Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trellix Enterprise Security Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management.
$2.50
per user/per month
Trellix Enterprise Security Manager
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Trellix Enterprise Security Manager (formerly McAfee Enterprise Security Manager) is security information and event management (SIEM) software.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Editions & Modules
Academic
$2.50
per user/per month
Standalone
$5.20
per user/per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

No answer on this topic

Trellix Enterprise Security Manager
Chose Trellix Enterprise Security Manager
Other evaluated products: Microsoft Defender and Symantec
- McAffee has more comprehensive integrated tools that better serve our infrastructure
- Analysts found the use of the tool more intuitive
Features
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
8.4
56 Ratings
2% below category average
Trellix Enterprise Security Manager
-
Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology7.953 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.155 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Management8.955 Ratings00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support7.210 Ratings00 Ratings
Infection Remediation9.154 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management7.852 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware Detection8.855 Ratings00 Ratings
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
-
Ratings
Trellix Enterprise Security Manager
8.4
9 Ratings
8% above category average
Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings8.69 Ratings
Correlation00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Deployment flexibility00 Ratings8.39 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings9.37 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings9.39 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings8.37 Ratings
Data integration/API management00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings8.62 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings8.62 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings8.62 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings7.62 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.4 out of 10
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 4.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(99 ratings)
9.0
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.4
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(5 ratings)
6.5
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Because of its integration with Windows, it is very easy to deploy and manage. Any IT department should be able to leverage the software and interface. The admin portal provides weighted recommendations that comprise the Secure Store, offering admins, security teams, and business owners valuable insights into their security footprint without requiring a strong security background. The software would be ideal for small and mid-sized businesses that cannot dedicate resources to security. Larger enterprises would also benefit, but may require the enhanced license.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
I believe that McAfee Enterprise Security Manager is best-suited for anyone in an office setting with a computer containing sensitive information. McAfee Enterprise Security Manager is constantly working to make sure that your device is free from an threats. Our field workers, however, probably wouldn't have a need for McAfee Enterprise Security Manager. They do not use computers for work and have no sensitive information stored in a work-related cloud.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • One, it's crazy lightweight, so compared to some of the competitors that we also have used with our security services, it's really lightweight and so I don't have a lot of overhead on the system that it's running on.
  • It does really fantastic PowerShell integration.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • McAfee Enterprise Security Manager has a large library of pre-made correlations that reduces the amount of work needed to make it functional.
  • This is a core McAfee product that is still getting support.
  • It has a substantial amount of compatibility and integration with other products.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • So the fact that Defender for Endpoint still works with signatures is actually, I don't know, a little difficult for us because, I mean, since Microsoft trusts those signatures, you can easily inject code. And we've done it many times. To show that you can inject code through vulnerabilities like CV 2013, 99, and 33 but still keep the signature. So because of the trust of those signatures, the malware just kind of slides into the environment without Defender knowing. That's the first part. The second part is that the behavioral analysis is not precisely its Prime. It's not Defender's best capability for endpoints. So, Defender does not identify all behaviors considered by other EDRs in the market.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • The user interface is not the best, it is still based on Flash player (but they have plans to migrate to HTML5).
  • While the "user" interface is pretty straight forward, the management interface is fairly complicated.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Cost add-ons for Security features is nickel and diming the process to keep pace with cybercrime. Limited Education budgets require us to be more pro-active in finding cost-effective measures to protect our devices, staff and students. Defender is a strong, well-featured product that is pricing itself out of the education market
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
It offers multiple security features and integrates well with Microsoft ecosystems. A workflow for threat detection, investigation, automated remediation, and a centralized dashboard is an added advantage. This application is mainly designed for experienced users; new users may feel challenged.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint chugs along just fine no matter what we throw at it and what systems it's running on. It doesn't take up a lot of resources either, so that's welcomed.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Performance
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easy on memory and resources on clients.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
The first time I tried to onboard my macOS endpoints to MDE I struggled for quite a bit. I had to reach out to Microsoft's MDE support team. The tech was very helpful in walking me through the steps during a screen share session
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
McAfee Enterprise Security Manager overall is a great tool. It is effective in today's setting, wherein lots of potential threats are lurking. Its operations within the network are seamless. Users won't even notice that a SIEM is working in the background. But in today's trend, most of the businesses is heading towards the migration to cloud, which McAfee should improve its integration with.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Deployment was handled by our team here and everything went pretty smoothly. We did have a few hiccups in our test group, but that only took a bit to get ironed out.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Cylance's policy is to block everything and requires an active person to monitor and unblock legitimate processes. As updates and software continue to evolve, it is a full-time job to be a Cylance administrator. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a set-and-forget solution that catches threats when they occur and leaves you to focus on your work unimpeded.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
We selected McAfee Enterprise Security Manager because the pricing is competitive in the industry. It is very reliable. The vendor offers good support in real time. Offers the results that we have been looking for. The ability to get the logs may be of last 2 years in a matter of seconds. The ability to retain logs for a very long time.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easily scaled from small orgs to giant enterprises.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Reduced incidents of security breaches lead to lower remediation costs and avoid potential financial losses and reputational damage.
  • Reduces the need for additional third-party security solutions and training, thereby lowering overall security management costs.
  • Increased efficiency and productivity of IT staff lead to better allocation of resources and cost savings.
  • Reduces the risk of fines and sanctions associated with non-compliance, ensuring business continuity and protecting revenue.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Centralisation of events form NIDS/IPS/IDS, Firewall(s), Web Proxy and Endpoint
  • Ability to have third party management
  • Actively upgraded product with good vendor support
Read full review
ScreenShots

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots

Screenshot of blocked activitiesScreenshot of Detects & respondsScreenshot of discovers vulnerabilityScreenshot of Eliminates blind spotsScreenshot of Risk management