OpenRoads Designer vs. Rhino 3D

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenRoads Designer
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Bentley Systems offers OpenRoads Designer, their civil engineering and design platform which replaces the former GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite, InRoads, MX, and PowerCivil.N/A
Rhino
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Robert McNeel and Associates headquartered in Seattle offers Rhinoceros 3D (or Rhino 3D), a 3D modeling and design application. Rhino can create, edit, analyze, document, render, animate, and translate NURBS curves, surfaces and solids, subdivision geometry (SubD), point clouds, and polygon meshes.
$995
one-time fee
Pricing
OpenRoads DesignerRhino 3D
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Rhino 3D for Windows & Mac
$995
one-time fee
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenRoads DesignerRhino
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for students and faculty.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenRoads DesignerRhino 3D
Features
OpenRoads DesignerRhino 3D
Computer-Aided Design Software
Comparison of Computer-Aided Design Software features of Product A and Product B
OpenRoads Designer
-
Ratings
Rhino 3D
4.5
Ratings
45% below category average
3D Modeling00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
2D Drafting00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Rendering and Visualization00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Parametric Design00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Collaboration and Sharing00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Compatibility with other software and formats00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Assembly Design00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Simulation and Analysis00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Documentation and Annotation00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Customization and Extensions00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenRoads DesignerRhino 3D
Small Businesses
Revit
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Revit
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Revit
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
CATIA
CATIA
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenRoads DesignerRhino 3D
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenRoads DesignerRhino 3D
Likelihood to Recommend
For any linear model creation that follows an alignment. Not suitable to vertical modelling like Buildings.
Read full review
Rhinoceros 3D is very well-suited for buildings with repetitive bay layouts as a design can be quickly be updated (span, number of bay, height etc) simply by updating a couple numerical sliders. It is also well suited to quickly update one model (for example Revit) based on the changes in another model (either another Revit model or an analysis model). Rhinoceros 3D is not well-suited for teams that are not interested in learning GrassHopper as most of Rhino's value is in GrassHopper.
Read full review
Pros
  • Integration with other disciplines. If one uses Bentley's companion products like OpenBridge Modeler or OpenSite Designer, there is no need to export any design information to other disciplines as the .dgn files can be directly referenced into other applications.
  • Visualisation - ORD comes bundled with a free version of LumenRT which produces amazing engineering and architectural renderings and can even be used in VR applications.
  • Design Environment. Being based on the DGN file format is brilliant - being able to have multiple models within a single file has so many advantages over the DWG file format.
Read full review
  • Rhino3D is a great translator. I use it to take in customer models and then add optical components to it in a detailed and precise way.
  • Rhino3D has excellent workflow from curves to surfaces making the translation from optical to mechanical seamless.
  • Rhino3D can be paired with Grasshopper to create interesting and unusual geometry for aesthetic or functional purposes.
Read full review
Cons
  • Creating data. Currently will need to create data tag (e.g. volume, length, material type, material engineering criteria etc.) of component manually. Some of the commonly use data in AECOsim should be preset in OpenRoads.
  • Ability to link geometric data values to geometric properties. Currently not linked (e.g. volume value, length value etc.) and had to be keyed in and/or changed manually.
  • Opening (eg. for MEP interface) creation and modification still manual. There should be a smart opening creation that would create openings at interface location and auto enclose the mesh opening so that the volume will take into account the opening(s) created.
Read full review
  • Rhino has very limited sheet layout tools.
  • Grasshopper could be better integrated into the main interface.
  • Lack of backwards file compatibility can be frustrating.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We would not use ORD if is was not for clients' contract requirement to use ORD.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
A majority of the support for Rhinoceros 3D does not come from the company itself, but from online forums and boards where other Rhinoceros 3D users outline their issues and solutions. The Rhinoceros 3D website does not offer much in-depth support and just outlines general how to's. At the same time, online forums allow for more specific issues to be addressed and solved by the Rhinoceros 3D community.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ORD is a lot faster and a lot more modern than Civil 3D even though they're essentially the same product under different names (in terms of workflows). I find that the DGN file format used by ORD is far better than the DWG file format used by C3D because DGNs can contain much more information and multiple models per file. C3D is very heavy on memorizing keyboard inputs while ORD is a much more modern interface that relies mostly on using the mouse for inputs.
Read full review
Rhino is a generic platform. For BIM, you can combine it with Revit or ARCHICAD or look for extensions, such as VisualArq or the GeometyGym extensions for Grasshopper. Due to its good interoperability, I often use it for reviewing AutoCAD drawings or converting 3D models. That said, the most efficient and fast mesh modeling for non-organic geometry is still SketchUp, due to its many smart approaches to automatic mesh cleanup.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive definitely as all projects I work on require OpenRoads Designer
  • Helps us meet the deliverable requirements set by our clients
Read full review
  • Personally a lot of really cool designs have made it into the real world thanks to my good friend Rhino. Being in the architecture, the ROI is elevated design through giving talented designers the right tool to pull it off.
Read full review
ScreenShots