TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Viva Engage vs. Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Viva Engage

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Viva Engage, formerly Yammer, is used for private communication within organizations or between organizational members and pre-designated groups.

    $24

    per year per user

    Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server provides hosted collaboration and voice / web conferencing tools at the enterprise level.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
    Editions & Modules
    Microsoft Viva Employee Communications and Communities
    $24
    per year per user
    Microsoft Viva Suite
    $144
    per year per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsMicrosoft Viva Engage is also available in some Microsoft 365 packages.
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Microsoft Viva Engage and Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
    Feature
    Microsoft Viva Engage
    5.4
    41 Ratings
    35% below category average
    Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
    7.1
    2 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Task Management6.025 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Gantt Charts7.013 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Scheduling3.019 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Workflow Automation2.021 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Mobile Access8.039 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Search8.039 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Visual planning tools4.023 Ratings6.02 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of Microsoft Viva Engage and Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
    Feature
    Microsoft Viva Engage
    7.6
    44 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
    5.5
    2 Ratings
    36% below category average
    Chat8.040 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Notifications7.044 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Discussions8.043 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Surveys6.034 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase9.033 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Integrates with GoToMeeting7.314 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts6.713 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    Integrates with Outlook8.632 Ratings1.02 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Microsoft Viva Engage and Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
    Feature
    Microsoft Viva Engage
    5.0
    37 Ratings
    44% below category average
    Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
    5.1
    2 Ratings
    42% below category average
    Versioning7.025 Ratings4.01 Ratings
    Video files5.032 Ratings6.02 Ratings
    Audio files4.030 Ratings4.02 Ratings
    Document collaboration1.031 Ratings5.02 Ratings
    Access control3.031 Ratings5.02 Ratings
    Advanced security features5.028 Ratings5.02 Ratings
    Integrates with Google Drive8.014 Ratings4.02 Ratings
    Device sync7.024 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
    Small Businesses
    Flock
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Flock
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Microsoft Viva Engage
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Keep
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Google Keep
    Score9.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (54 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.9
    (10 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft Viva EngageOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Yammer is great when you have a company culture that encourages friendly collaboration and communication. It can be a great supplement (but certainly not a substitute) for bonding and sharing ideas and thoughts. Certain channels can be really successful, too, like a channel where people can post dog pictures or something fun like that!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    The software is well suited in most areas of messaging. The communication features it contains and the messaging quality it utilizes provides for standards, like scalability, manageability and, most importantly, secure communications. Again, the software is well suited for scenarios where an organization is aimed at making use of a centralized management. it is built to provide a unified collaborative platform characterized by a single object model and also has a database storage for almost all communication records.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Providing a platform for social news in the company where "bottom up" topics can percolate freely across department
    • Social networking across the company where folks can divide their work into topics instead of teams
    • Basic collaboration within a group including document sharing with ability to pin documents to a team
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Video conferencing - The features it provides is apart from any standalone.
    • Mail messenger `
    • Instant messaging
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Although the social enterprise network works very well, there is room for some slight improvement - such as the ability to attract users. By being part of the Microsoft Office Suite, it is offered as an "add-on" and many overlook it and see it as unnecessary at first. It would be smart for Microsoft to sell it as its own product so it could gather more popularity as a "social network".
    • Giving an option to filter results could be better as well as giving an option to turn off the "recent activity" bar on the home page.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • The only area that the software has room for improvement is in the mail part. To a large extent, the email capabilities to the Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaborative Server is not user-friendly. My opinion is that if the mail option was made in a more separate appearance to that of the calendar, task management, and address books it would appear more user-friendly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    Microsoft is dedicated to continual improvement on Yammer. They realize the value that Yammer brings to the table with their clients. In the short time that we have had Yammer implemented, we are just now beginning to see the strong impact it has on becoming more effective and efficient around collaboration.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Microsoft
    Overall easy to use and intuitive, although limited in the possibility to personalize layout and look & feel of a site. Some functionalities are not easy to use, like document editing, but some others are quick and effective (posts and tagging above all). Performance and responsiveness of the Yammer site is typically acceptable, in my experience.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    Very available
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Microsoft
    It's a simple product but it does provide value.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    We have never had to use the support for Yammer. The tool works well and we have not come across any bugs. User Interface is simple and easy to use, similar to other forum type products, thereby removing the need for any extensive training. Team members are invited in and immediately are able to start using the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Microsoft
    The training that Microsoft provides is very generic training for Yammer. I like the fact the training is short and easy to understand
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    We organically implemented the product
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Our team briefly used Salesforce.com's Chatter product before switching over to Yammer in 2012. While Chatter is essentially the same product as Yammer, it left much to be desired. Chatter's design was (and remains) clunky and difficult to navigate. Yammer is a simple, easy-to-use product that offers similar functionality as Salesforce's Chatter.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    The only feature that makes Beehive Enterprise Collaborative software stack up against similar software is unification. It is wholly unified. Basically, it allows IT to function as one platform providing services like email, team workspace, and conferencing. Uniquely, this results in saving time and cost related to managing separate systems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • My company is pleased with the positive impact Yammer has created departmentally and on an individual basis with work flow efficiency.
    • Adversely, most old and new employees are more familiar with SharePoint, causing the company to pay for training for all current and incoming employees.
    • As Yammer becomes more widely used, the need for training may diminish, which is where we will see our return on investment, as the product clearly provides a more effective form of file sharing and communication between employees and their department.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • If one uses all its features to its optimum, I think they can go for break-even within around 1 year. We were able to achieve it. It helped us grab many projects.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots