Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) vs. QAD Adaptive ERP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (or Dynamics AX) was an ERP product in the Dynamics family. It has been split into separate Dynamics 365 products and is no longer available.N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)QAD Adaptive ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)QAD Adaptive ERP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)QAD Adaptive ERP
Features
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)QAD Adaptive ERP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
Ratings
20% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
33% above category average
Pay calculation9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
API for custom integration5.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Plug-ins8.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
6.0
Ratings
31% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Single sign-on capability5.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.3
Ratings
14% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
32% above category average
Dashboards9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standard reports7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Custom reports9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.2
Ratings
6% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
26% above category average
Accounts payable7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
10% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.3
Ratings
16% above category average
Inventory tracking8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location management9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Pricing8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Order entry9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Credit card processing3.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
15% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Billing Management8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.9
Ratings
16% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
Ratings
24% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
15% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
23% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
Ratings
30% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Risk Repository9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.5
Ratings
24% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.7
Ratings
4% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.2
Ratings
22% above category average
Production Process Design9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Production Management8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Work Execution8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.2
Ratings
26% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.3
Ratings
15% above category average
Forecasting9.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Inventory Planning9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.0
Ratings
23% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Proposal Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)QAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)QAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
It integrates fully with the other Microsoft software we use daily, and this coordination speeds up our work and gives us the agility to run easily. For example, in a purchase inquiry, the customer, after submitting a request, identifies the teams that should work on the project, and if they need further review by other people, they are added to the process, and everything is managed seamlessly rather than the sales process. Get the result as fast as possible.
Read full review
Suited very well for small to medium sized organizations as it provides you everything you can expect from an ERP (without any fancy bells and whistles that SAP and some of the other ERPs provide). Works well with a lean IT organization, as the configuration and ongoing maintenance and/or analysis is pretty straightforward.
Read full review
Pros
  • Pricing: Microsoft Dynamics AX gives us good flexibility in how we price our products.
  • UX: Microsoft Dynamics AX has a good user interface to put valuable information on the screen for users.
  • Inventory Management: Microsoft Dynamics AX does a great job at giving us insight into our inventory.
Read full review
  • The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
  • The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
  • The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
Read full review
Cons
  • Sales Ledger. Currently, the idea behind the sales ledger module is that the company prepares a sales order for another company. I would prefer the developers consider the scenario where a sales order is prepared for the same company but for another branch or unit.
  • Postings of issues items are currently possible but none of the modules caters to "departmental material or item request". Further tweaks have been done on our Project Module to cater for this but it's not entirely perfect. This will enable aid in cost allocation per departmental request of materials or items.
  • Challenges with the bank module - does not allow for easily reconciliation as the statement from the banks can not be uploaded except for specific format.
Read full review
  • As a user and who managed the application, I have longed for a module that you don't have to go thru the entire frame to go to a certain field. They have addressed this issue on their recent release by going to a web frame.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft Dynamics continues to evolve by bringing more functionality to the customer. Also there are several independent software providers that offer a wide range of solutions for vertical markets.
Read full review
The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
Read full review
Usability
Overall the product does what we need it to do in order for us to function as a company. While there are some concerns over ongoing costs, the belief is, once we have it fully acclimated to our business the cost should settle into alignment with our original expectations. The new features that are consistently being added do add value to the product as they are usually customer request directed.
Read full review
Easy to use, zero or minimum cost to maintain the database (DBA etc) , no issue with OS ( Linux), stable database
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
We use a 3rd-party Microsoft Partner for the system. They are responsive and very knowledgeable. While costs have been mentioned several times in this review they are very aware of costs and have developers who are more economical they use to help offset the level of work required to meet our changes and fix our issues.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
It took a lot of work, but Microsoft ultimately did a good job with in-person training, including being onsite in multiple global locations for extended periods.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Our solution deviated from a number of key out-of-the-box standards that were included in Online training. We just used that for introduction to the general functionality.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Some rough spots, but ultimately worked out. The contract didn't appear to be structured to support the level of overlapping facility deployments required to meet timeline commitments. Merging cultures on the program was also challenging. Overall, not an easy implementation by any stretch. Everyone did the best they could.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cost and local regional compliance were primary factors in chosing Microsoft Dynamics AX over SAP Access Control for our need. SAP AC would have provided easier integration into our primary ERP system SAP but there were some regional compliance with ASEAN countries as well as the cost of implementation was more over Microsoft Dynamics AX.
Read full review
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Clients have seen better cost containment on inventory based on better on hand management and supply chain visibility.
  • Faster closing process for the finance team, where by day 3 of 4 you can generate a trial balance and look to balance ledger to sub-ledger.
  • Better reporting allows for real time analysis and can get to predictive metrics in certain areas.
Read full review
  • ROI - very high with QAD.
  • Yearly maintenance cost is very low.
  • Support is very good from the QAD customer service team, knowledge base web site.
  • Very quick to implement the system.
Read full review
ScreenShots