenText
I never had any issues with access internally or via VPN. But, the response via VPN, was a bit slow.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
No answers on this topic
Performance
OpenText
  • I used OpenText nearly every day and I never had any performance issues that I can recall. That said, it's not terribly fast either.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
OpenText has an outstanding support and knowledge base. All problems which couldn't be solved by us (high complexity cases) were promptly resolved and the resolution also shared with us.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
OpenText
No, it's pretty easy to implement and use.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Having used OpenText Content Suite for a long time, I can say it stands the competition. It offers many versions which is unlike many products in its category. Also, while it is not affordable, I believe the cost is justified considering what a business can achieve with this software.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
I was ecstatic to see someone moving PaperPort away from Nuance (Those in my circle of friends refer to them as Nuisance). The lack of customer involvement by Nuance made finding answers to things that sometimes irritate a user to being downright frustrating. Maybe the purchase of Nuance by Microsoft will allow the company to focus more on the customer.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • With OpenText Content Suite, we can easily keep documents safe
  • Document collaboration is easy with OpenText
  • We can easily handle invoicing and automation thanks to features such as content capture and imaging.
  • With OpenText Content Suite, there is better file sync and archiving
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • Simple focus on organization of files
  • Efficient later, when searching for files
  • Convenient throughout the office, as we're all accessing a shared data store
Read full review
ScreenShots