Lever vs. MightyRecruiter

Managing pipeline and candidate communication is easy through lever. Keeping it all in one place allows the hiring teams to be in the loop real-time. The reporting is clunky and basic, however, and without a 3rd party tool, sourcing from the lever database is difficult. Also, it is very easy to have duplicate candidates since the alerts Lever gives are often incorrect

Incentivized

MightyRecruiter works very well in my sphere of recruiting i.e., manufacturing personnel. This includes upper management level and lower level personnel (skilled tradespersons). Since my headhunting efforts are focused on this area, I cannot comment on other areas. I have used many such services such as Monster or CareerBuilder, but I find this to be the better service.

Incentivized

• Great integration: Keeps a list of Outlook email communication along with LinkedIn and other data sources
• Is fairly lively, not too much lag between screens even though it is looking through a lot of data.
• Has excellent reporting on how well each email message is working.

Incentivized

• Posting jobs to the job seekers
• Filtering the resumes by companies

Incentivized

• It would be nice if we were provided a more detailed summary of why our referrals were not selected for a position.
• The feedback feature that interviewers can give on candidates is great, but it is sometimes hard to find again after completion.
• If there is a mobile version, better marketing/awareness on this would be helpful.

Incentivized

• Lamentably the occupations posted in the page does not have the advancement what I had expected, I imagine that as a result of this some post may lose with alternate ones. I might want to demand to the mediators on the off chance that they look that.
• Undoubtedly your activity opportunities will obtain may applicants, and the stage truly inspires you to be as particular as conceivable as itemized as you can in regards to the position, the set of working responsibilities and other screening data. your activity post may enormously influence the nature of leads, so better be as point by point and particular.

Incentivized

It isn't difficult to use for the applicant processing, but [I feel] if you want to pull reports or use their tools, good luck!

What support? - Add a ticket and get links to [I believe] their unhelpful user guide. Add a charge if you want better support - afterward just got those links faster...

I think Lever stacks up fairly well and is right above the midpoint. iCIMS and Greenhouse provide a larger, more Enterprise style product for huge scale, so I'd put the two of them above Lever at this time, but we chose Lever over Greenhouse for a reason. I just don't know if we'd be able to scale to the size we'd want to long-term with their product suite. Compared to the others listed here, and many others, I would take Lever every time.

Incentivized

CareerBuilder works like a diamond for non-IT, fund, designing, and pharma enterprises. It has in excess of 45+ a large number of resumes from every one of the enterprises. Its valuing is the best when contrasted with different entrances. Beast is the best and best gateway, each IT advisor accessible on that entrance is proficient, and we can without much of a stretch channel the resumes. Beast gave us a ton of terminations. In reality it is the best to locate the coveted applicant and send letters warnings.

Incentivized

• We have an ATS now and did not have one before
• LinkedIn integration is better than others I've seen
• Spend too much time researching unhelpful user guides since their support is terrible
• Lots of frustration with post implementation support
• Integrations break, tools don't work and settings fail which could lead to other issues

• It actually made more work for me in the long run but since it was the free version, there was really no investment

Incentivized