TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Dynamics SL

    Score5.3 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. This product was acquired from Solomon 2000. The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.N/A

    QAD Adaptive ERP

    Score6.9 out of 10
    N/AQAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERP
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERP
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERP
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and QAD Adaptive ERP
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    8.5
    2 Ratings
    17% above category average
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    33% above category average
    Pay calculation9.62 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Direct deposit files9.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and QAD Adaptive ERP
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.0
    6 Ratings
    23% below category average
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    27% above category average
    API for custom integration6.06 Ratings9.92 Ratings
    Plug-ins6.04 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and QAD Adaptive ERP
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    7.3
    9 Ratings
    11% below category average
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    10.0
    4 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Single sign-on capability7.49 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions7.38 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and QAD Adaptive ERP
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.8
    9 Ratings
    6% below category average
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    10.0
    3 Ratings
    32% above category average
    Dashboards7.15 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Standard reports7.19 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Custom reports6.19 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
    Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and QAD Adaptive ERP
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    7.4
    10 Ratings
    4% below category average
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    26% above category average
    Accounts payable7.610 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Accounts receivable6.07 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Global Financial Support6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.63 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journals and Reconciliations7.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configurable Accounting7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standardized Processes7.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Management
    Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and QAD Adaptive ERP
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    4.3
    5 Ratings
    59% below category average
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    9.3
    4 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Inventory tracking6.05 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Location management1.02 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Automatic reordering00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Order Management
    Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and QAD Adaptive ERP
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.7
    3 Ratings
    16% below category average
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    9.0
    4 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Pricing6.02 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Order entry6.03 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Credit card processing7.02 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Cost of goods sold7.02 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Order Orchestration00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Subledger and Financial Process
    Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and QAD Adaptive ERP
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    5.8
    3 Ratings
    25% below category average
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    -
    Ratings
    Billing Management6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cash and Asset Management7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Travel & Expense Management5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Period Close7.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Financial Management
    Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and QAD Adaptive ERP
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    4.7
    3 Ratings
    47% below category average
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    -
    Ratings
    Budgeting and Forecasting7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Costing6.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost Capture2.12 Ratings00 Ratings
    Capital Project Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Grants Management
    Comparison of Grants Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and QAD Adaptive ERP
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.3
    1 Ratings
    16% below category average
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    -
    Ratings
    Award Lifecycle Management6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing
    Comparison of Manufacturing features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and QAD Adaptive ERP
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    21% below category average
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    9.2
    1 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Production Management6.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Production Process Design00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Configuration Management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Work Execution00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Supply Chain
    Comparison of Supply Chain features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and QAD Adaptive ERP
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    17% below category average
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    8.3
    1 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Inventory Planning6.01 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Forecasting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Performance Monitoring00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERP
    Small Businesses
    Zoho One
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Zoho One
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERP
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.6
    (17 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    5.4
    (8 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    1.8
    (6 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.5
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    1.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERP
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAD
    If you're setting up operations where you have to manage manufacturing builds from raw components to finished goods, I would recommend QAD. It's nice to have subassemblies part numbers for your builds and enter in the number of accepted quantities and rejects. QAD is very helpful if you have a lot of parts floating around. I would not buy QAD if you only have to manage less than ~20 parts... just use Excel.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
    • Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
    • A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
    • Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
    • Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
    • Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAD
    • The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
    • The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
    • The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
    • I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
    • Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAD
    • Needs more flexibility to add/configure new indexes (if using the Progress Database) as the current indexes on key tables like transaction history are not helpful
    • Need a better support system for the TMS/Precision interface
    • Need better KnowledgeBase articles to understand the innerds of Pricing functionality
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAD
    The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAD
    Easy to use, zero or minimum cost to maintain the database (DBA etc) , no issue with OS ( Linux), stable database
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAD
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAD
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAD
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAD
    QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Microsoft
    Since the backbone of the database is MS SQLServer, the database can be easily scaled.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAD
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • More time is spent on manipulating reports which can and should be automated.
    • Lack of electronic invoicing process and other green technology features creates more cost on printing and storage costs.
    • The lack of a user friendly interface requires more training and a bigger learning curve for staff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAD
    • It help us to reduce the inventories (FG and RAW)
    • It reduce the time to adjust to the constantly changing international customs laws
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots