Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
A now discontinued accounting solution, QuickBooks Self-Employed featured tools to help the self-employed drive growth and financial stability. It is replaced by the more advanced QuickBooks Solopreneur.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
Ratings
16% below category average
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
7.8
Ratings
1% above category average
Pay calculation6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration7.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
Ratings
9% below category average
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
API for custom integration7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Plug-ins7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.5
Ratings
25% below category average
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Single sign-on capability6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
24% above category average
Dashboards7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standard reports7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Custom reports6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
15% below category average
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
25% above category average
Accounts payable6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Cash management6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Expense management7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Time tracking7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Fixed asset management6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multi-currency support8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multi-division support7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Regulations compliance6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Localizations8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
Ratings
8% below category average
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
31% above category average
Inventory tracking7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Location management8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Manufacturing module6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
14% below category average
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
26% above category average
Pricing6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Order entry7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
It does accounting really well, it does payroll not so well. I say this because when you get into states that have complicated payroll laws like California, overtime calculations are hard to setup and get right. Same goes for other states when they do out of the normal pay structure like piece rate pay. It does HR, A/P and A/R really well and we have had no issues on that side; just payroll when it comes to certain states and how we do anything that is not salary or hourly.
Read full review
QuickBooks is a great tool for new SoleTraders that need basic accounting software and require digital invoicing for their clients to send via email and access key features via a mobile app on the go. QuickBooks is a straightforward tool to use with a simple design and learning curve for business owners that are not very tech-savvy. For businesses that operate on a larger scale and need to provide access to other users on their team, QuickBooks is limited. This type of business may also require more insights into the business outside of accounting, and QuickBooks won't be able to supply insights outside of that.
Read full review
Pros
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
  • Tracking expenses is as simple as swiping left and right, it couldn't be easier.
  • Running invoices through QuickBooks is simple and effective.
  • Allowing clients to pay by card or check allows you to get paid faster and give the clients multiple ways of paying invoices, which helps everyone.
  • Automatically tracking estimated quarterly taxes is very helpful and it keeps it top-of mind for each month.
Read full review
Cons
  • Having an integration between Project Accounting and Field Service would be amazing! There are so many companies that have service technicians that perform work on a customer's contract but also have a need for project accounting functionality within that customer's contract. Right now those modules are separate so you either need to use one or duplicate some efforts if you need to use both.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP could do a better job documenting their new enhancements to the product. They realize great enhancements but the documentation about them, or new products, is lacking so it is difficult as a consultant to know everything a new feature can do for me and my customers.
  • They could enhance their forecasting capabilities with a new forecasting tool within Management Reporter.
Read full review
  • There are a number of unnecessary and ongoing prompts to do small tasks, like creating a rule for certain transactions. I could do without those.
  • There are also occasional glitches with bank setup that produce duplicate transactions which can be a pain to deal with. I also haven't been able to find a way to effectively edit transactions.
  • I also wish that QBSE integrated with software like Freshbooks, Tripit and Expensify.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Overall usability of the older model is not quite so user friendly for the basic bookeeper, but at an accountants level we can generate all the necessary reports and create Sales Orders, Purchase orders and invoices - though it is a bit redundant to enter the sales and purchase orders separately instead of being able to convert a sales order directly to a puchase order by applying a price book like the newer versions can.
Read full review
I have been using this software for several years now and it has always put out my data in beautiful generated reports that I can use for verification purposes with my financial institute and the IRS. It has all the tools I need to run my business without loosing track of anything
Read full review
Support Rating
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
I have never faced any difficulties that required me to contact QuickBooks customer service. QuickBooks has plenty of online tutorials, blog posts, and helpful tips and advice for almost any issues you may face using the desktop or app version of the software. Even if you can not find the right answer on the QuickBooks webpages, there are loads of YouTube videos from experts.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Read full review
To be honest, I haven't shopped around for a bookkeeping package. I've been using TurboTax for well over a decade, and adding on QuickBooks Self-Employed (once I made the switch to freelancing) was a no-brainer. I probably could have used the program to help me keep track of employee expenses as I was working for others in the past.
Read full review
Scalability
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • If implemented properly, the product can save many hours of data entry time - specifically by setting up integrations of large data sets.
  • Many times the underlying business process must be adjusted to accommodate software limitations. By being flexible, a company can leverage their users' skills in combination with GP to make data entry faster and more efficient. I have seen many companies eliminate the need for data entry personnel as well as reallocate employee hours to more skilled positions such as reporting and analytics.
  • Poor implementations, on the other hand, can cause employees to hate their jobs and the software. This isn't specific to GP but to the software industry in general.
Read full review
  • A positive impact on my business is, of course, keeping track of income and expenses, and approximate quarterly taxes. QuickBooks is a little better at this than Quicken, I think.
  • By using QuickBooks (and Quicken) it saves me having to spend money on an accountant. (At least up to this point.)
  • However, the time I spend on daily or weekly entries takes billable time away from other things.
Read full review
ScreenShots