Microsoft Teams vs. webinar.net

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Teams
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
webinar.net
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Webinar.net launched in 2019, designed to be a modern alternative to the dated Meeting tools that are often used for marketing and training applications, presented as a powerful, easy-to-use online presentation platform with polished user interfaces. Webinar.net is fully hosted in the cloud. The vendor states this architecture allows users to reach very large audiences without capacity concerns, and enjoy simple, cost-effective pricing. With it, brands are fully represented when…N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Teamswebinar.net
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Teamswebinar.net
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$329 per account
Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Teamswebinar.net
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Teams

No answer on this topic

webinar.net
Chose webinar.net
webinar.net was adopted by our company to replace ON24 since it is much cheaper. We use it in combination with Slido, sometimes. It serves large one-way webinars (up to 1,000 attendees) with limited interaction (polls and Q&A), while for smaller and more interactive online …
Features
Microsoft Teamswebinar.net
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
5.8
192 Ratings
28% below category average
webinar.net
-
Ratings
Task Management6.4147 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts4.876 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling5.5162 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation5.5101 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access6.9184 Ratings00 Ratings
Search5.5169 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools5.9118 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
6.9
201 Ratings
14% below category average
webinar.net
-
Ratings
Chat7.4200 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications6.6199 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions7.1187 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys6.6112 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase6.0122 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.547 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts5.743 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.1156 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
6.4
186 Ratings
20% below category average
webinar.net
-
Ratings
Versioning6.7130 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files5.9158 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files6.6160 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration7.6173 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control6.9156 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features5.6117 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.353 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync6.3132 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
webinar.net
4.5
1 Ratings
50% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Data exportability00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
webinar.net
7.0
1 Ratings
13% below category average
High quality audio00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
webinar.net
8.8
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Calendar integration00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Record meetings / events00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Slideshows00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Event registration00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
webinar.net
8.5
1 Ratings
2% above category average
Audience polling00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Q&A00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
webinar.net
8.0
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Participant roles & permissions00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Confidential attendee list00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Online Events Marketing
Comparison of Online Events Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
webinar.net
7.0
1 Ratings
10% below category average
Branding options00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Teamswebinar.net
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
BigMarker
BigMarker
Score 6.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Zoho Meeting
Zoho Meeting
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
ON24
ON24
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Teamswebinar.net
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(278 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
3.7
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.1
(62 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(113 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
6.3
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
7.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Teamswebinar.net
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Positive: The virtual workspace created for a work team within the same company, for the resemblance of information and communications in one place.Negative: The access for members of a non-profit organization who have external emails from the host but need the same access as an internal person since their volunteer work is part of the very core of the federation.
Read full review
webinar.net
If price is not an object, I would always prefer ON24 rather than webinar.net. However, ON24 is much more expensive. Webinar.net is owned by 6Connex, so the integration of webinar.net in 6Connex is recommended if you need to host a webinar in a 6Connex environment. Support staff is nice, but not knowledgeable enough and takes too long. When a presenter plays a video they get muted automatically, even if the video has no sound! So you then have to either unmute the speaker yourself or having him/her doing it which adds to the stress of the moment. We have had a few cases when email reminders didn't go out, even if programmed and saved correctly.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Virtual meetings - ease of set up and execution
  • File sharing! We build channels for projects, and being able to invite only project members is huge!
  • Peer-to-peer communications - being able to "ping" one of my colleagues, either text, video or call-only, on-demand, is what runs our business.
Read full review
webinar.net
  • calendar tool on the registration page
  • being able to embed videos on the registration page
  • note tool for presenters
  • large number of attendees allowed
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • The feature of notifications in the mobile application could be improved. Sometimes notifications of different teams are not visible and are only visible when the application is opened.
  • It uses lots of computational resources while running and thus, slows down the system sometimes.
  • It allows a few channels per team. The number of channels could be increased for better productivity.
Read full review
webinar.net
  • connectivity for presenters is not easy and not user friendly enough
  • you can't just choose CET time, you need to display a city in CET time
  • no blurred background
  • no virtual background
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Read full review
webinar.net
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
User experience has been much better than the previous Skype for Business app. It has an easy-to-use interface with persistent chats. The search feature is very fast and useful. MS Teams has mostly focused on Collaboration and team building features which are very useful for organizational communications. Since Teams is accessible from multiple platforms like Laptop, Desktop, Mobile phones, etc it has been very convenient from a Mobility perspective.
Read full review
webinar.net
The audience screen doesn't adjust automatically, not even on mobile phones; connection for presenters is difficult, taking time to support them and many times leaving them a bit frustrated. For us, it is not ideal the time it takes to publish content and also the time and quality of the support team replies. However, it has great potential for improvement.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
Rare, but outages do happen
Read full review
webinar.net
No answers on this topic
Performance
Microsoft
Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
Read full review
webinar.net
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Using Microsoft Teams has resulted in much faster business communications with both co-workers and consultants. There has been little need for support with this software as the interface is very intuitive and the product is overall very well designed. We did encounter an issue with the built-in phone service, however, this was quickly resolved by the support team.
Read full review
webinar.net
They are very kind and readily available online and off-line; however they hardly know the answers and always need to check, making it very lengthy process and sometimes it feels like a bit of a waste of time too. I would suggest they are given more training to start with
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
Read full review
webinar.net
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Our company and IT department previously used Skype for our communication needs. Skype was not dependable in my opinion, because it seems each time I used it during a call and/or a meeting, I and several other team members would get disconnected more than once. This caused a great interruption of our meeting, caused team members to have to ask others to repeat themselves and caused a general lack of interest in employee attendance during meetings.
Read full review
webinar.net
webinar.net was adopted by our company to replace ON24 since it is much cheaper. We use it in combination with Slido, sometimes. It serves large one-way webinars (up to 1,000 attendees) with limited interaction (polls and Q&A), while for smaller and more interactive online events we keep using Microsoft Teams Meetings or Webinars and Zoom Meetings.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Microsoft
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
Read full review
webinar.net
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Microsoft
It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
Read full review
webinar.net
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
Microsoft
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Read full review
webinar.net
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • I'm not sure I can point to a specific ROI, but it has improved our ability to communicate and work more effectively together.
  • It's also nice to have records of every interaction, photo, and document that has been shared. Less chance of something completely disappearing.
Read full review
webinar.net
  • higher number of attendees
  • repeating clients
  • more likelihood to create a series of events vs a standalone event
Read full review
ScreenShots