Modern Campus CMS (formerly Omni Campus) is a CMS for institutions of higher education. It can be deployed as a cloud-based service or hosted locally. It is built in Java, uses open standards, and is extensible through APIs.
N/A
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText
Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign
lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel
publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with
TeamSite, users can:
Capture diverse digital
audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand
experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…
N/A
Pricing
Modern Campus CMS
OpenText Web CMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Modern Campus CMS
OpenText Web CMS
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Modern Campus CMS
OpenText Web CMS
Features
Modern Campus CMS
OpenText Web CMS
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Modern Campus CMS
10.0
Ratings
21% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
Ratings
6% above category average
Role-based user permissions
10.00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Modern Campus CMS
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
API
8.60 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
10.00 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Modern Campus CMS
8.9
Ratings
14% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
9.20 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
9.20 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Admin section
9.20 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Page templates
9.60 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Library of website themes
10.00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
8.80 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Publishing workflow
9.20 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Form generator
6.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
This website works well in an academic setting. It's easy to add pages as your site expands/grows. It's really easy to use and modify pages once you know what you're doing, but it can be a little tricky to get the hang of it at first. It is definitely useful to have in-person or virtual training before you dive in.
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
Assets are easily managed and can be edited independently of the page they exist on.
Version history is handled well. Allows for a comment section to note what changes have been made.
Dependency tags are perfect for media that is used in several places. Upload a photo once, use it in multiple places, edit the photo or its description in one place.
OU Campus could use some improving on their upload changes as far as naming the document because when you are trying to upload the same document with minor revisions, OU Campus requires you to change the name of the document within OU Campus which creates multiple documents in the workfolder.
When naming documents to upload into OU Campus, it would be nice if we could name out documents the way we would instead of having to put an underscore to indicate a space in the document. Most users of OU Campus has not had proper training to know that you need to do that.
I don't work at the college any longer, but I believe they will renew the license for the OU Campus Content Management System because of all the great benefits they have had since they initially deployed it. The system is very intuitive and easy to use. Department leads love it. The IT department also loves it because it saves them a lot of time and resources.
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
Increased satisfaction with user experience. OU Campus has made it easier for us to address problems when they arise, making our website more efficient.
Role-based control. Our old CMS made it very easy for users to change fonts and colors on their sections, which was very detrimental to the overall brand. That's not a problem anymore.
Reduced training times. OU Campus is so easy to use, I've been able to cut training times down by half.
We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.