Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.
N/A
ScaleFactor
Score 9.5 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Austin-based ScaleFactor provides their small business accounting automation platform designed to combine software and expert assistance to SMBs and remove concern for financial, tax and accounting challenges.
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GP
ScaleFactor
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
ScaleFactor
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GP
ScaleFactor
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GP
ScaleFactor
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
Ratings
16% below category average
ScaleFactor
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
Ratings
9% below category average
ScaleFactor
9.0
Ratings
16% above category average
API for custom integration
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.5
Ratings
25% below category average
ScaleFactor
9.5
Ratings
13% above category average
Single sign-on capability
6.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
ScaleFactor
9.6
Ratings
20% above category average
Dashboards
7.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Standard reports
7.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Custom reports
6.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
15% below category average
ScaleFactor
9.5
Ratings
20% above category average
Accounts payable
6.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Cash management
6.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
6.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Expense management
7.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Time tracking
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
6.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
7.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Self-service portal
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
7.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
Ratings
8% below category average
ScaleFactor
9.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Inventory tracking
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing module
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
It does accounting really well, it does payroll not so well. I say this because when you get into states that have complicated payroll laws like California, overtime calculations are hard to setup and get right. Same goes for other states when they do out of the normal pay structure like piece rate pay. It does HR, A/P and A/R really well and we have had no issues on that side; just payroll when it comes to certain states and how we do anything that is not salary or hourly.
I work with several businesses and have attempted to bring ScaleFactor into multiple. Thus far the business status/environment has been suitable for ScaleFactor only once, but I'll continue to look for more. ScaleFactor is great when a company has matured beyond the owner making all accounting and banking entries. As soon as multiple systems are needed, it's likely a decent time to call ScaleFactor. I'm confident my operations could run through ScaleFactor for a long time as the next step for us would be something akin to NetSuite or some other more rigid enterprise solution. Additionally, our business has a geographically displaced work force, typically working from home. Having access to all systems via the cloud has been great. No longer do we have to pass a specific computer back and forth for a physical computer software license. It's enabled maximum work flow convenience.
Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Having an integration between Project Accounting and Field Service would be amazing! There are so many companies that have service technicians that perform work on a customer's contract but also have a need for project accounting functionality within that customer's contract. Right now those modules are separate so you either need to use one or duplicate some efforts if you need to use both.
Microsoft Dynamics GP could do a better job documenting their new enhancements to the product. They realize great enhancements but the documentation about them, or new products, is lacking so it is difficult as a consultant to know everything a new feature can do for me and my customers.
They could enhance their forecasting capabilities with a new forecasting tool within Management Reporter.
Seems to be a constant turnover in my team at ScaleFactor, which means a lot of explaining what our business does and needs again and again. And that means a lot of emails, disorganization and phone calls (Taking my time).
Chatbot doesn't seem to work well. Never answers the questions I'm in need of for a quick answer!
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Overall usability of the older model is not quite so user friendly for the basic bookeeper, but at an accountants level we can generate all the necessary reports and create Sales Orders, Purchase orders and invoices - though it is a bit redundant to enter the sales and purchase orders separately instead of being able to convert a sales order directly to a puchase order by applying a price book like the newer versions can.
ScaleFactor has been a great resource for me as I got my business off the ground. They have allowed me to focus on marketing and strategy while they handle my Quickbooks and other accounting needs. Great accounting and finance solutions that don't require you to hire an in-house staff.
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Scale factor, can be used like Xero I believe. However all my past data was already stored in Xero so I used it as an add on. It is a lot more user friendly and helpful, i.e. you don't need to be an accountant to use it. However I am not sure it is useable anymore or supported, so i have gone back to using Xero alone.
If implemented properly, the product can save many hours of data entry time - specifically by setting up integrations of large data sets.
Many times the underlying business process must be adjusted to accommodate software limitations. By being flexible, a company can leverage their users' skills in combination with GP to make data entry faster and more efficient. I have seen many companies eliminate the need for data entry personnel as well as reallocate employee hours to more skilled positions such as reporting and analytics.
Poor implementations, on the other hand, can cause employees to hate their jobs and the software. This isn't specific to GP but to the software industry in general.