JW Player (or JWP) is a video platform boasting 40,000 broadcasters, publishers, and other video-driven brands whose business relies on video as users. It provides these companies with a way to accelerate and scale their video strategy and is a video platform that can be used to stream video, engage audiences on any screen, and monetize content.
N/A
Moovly
Score7 out of 10
N/A
Moovly aims to enable users to create videos in any style without being an expert. Moovly's drag-and-drop interface lets users combine media objects from their libraries with the user's own uploaded media, as well as animate, synchronize, and time all objects in a timeline. Export content in any video format for online publishing, social media, projection, television, smartphone, or tablet. Moovly also includes more than a million royalty-free media objects to use freely. …
N/A
Pricing
JW Player
Moovly
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JW Player
Moovly
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
JW Player
Moovly
Video Marketing
Comparison of Video Marketing features of JW Player and Moovly
Feature
JW Player
8.6
2 Ratings
14% above category average
Moovly
8.0
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Support for advertisements
9.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video SEO
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video personalization
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of JW Player and Moovly
Feature
JW Player
7.8
3 Ratings
13% below category average
Moovly
8.0
1 Ratings
10% below category average
Video access controls
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
User management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video link sharing
7.03 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
External video
6.02 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Internal video
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of JW Player and Moovly
Feature
JW Player
7.0
3 Ratings
19% below category average
Moovly
-
Ratings
Player customization
2.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Embedded videos
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile compatibility
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Analytics
Comparison of Video Analytics features of JW Player and Moovly
Feature
JW Player
1.0
3 Ratings
155% below category average
Moovly
-
Ratings
Per viewer tracking
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Per video tracking
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video analytics dashboard
1.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Hosting, Management & Storage
Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of JW Player and Moovly
JW Player has flexible plans that won't cost you a lot of money. If you are a startup, JW offers a variety of plans that will suit your specific needs and grow with you as your company grows. You do not need to be a video expert to understand how to upload a video, which allows nearly anyone in the office to do it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It would really depend on the use case if I am going to recommend Moovely to someone else. There are just situations where a stand-alone software just makes more sense. However, I would recommend Moovely over other web-based products on the sheer amount of access of options for stock images/video, compared to some others on the market right now.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just made the decision to renew given demonstrated improvements being made to the platform to expand compatibility for its player use on devices such as Apple TV, as well as improvements made recently to its JW Platform Dashboard
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reliability and compatibility on a majority of platforms. Would have received a 10 except recent versions of browsers such as Firefox are now defaulting against Flash components and thus prompting approval from users BEFORE loading which is a HUGE obstacle to an effective user experience thus creating concerns by end-users unnecessarily and risking that they will NOT accept the prompts, thus leaving unable to view video content hosted using the JW Player. Assurances by JW support suggest they will resolve this, so we'll see...
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Support is reasonable. I from time to time have made suggestions on improvements that would be nice to see (like the ability to have a clickable link within the video - that is easy to create, without tons of coding) and it seems as though I never see it happen or get much response to "suggestions" to upgrade the software. The good news, other than a few things as I mentioned above, overall, I don't have many "technical issues" in the platform, which is a good thing. On occasion, I have seen some "issues" with the delivery of the video, but it has been pretty scarce. So it is dependable.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
One of the primary features promoted by JW Platform is its SEO definition. However, there did not seem to be a way to integrate that data to our platform if selected thus only leaving the benefits of that data to be established on the individual video page hosted by JW Platform, which isn't useful in the end to the client value we are trying to deliver for our VideoproFile.net solution
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
JW had more player options, a better/more intuitive user interface, was altogether faster both in rendering the uploaded videos and in time to load on the web page. The integration with OpenX for pre-roll was faster and easier than with Brightcove, and lastly, they offered a great price for service.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info