Lever vs. Oorwin

Managing pipeline and candidate communication is easy through lever. Keeping it all in one place allows the hiring teams to be in the loop real-time. The reporting is clunky and basic, however, and without a 3rd party tool, sourcing from the lever database is difficult. Also, it is very easy to have duplicate candidates since the alerts Lever gives are often incorrect

Incentivized

Oorwin is very automated ATS system and once jobs will be posted over vms portal it will add directly here in the Oorwin.Sometime parsing will not work correctly that’s the major issue I have ever.also need to interstate the beeline vms also in the Oorwin currently it was not supporting Dotstaff and Beeline in Oorwin so we need to add the requirement manually

Incentivized

• Great integration: Keeps a list of Outlook email communication along with LinkedIn and other data sources
• Is fairly lively, not too much lag between screens even though it is looking through a lot of data.
• Has excellent reporting on how well each email message is working.

Incentivized

• Resume searching
• Job posting
• Onboarding
• Monthly and weekly reports
• Performance review

Incentivized

• It would be nice if we were provided a more detailed summary of why our referrals were not selected for a position.
• The feedback feature that interviewers can give on candidates is great, but it is sometimes hard to find again after completion.
• If there is a mobile version, better marketing/awareness on this would be helpful.

Incentivized

• It will normally work smooth in very higher speed so sometime whenever we have poor connection it’s hard to fetch candidate.
• Need to improvement for c2c vendor list

Incentivized

It isn't difficult to use for the applicant processing, but [I feel] if you want to pull reports or use their tools, good luck!

What support? - Add a ticket and get links to [I believe] their unhelpful user guide. Add a charge if you want better support - afterward just got those links faster...

I think Lever stacks up fairly well and is right above the midpoint. iCIMS and Greenhouse provide a larger, more Enterprise style product for huge scale, so I'd put the two of them above Lever at this time, but we chose Lever over Greenhouse for a reason. I just don't know if we'd be able to scale to the size we'd want to long-term with their product suite. Compared to the others listed here, and many others, I would take Lever every time.

Incentivized

I had used Ceipal and JobDiva before and I found the Oorwin much interactive than the other .Its very easy to learn and train to the new hires .We can send the timesheet and invoice through the Oorwin. JobDiva is also more costly than the Oorwin and Ui is also not much interactive in JobDiva.

Incentivized

• We have an ATS now and did not have one before
• LinkedIn integration is better than others I've seen
• Spend too much time researching unhelpful user guides since their support is terrible
• Lots of frustration with post implementation support
• Integrations break, tools don't work and settings fail which could lead to other issues

• It’s very less time consuming for end to end recruitment process and saves lots of time of recruiter.
• It’s not so costly
• We will get very less response through mass emailing to candidates
• Most of the time email sent through Oorwin went in spam so less response

Incentivized