Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management. | $2.50 per user/per month |
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System | Score7.8 out of 10 | N/A | Trellix Intrusion Prevention System (replacing the former McAfee Network Security Platform) is an intrusion detection and prevention system (IDPS) for on-prem or virtual networks. | N/A |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Trellix Intrusion Prevention System | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Trellix Intrusion Prevention System | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 117 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
98% Delivers good value for the price 109 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
94% Happy with the feature set 113 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
98% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 96 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
95% Implementation went as expected 103 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Trellix Intrusion Prevention System | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Trellix Intrusion Prevention System | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Score9.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Watchguard Endpoint Security Score8.8 out of 10 | Snort Score8.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score9.1 out of 10 | Proofpoint Advanced Threat Protection Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Trellix Intrusion Prevention System | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.4 | 7.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.4 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.0 | - |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Trellix Intrusion Prevention System | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots |






