Jotform Enterprise is a digital workspace productivity tool that provides a platform for organizations. The aim of Jotform Enterprise is to give companies an easy-to-navigate tool that makes reaching out to customers, collaborating with coworkers, and collecting e-signatures and data a more seamless process. Jotform Enterprise strives to enable companies to make data-driven decisions without compromising when it comes to quality and security. It doesn’t matter what type of…
$0
KeldairHR
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Hyrell is a cloud-based applicant tracking system. Its capabilities include batch or mass communication with potential candidates via multiple channels like email, social recruiting, and job boards, employee screening and testing, resume parsing, data management, and analytics.
$299
per month
Pricing
Jotform
KeldairHR
Editions & Modules
Free
$0.00
Bronze
$34.00
Monthly
Silver
$39.00
Monthly
Gold
$99.00
Monthly
Enterprise
Custom
Up to 5 Open Jobs
$299
per month with an annual agreement
Up to 10 Open Jobs
$499
per month with an annual agreement
Up to 20 Open Jobs
$799
per month with an annual agreement
Up to 30 Open Jobs
$1049
per month with an annual agreement
More then 30 Open Jobs
Contact Company
per month with an annual agreement
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jotform
KeldairHR
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Pay for the number of open positions you plan to have and you get unlimited users, all the core features, unlimited applicants, and unlimited storage.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jotform
KeldairHR
Features
Jotform
KeldairHR
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
8.0
143 Ratings
0% above category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Survey templates
8.6122 Ratings
00 Ratings
Themes
7.4129 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
8.2135 Ratings
00 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
7.6
135 Ratings
11% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Changes to live survey
7.6114 Ratings
00 Ratings
Question design help
7.5111 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple question types
7.8132 Ratings
00 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
7.3
111 Ratings
12% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Survey logic flexibility
7.3111 Ratings
00 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
7.5
137 Ratings
8% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Response tracking
7.6128 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data export
7.9130 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.7116 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.4108 Ratings
00 Ratings
Analytics
7.2102 Ratings
00 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
7.4
112 Ratings
16% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Access controls
7.3108 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance
7.4102 Ratings
00 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
7.0
84 Ratings
16% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Vendor-offered crowdsourcing
7.066 Ratings
00 Ratings
Respondent restrictions
7.184 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
We use it for mostly community surveys and I absolutely prefer it over any other survey program out there. It is easy to create, easy to understand and easy to navigate. I love the QR code option it creates for you to share your form/ survey with others. It really is the best out there!
It is great at getting applicants to apply. The one down side is that a majority of our applicants are applying from a mobile device so they are unable to complete the entire application process. When you send them a link to complete the rest of the application from a desktop computer, many do not have access to this. Because of this, they do not answer some of the "weed out" questions that give us insight as to what type of employee they would be.
Automatic position posting has increased our exposure drastically as an employer. We have increased our applicant flow by over 100%.
Hyrell's applicant communication features have allowed us to stay engaged with candidates during every step of the hiring process. It makes for a very professional first impression.
I love that Hyrell is user-friendly. The system is incredibly easy to use. We have a high number of users throughout nine locations with varying skill levels utilizing technical applications. All of our users seemed to catch on very quickly.
The main issue I have with the system is that in order for a template update to take effect, it has to be re-posted (at least that's the process as I understand it.) For example, I have updated one of our existing job templates to include a new hard skill question. The template is posted in over 50 locations and in order for this update to go into effect, I have to manually re-post these positions which can be very time consuming. If there was a way to automatically update a posting with template changes it would be a huge help to our business.
As a seasoned user who relies on seamless online forms for a multitude of purposes, I can confidently attest that JotForm has not only simplified the form creation process but has also elevated it to new heights.JotForm's interface is a masterpiece of intuitive design. Even if you're a newcomer to the world of online form creation, the platform's user-friendly layout will have you crafting professional-grade forms in no time.
Meets all expectations for application processing. Does a great job of pushing the job ad out to multiple online job boards. Provides good email alerts. Relatively easy to use even for my supervisors who are only in the system on occasion.
I honestly have not used the support feature with Jotform. From what I can see when I look information up, everything I want to do something that I can't figure out myself it seems to not be a possible solution or edit that Jotform is currently capable of.
I have never had to wait for response. Someone always speaks directly to me, sometimes more than once, and email follow-up keeps the issue in the field of vision until there is a resolution.
the most valuable things that Jotform give free trial, so the resistant users can get the experiences of the easiness and more handling to the digital things
Typeform is better hands down [in my opinion]. It's not even a comparison as [I feel] JotForm doesn't work properly and [from my experience I think] their support is very problematic. I would suggest using Typeform or using GravityForms as an alternative to JotForm. Whatever you do, [I feel you shouldn't] depend on JotForm for something that is important to your business or research project.
Hyrell came up against ClearFit and ZipRecruiter. ClearFit looked very strong, but ultimately its pay per posting model didn't provide enough cost certainty. ZipRecruiter seems to be a strong player too. There was a lot of flash with ZipRecruiter but the product didn't seem as complete where it mattered for my client. Hyrell was a good balance on feature set and provided good value. The client needed something that was easy to use so they could get up and running quickly. The Hyrell trial went well and the ramp up was very quick and easy. Hyrell's subscript plans fit my clients needs starting with the Solo plan (3 active jobs) and then quickly moving up to the Small Business plan (9 active jobs) after a few months once additional hiring managers came on-board.
Hyrell has kept us moving, tracking and hiring strong candidates, even has we have moved from hiring 1 or 2 people a month to 3 or 4 a week! Great program, good features and fantastic supportl (Thanks, Emily!!!)
It saved me time. Within minutes I was able to create and share forms to collect demographic data.
While struggling to use another software, I thought of Jotform and it was able to assist me with collating the data I had to confirm results previously obtained.
I could not easily identify what new information was provided in a resubmission by a respondent.