Net-Results is a marketing automation solution that features segment-driven approaches to lead management and marketing automation. Some key features include support for A/B email testing, drag & drop landing pages, CRM integrations, and automated marketing workflows.
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Ortto
Score 9.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Ortto is presented as a product-led growth engine that helps businesses acquire and retain customers. Since 2015, Ortto has supported over 10,000 companies with their software. Ortto allows online businesses to unify their customer data with their CDP, segment key audiences across the customer lifecycle; activate these audiences with personalized, omnichannel experiences, and analyze their business for growth with a suite of BI tools. The vendor states teams at Microsoft, Bltly, Typeform,…
$199
per month month-to-month commitment with 5,000 contacts
Pricing
Net-Results
Ortto
Editions & Modules
One Price Full Platform
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Starter
$199
per month month-to-month commitment with 5,000 contacts
Professional
$599
per month month-to-month commitment with 10,000 contacts
Business
$999
per month annual commitment, paid monthly with 10,000 contacts
Enterprise
$1,999
per month annual commitment, paid monthly with 10,000 contacts
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Net-Results
Ortto
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Tiered pricing by total email sends or total contacts, you decide. All features included. No upsells or limitations based on your price.
10% discount for quarterly billing. 15% discount for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Net-Results
Ortto
Features
Net-Results
Ortto
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Net-Results
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Ortto
9.0
Ratings
17% above category average
WYSIWYG email editor
7.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Dynamic content
7.20 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
7.30 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Landing pages
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
A/B testing
6.30 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Mobile optimization
5.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
8.00 Ratings
9.90 Ratings
List management
7.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
8.60 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Net-Results
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Ortto
9.2
Ratings
16% above category average
Lead nurturing automation
8.50 Ratings
9.90 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality management
5.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
8.60 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Net-Results
7.5
Ratings
1% above category average
Ortto
8.9
Ratings
18% above category average
Calendaring
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
7.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Net-Results
6.9
Ratings
9% below category average
Ortto
8.9
Ratings
17% above category average
Social sharing and campaigns
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social profile integration
6.70 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Net-Results
6.3
Ratings
15% below category average
Ortto
8.9
Ratings
20% above category average
Dashboards
7.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Standard reports
6.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Custom reports
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
It's great for a small to medium-sized marketing team. We manage it with just a two person marketing staff. It also works well with the Professional version of Salesforce. It works well for moderately skilled marketers, meaning ones that might not have previous marketing automation experience or lots of digital experience. The other options are much more complex. Hope that helps!
It's a great tool for email marketing and making automation flows with those emails. Also push your communication to multiple platforms (social media, SMS, WhatsApp, etc). It's easy to learn so for us easy to teach companies the basics of marketing automation. The clean interface and not to many functions don't make the tool too overwhelming. So for us, one of the better "get your feet wet" tools.
Visibility - Net-Results provides an excellent view into the current state of our prospects. We can understand how prospects are engaging with our assets, create detailed segments, and track prospects through the different stages of our nurturing campaigns.
Responsive email design - Net-Results has an excellent drag and drop email builder that uses responsive email designs. It is the easiest email builder I've ever used and the emails look great on both desktop and phones.
Support - Obviously support is not a product feature, but it is one of the most important aspects to consider when choosing solutions. Net-Results in the front of the pack when it comes to support. Their support team is intelligent, responsive, and is able to provide a resolution often in only one or two emails.
Campaign flexibility - There is a great deal of flexibility when it comes to structuring campaigns. Between segmentation and logical branching Net-Results is able to execute campaigns just as you envision them. They've done a nice job making the campaign complexity scalable, allowing simple campaigns to be created with ease.
Very easy to use automation builder with many great options and integrations. Lets us tailor incredibly precise campaigns through use of Autopilot's own features, plus its tight integrations with data from sources like Segment.
Easy and powerful email editing and creation built-in. No need for email template coding.
Autopilot allows marketers to have full control and implement new web forms to capture leads quickly with its automatic form detection. No need to save custom form data to our own backend saves our development team time.
Adding new contacts to our contact list. I would love integrations with Outlook. I am communicating with new people every day and it would be awesome to be able to tag a new contact and automatically add that person to an appropriate contact segment without logging in and manually adding a new contact (which I rarely do)
Limited Design Customization: If you're an experienced marketer and are used to the unlimited customization capabilities of larger platforms (or coding your own templates), you might find Autopilot's options to be limiting. It's great for a beginner user who shouldn't be encumbered with those options, but I could see if being frustrating for others.
Net Results is pretty easy to use and understand. I wouldn't say that it is the best in comparison to MailChimp's drag and drop email builder, but Net Results do so much more than MailChimp that it is hard to even compare the two. Overall Net Results has good usability
Net-Results is 10X more powerful than HubSpot, which to us was a basic marketing automation implementation that focused only on top of funnel acquisition. Net-Results is structured for the marketing automation power user whereas Pardot is structured for the generic marketing professional. Net-Results lacks in the enterprise level functionalities that Pardot has. But Net-Results excels in the flexibility and customizability of campaigns where Pardot is more limited in terms of how you can send and what you can send based on variables
Autopilot is designed to make the business money more than it costs and we actually get an impressive range of marketing automation features in return for our money. It is a serious platform that is capable of building heavyweight automations. There is a complete set of features that teams use to create email campaigns and automatically send emails.
Not sure. I cannot put a $ on it for ROI as I was the administrator and not part of the team that procured it. Time-wise I would say I spent less time using it than I previously had used in CloudPortal Services Manager.