Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trellix Change Control

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

222 Reviews and Ratings

Trellix Change Control

1 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	Score8.7 out of 10	N/A	Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management.	$2.50 per user/per month
McAfee Change Control	Score8 out of 10	N/A	Trellix Change Control (formerly McAfee, or Solidcore S3 Control) delivers continuous, enterprise-wide detection of authorized changes as they occur. It blocks unauthorized changes to critical system files, directories, and configurations while streamlining the implementation of new policies and compliance measures.	N/A

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

McAfee Change Control

Academic: $2.50
per user/per month
Standalone: $5.20
per user/per month

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	McAfee Change Control
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	McAfee Change Control
Considered Both Products	Microsoft No answer on this topic	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answer on this topic
	Would buy again
	98% Would buy again 117 Answers	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	98% Delivers good value for the price 109 Answers	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	94% Happy with the feature set 113 Answers	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	98% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 96 Answers	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
95% Implementation went as expected 103 Answers	No answers on this topic

Features

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

McAfee Change Control

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Trellix Change Control
Feature	Microsoft Defender for Endpoint 8.3 56 Ratings 3% below category average	Trellix Change Control - Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology	7.753 Ratings	00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	9.155 Ratings	00 Ratings
Centralized Management	8.955 Ratings	00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	7.110 Ratings	00 Ratings
Infection Remediation	9.454 Ratings	00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	7.352 Ratings	00 Ratings
Malware Detection	8.855 Ratings	00 Ratings

User Ratings
	Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	McAfee Change Control
Likelihood to Recommend	8.4 (99 ratings)	8.0 (1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.4 (8 ratings)	8.0 (1 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	9.0 (5 ratings)	7.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	McAfee Change Control
Likelihood to Recommend	Microsoft Because of its integration with Windows, it is very easy to deploy and manage. Any IT department should be able to leverage the software and interface. The admin portal provides weighted recommendations that comprise the Secure Store, offering admins, security teams, and business owners valuable insights into their security footprint without requiring a strong security background. The software would be ideal for small and mid-sized businesses that cannot dedicate resources to security. Larger enterprises would also benefit, but may require the enhanced license. Incentivized Michael Miller IT Engineer Read full review	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answers on this topic
Pros	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answers on this topic
Cons	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answers on this topic
Usability	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answers on this topic
Performance	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Microsoft The first time I tried to onboard my macOS endpoints to MDE I struggled for quite a bit. I had to reach out to Microsoft's MDE support team. The tech was very helpful in walking me through the steps during a screen share session Incentivized Joe Aldeguer IT Director Read full review	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answers on this topic
Scalability	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Microsoft Reduced incidents of security breaches lead to lower remediation costs and avoid potential financial losses and reputational damage. Reduces the need for additional third-party security solutions and training, thereby lowering overall security management costs. Increased efficiency and productivity of IT staff lead to better allocation of resources and cost savings. Reduces the risk of fines and sanctions associated with non-compliance, ensuring business continuity and protecting revenue. Incentivized Carlos Eduardo Faquinello IT Solutions Architect Read full review	Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) No answers on this topic
ScreenShots	Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots