NetScaler vs. Radware Alteon

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
NetScaler
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
NetScaler ADC is an application delivery controller.N/A
Radware Alteon
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Radware Alteon, from Israeli company Radware, is an application delivery controller.N/A
Pricing
NetScalerRadware Alteon
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NetScalerRadware Alteon
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NetScalerRadware Alteon
Best Alternatives
NetScalerRadware Alteon
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
NetScalerRadware Alteon
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
NetScalerRadware Alteon
Likelihood to Recommend
Citrix NetScaler is suited to any environment where hardware load-balancing, application delivery or SSL offloading is a requirement. It's a product that can be used to manipulate traffic flows in a multitude of different ways and its only limit is the protocol, application and imagination of the administrator. It's not a product that includes helpful wizards to guide the admin through each process gracefully. While it is a fairly intuitive product to use, it's not for someone who is not initiated into the ways of networking and network protocols and communication. Nor is this a product that would lend itself solely for the usage of single usage scenarios where small traffic flows would be expected (although if desired the VPX product would probably suffice in that specific scenario depending on the environment)
Read full review
These devices caused more problems for our company than benefits, I would never recommend these to colleagues.
Read full review
Pros
  • The GUI interface is fairly easy to learn making ramp-up time faster than some similar products.
  • It is used by thousands of companies around the globe so finding free support on Google is usually quite easy.
  • The virtual implementation version of the product runs on a Linux-based hypervisor install so no additional licensing is needed for the OS.
  • When used in conjunction with a Citrix Web front/Storefront, the integration is very tight making the passing of packets very quick.
  • Even in the lesser VPX versions, there is the ability to have a cluster of Netscalers to allow for uptime capability.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • At times it seems like there is a flurry of firmware updates needed to remediate security vulnerabilities which creates some overhead.
  • Out of the box automation using ADM is a bit lacking
  • Nit picking but occasionally there are minor config changes that need to be done via CLI or GUI but nothing significant.
Read full review
  • The software web application is beyond terrible, in most of the cases the web was broken or did not have similar functionality the command line interface had.
  • The command line interface wasn't a natural looking interface, it was very fumbled and while it ran on Linux, the interface was all menus and sub-menus.
  • When enabling different pools for different web services, when a new pool was activated, the old pool connections were all reset instead of allowing HTTP sessions to naturally expire.
Read full review
Usability
I gave the NetScaler a 7 here because the system once configured and deployed is very easy to use. However, if you did not deploy the system and do not have the fundamental background knowledge then you will have trouble using the product in general. Overall it is a great product and service but does typically require professional services to be deployed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Overall, our organization's experience with Citrix support is that support can be hit or miss. Oftentimes it takes multiple attempts and much longer than desirable to obtain a viable solution for issues experienced with their products. It would be great to see Citrix invest time, effort, and almighty dollars into improving their support and bug fix process across the board.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Netscaler has more features than F5 BIG-IP APM product and easier to manage with friendlier user interface for network admins. It was more cost efficient as well and if you have a Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop environment, it is more compatible with those products as well. Our annual maintenance cost is lower as well.
Read full review
We moved away from Alteon to F5 BigIP LTM and just by swapping out the hardware, we saw 40% speed increase in our applications. Everything else is much improved as well, from the web interface to the command line to the API.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Features - There are many features to be used that we haven't quite gotten to.
  • Licensing - The need for licensing is one of those necessary evils.
  • Reporting - It gave our management team the requested graphs and statistics on usage.
Read full review
  • While running on these devices, every release caused many interruptions in service and caused thousands of dollars of lost revenue.
Read full review
ScreenShots