Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics SL
QAD Adaptive ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
QAD Adaptive ERP
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics SL
QAD Adaptive ERP
Features
Microsoft Dynamics SL
QAD Adaptive ERP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
Ratings
17% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
33% above category average
Pay calculation
9.60 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
API for custom integration
6.00 Ratings
9.90 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.3
Ratings
11% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Single sign-on capability
7.40 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.30 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.8
Ratings
6% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
32% above category average
Dashboards
7.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
26% above category average
Accounts payable
7.60 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.3
Ratings
59% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.3
Ratings
16% above category average
Inventory tracking
6.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Location management
1.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Pricing
6.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Order entry
6.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.8
Ratings
25% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Billing Management
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
6.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
Ratings
47% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
2.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
Ratings
16% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
21% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.2
Ratings
22% above category average
Production Management
6.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
In the service series, there is a weakness in applying revenue recognition concepts which are a strong point of the project series. It is difficult to get a period sensitive WIP that could be recreated at any time for a point in time (fiscal period).
Suited very well for small to medium sized organizations as it provides you everything you can expect from an ERP (without any fancy bells and whistles that SAP and some of the other ERPs provide). Works well with a lean IT organization, as the configuration and ongoing maintenance and/or analysis is pretty straightforward.
Ability to add companies, and sub-accounts on the fly allows for the growth of the system without conversions, and flexible reporting allows for the quick utilization of the data.
Multi-Company allows for easy and automated data entry and reporting across multiple legal entities and business segments.
Multi-Company also allows for easy centralization of business processes (AP check writing and Fixed Assets for example), while spreading data entry across the enterprise.
Ability to Copy/Paste into Dynamics SL has always been a strength- especially from Excel. The additional power of being able to use Excel for a myriad of calculations, including complex allocations, and formatting the result into a JE to paste directly into the Journal Entry Screen has saved countless hours in data-entry, and made re-use of complex items very easy.
The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
When we have a lot of invoices rather than just a few large invoices, we can be frustrated by how long it takes Flexible Billings to generate a lot of invoices
It would be nice if Dynamics SL had an easy integration to some of the nicer salestax tools such as Avalara and CCH.
It would be nice if the fixed assets module and electronic banking were not third party.
As a user and who managed the application, I have longed for a module that you don't have to go thru the entire frame to go to a certain field. They have addressed this issue on their recent release by going to a web frame.
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
SL itself is relatively easy to use and most of the Help Files documentation is well kept and outstanding in the amount of information that is given. Most end users pick up the functions quickly and are off and running after some limited training. There will always be questions and research to be done, but overall SL is relatively easy to follow for a seasoned user
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
Many times support will tell you that your issue is an identified bug and will be scheduled in the future to be fixed in a future release. The knowledgebase has gotten worse in recent years and much more difficult to use. many times you can't find the error during the search
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
We started with QuickBooks Enterprise when our company was young. We quickly outgrew this program as it was not able to accommodate the financial reporting we needed to satisfy our investors. QuickBooks was also very limited in managing our revenue as we grew. We did try Great Plains and Peachtree (now Sage 50) and we discovered that they were rather complicated for our users. They were not as easy to maneuver and manipulate as SL and we felt that SL was much more "user friendly" and simplified, but still able to produce the same results.
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.