| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NetScaler | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | NetScaler ADC is an application delivery controller. | N/A |
| NetScaler | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| NetScaler | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose NetScaler I have experience with Fortinet Gateways and with Watch Guard gateways. I am aware these products are focused on different purposes but overall they are similar as they are Routers/VPN Endpoints. As far as Netscaler goes, it can compare well to these types of devices and excel … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose NetScaler Citrix was purchased before my employment. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose NetScaler Citrix competes with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services. Citrix however adds features that makes for a lighter client. Lighter bandwidth needed between client and server. This enables you to work over slower data links or enables more users on a link. Citrix gives a better … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose NetScaler Other products such as the Barracuda Load Balancer and NGINX Plus were considered, but not tested. Since our group uses other Citrix solutions, we wanted to go with a unified and integrated approach. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose NetScaler Citrix NetScaler is much more cost-effective than the A10 series and I think it does its job even better. I have used A10 in the past and while they did fine, the did not overly impress me and certainly didn't do enough for the dollar amount that they are attached to. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose NetScaler The Citrix NetScaler is the competitor to the f5 BigIP LTM/GTM. I've used both products extensively and the both have pros and cons against each other. F5 has better support and better documentation, and is purpose built for load balancing applications. The NetScaler has a more … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose NetScaler For hardware products I've used smaller installations of F5 and CoyotePoint appliances. For software load-balancing solutions I've used Piranha (for LVS). The NetScaler and the F5 probably have the highest learning curves and the newer F5's probably have the greater support for … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose NetScaler I use F5 as well, which portions we could do in NetScaler, but we kept our environments separate for specific uses. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose NetScaler Citrix NetScaler seems to be a beast right away. Once you start testing and getting used to the logic that is in place, it becomes the obvious choice for selecting such appliance to be used in an enterprise setting. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
93% Would buy again 13 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
93% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
100% Happy with the feature set 14 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
100% Implementation went as expected 13 Answers | |
| NetScaler | |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies |  Azure Application Gateway Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Azure Application Gateway Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives |
| NetScaler | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.7 |
| Usability | 8.2 |
| Support Rating | 7.3 |
| NetScaler | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Usability |
|
| Support Rating |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
| ScreenShots |
