LiveVox CCaaS vs. Zoom Contact Center

LiveVox CCaaS is definetly the better option when comparing to other platforms that handle the same task. One of the main reasons that I love using the platform compared to products like Encore is that the audio isn't constantly buffering, unlike Encore if you have a failed internet connection the call does not stop or require you to reload the audio.

Perfect for companies that have agents all over the place, e.g., different offices or WFH. Also good for companies that aren't big enough to have a "phone guy" as this platform allows IT to do the phone work as it doesn't require esoteric knowledge like other phone systems.

• It provides all-in-one platform for calls, emails, SMS and chat interactions with customers.
• It has in built compliance controls for regulatory frameworks such as TCPA and CFPB. It has consent management tool as well.
• It gives agents access to notes from previous customer interactions. If a CX is calling about an unresolved issue, the agents are aware why CX is calling and can get into resolving the issue without again asking customer about the issue they are facing.

Incentivized

• Customer service - Whether for sales, setup, or technical assistant, their team is always patient, informed, and helpful.
• Cutting Edge - Every month there are a plethora of new or enhanced features that are well thought, tested, and ready for implementing.
• Stability - Our uptime is important to our clients. As a 24/7 365 day/year contact center, having confidence that Zoom's systems are up and running means our clients have trust in our abilities to service their calls.

Incentivized

• Some reporting features can be simplified (being able to determine if the member or agent releases the call).
• Enable video recording during the calls.

• The Teams dashboard for monitoring agents needs some customization options.
• Friendly names, I would like to be able to name a number and when it rings you can see the name of the number.
• Point flows at flows would be nice, instead of flows to queues only.

Incentivized

It does a very good job with agent tracking, workforce management, productivity tracking and availability tracking. Since it has inbuild compliance tools and controls, it eliminates any regulatory risks associated with calling, consent, etc. It has a decent in built reporting that helps plan the workforce.

Incentivized

First and foremost for our results, the omnichannel approach and ease of use on the internal side (agents, supervisors and administrators) have made adoption very simple, we have managed to reduce response times (SLA) and internal communication has become very fluid. We get good feedback from our clients for having implemented ZCC in the company to serve them.

Incentivized

Incentivized

Microsoft Teams was very difficult. Many third-party providers didn't understand the integration and capabilities of the systems. The Teams app is very clunky, and you can get very different capabilities and compatibility when using it between Mac and PC environments. Zoom had a local team that could help with the transition directly, which is very valuable

Incentivized

• This has made our time evaluating calls more efficient.
• Being able to open multiple tabs and calls allow you to easily multitask when you have to review multiple calls at the same time.

• Intuitive, Easier and almost effortless to maintain.
• Lesser Operational Expenses that the alternative we also have
• We wish it has a better integration with Zoom Phone, in terms of channels integration (Voice and Chat) to quick identify callers.
• It is missing "modular" programming to "reuse" Existing Flows and call them from other flows then return to the main flow.
• It is missing the capability to compartmentalizing different teams/groups related to reporting, admin, and global parameters.