TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Norton Small Business

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management.

    $2.50

    per user/per month

    Norton Small Business

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ACybercriminals increasingly target small businesses because they expect it to be easy. Norton Small Business is an antivirus service available as a subscription for protecting a multitude of endpoints, from NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec).

    $99.99

    per year

    Pricing
    Microsoft Defender for EndpointNorton Small Business
    Editions & Modules
    Academic
    $2.50
    per user/per month
    Standalone
    $5.20
    per user/per month
    5 Devices
    $99.99
    per year
    10 Devices
    $149.99
    per year
    20 Devices
    $249.99
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Defender for EndpointNorton Small Business
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft Defender for EndpointNorton Small Business
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
    Norton is much much more expensive and difficult to use. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easy to use and can be operated by a new joiner as well.
    Incentivized
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    98%
    Would buy again
    117 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    109 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    113 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    96 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    103 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Microsoft Defender for EndpointNorton Small Business
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Norton Small Business
    Feature
    Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
    8.3
    56 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Norton Small Business
    -
    Ratings
    Anti-Exploit Technology7.753 Ratings00 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.155 Ratings00 Ratings
    Centralized Management8.955 Ratings00 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support7.110 Ratings00 Ratings
    Infection Remediation9.454 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management7.352 Ratings00 Ratings
    Malware Detection8.855 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft Defender for EndpointNorton Small Business
    Small Businesses
    Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Norton 360
    Score7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Watchguard Endpoint Security
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Malwarebytes
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ESET PROTECT
    Score9.1 out of 10
    AVG AntiVirus Business Edition
    Score7.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Defender for EndpointNorton Small Business
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.4
    (99 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.4
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft Defender for EndpointNorton Small Business
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Because of its integration with Windows, it is very easy to deploy and manage. Any IT department should be able to leverage the software and interface. The admin portal provides weighted recommendations that comprise the Secure Store, offering admins, security teams, and business owners valuable insights into their security footprint without requiring a strong security background. The software would be ideal for small and mid-sized businesses that cannot dedicate resources to security. Larger enterprises would also benefit, but may require the enhanced license.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    We are a small company; Norton Small Business gives us the freedom for our remote employees to work securely using their personal laptop /smartphone. Less appropriate: Someone with a few separate locations that require separate cybersecurity environment but would still benefit from centralized management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • One, it's crazy lightweight, so compared to some of the competitors that we also have used with our security services, it's really lightweight and so I don't have a lot of overhead on the system that it's running on.
    • It does really fantastic PowerShell integration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    • Effective Outcomes
    • Transparent & Customised Pricing
    • Ease of Use
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • So the fact that Defender for Endpoint still works with signatures is actually, I don't know, a little difficult for us because, I mean, since Microsoft trusts those signatures, you can easily inject code. And we've done it many times. To show that you can inject code through vulnerabilities like CV 2013, 99, and 33 but still keep the signature. So because of the trust of those signatures, the malware just kind of slides into the environment without Defender knowing. That's the first part. The second part is that the behavioral analysis is not precisely its Prime. It's not Defender's best capability for endpoints. So, Defender does not identify all behaviors considered by other EDRs in the market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    • perfectly works for us, nothing as of now
    • works as expected, found reasonable for us
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    Cost add-ons for Security features is nickel and diming the process to keep pace with cybercrime. Limited Education budgets require us to be more pro-active in finding cost-effective measures to protect our devices, staff and students. Defender is a strong, well-featured product that is pricing itself out of the education market
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Microsoft
    It offers multiple security features and integrates well with Microsoft ecosystems. A workflow for threat detection, investigation, automated remediation, and a centralized dashboard is an added advantage. This application is mainly designed for experienced users; new users may feel challenged.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    It's good for a small business that needs cybersecurity without needing to spend a lot of money. Besides being affordable it seems to be extremely, reliable, and easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Defender for Endpoint chugs along just fine no matter what we throw at it and what systems it's running on. It doesn't take up a lot of resources either, so that's welcomed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easy on memory and resources on clients.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    The first time I tried to onboard my macOS endpoints to MDE I struggled for quite a bit. I had to reach out to Microsoft's MDE support team. The tech was very helpful in walking me through the steps during a screen share session
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    Deployment was handled by our team here and everything went pretty smoothly. We did have a few hiccups in our test group, but that only took a bit to get ironed out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Cylance's policy is to block everything and requires an active person to monitor and unblock legitimate processes. As updates and software continue to evolve, it is a full-time job to be a Cylance administrator. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a set-and-forget solution that catches threats when they occur and leaves you to focus on your work unimpeded.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    We did not actively consider any other software. Overall we did do a basic understanding of a pricing & features and found that the offerings from Symantec were better than others even prima facie. At the current time for an organisation such as ours we do not believe that there is any other option worth active consideration
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easily scaled from small orgs to giant enterprises.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Reduced incidents of security breaches lead to lower remediation costs and avoid potential financial losses and reputational damage.
    • Reduces the need for additional third-party security solutions and training, thereby lowering overall security management costs.
    • Increased efficiency and productivity of IT staff lead to better allocation of resources and cost savings.
    • Reduces the risk of fines and sanctions associated with non-compliance, ensuring business continuity and protecting revenue.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
    • Money saved on cybersecurity products
    • Time saved: ease of use
    • Reliable
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots

    Screenshot of blocked activitiesScreenshot of Detects & respondsScreenshot of discovers vulnerabilityScreenshot of Eliminates blind spotsScreenshot of Risk management