Infocon Systems vs. Mule ESB

They provide flexible edi platform that support EDI setup with any trading partner. They can integrate with any erp for any industry

Well Suited for:

• REST APIs.
• Rapid API Development.
• Most suitable for integration with SFDC.
• Batch processing.
• Parallel processing.

Less appropriate for:

• Integration with Database.
• Exposing SOAP services.
• Small organizations, because it is super costly.

Incentivized

• Integrated with our ERP
• Quick setup for Domain
• Excellent Customer Support

• As an ESB it provides great flexibility to add/remove systems in the integration easily. Highly scalable.
• Supports any kind of system to be integrated, Supports Java.
• Lightweight.

Incentivized

• Some improvement for mobile device

• Logging the Database query in production with out changing the log4j level

Incentivized

Infocon Systems made our work so easy and reduced our manual work so we are giving more time to our core business. No we can exchange our documents quickly and safely to our customers without any error. Order processing is become so easy. They reduced our paper work and Labor work

Due to responsive platform and strong technical support

Hands down, Mule is more cost-effective than Informatica, either on-prem or cloud, and the value only goes up form there. Reusability and ease of creation makes in-house training simple and the end result is we leverage Mule for much more than what we initially considered it for. Having used Oracle and TIBCO before as well, I find they are the tools of yesterday, not able to keep up in terms of functionality or price. Jitterbit would be a more relevant comparison, but Mule won out in the bake-off we did between them.

Incentivized

• Provide value for Money

• Created a means to have a synergy with developers - quickly made us productive
• Ease of integration with Mule connectors - quicker releases
• Initial configuration was a challenge. Would have been more challenging without Mule Support

Incentivized