MiContact Center vs. OpenText CX-E Voice

I handle all of our new hires for our company. Its easy for me to set them up and get them connected if mitel is loaded on their devices. I always encourage them to use this is their work flow.

Incentivized

When you have a small team, this works best. because you can't pay like a big organisation but still need the same features. OpenTeam brings us the best features of call-centre software, but at a cut price that we can afford and create revenue upon. This is an essential software, if anything.

Incentivized

• Call forwarding
• Voicemail
• Detailed contact list

Incentivized

• Allow callers to leave a message or callback number and automatically reroute calls based on queue length and waiting time.
• We can build teams and use remote workers at the same time from different time zone.

Incentivized

• Can be little economic
• Hustle to find the right analysis
• Support can be improved

• Provide more transcription service options. Specifically AWS.
• I think reports are severely lacking. Provide a mechanism for customers to create custom reports or allow odbc access to the database.
• Provide better API documentation.

Incentivized

Apart from reports, OpenText CX-E Voice ease of use is consistently excellent

Incentivized

- Great Tool for contact center who would like to have all the processes under single roof - Premium features and best analytics to understand the process metrics - We have been able to onboard new joiner's easily without much support form the MITEl team and they have been working ever since.

OpenText CX-E Voice voicemail is significantly easier to deploy and maintain

Incentivized

• Overall Support system
• Great NPS score
• No dropped calls

• Excellent Consistency
• High Scalability
• Complex to handle

Incentivized