TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Storage Protect

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AIBM Storage Protect (formerly IBM Spectrum Protect, or Tivoli Storage Manager) provides data resilience for physical file servers, virtual environments, and applications. Organizations can scale up to manage billions of objects per backup server.N/A

    Quest Rapid Recovery

    Score5 out of 10
    N/AQuest Rapid Recovery is a data backup and restore offering from Dell. It provides virtual standby, encryption, replication, deduplication, and the ability for users to run without restore.

    $1,819.99

    Pricing
    IBM Storage ProtectQuest Rapid Recovery
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    License + 1 Year 24/7 Maintenance
    1,819.99
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Storage ProtectQuest Rapid Recovery
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM Storage ProtectQuest Rapid Recovery
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Quest Software
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    86%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    86%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM Storage ProtectQuest Rapid Recovery
    Data Center Backup
    Comparison of Data Center Backup features of IBM Storage Protect and Quest Rapid Recovery
    Feature
    IBM Storage Protect
    7.9
    5 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Quest Rapid Recovery
    8.6
    7 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Universal recovery8.03 Ratings6.05 Ratings
    Instant recovery8.05 Ratings3.05 Ratings
    Recovery verification8.03 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Business application protection8.03 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Multiple backup destinations8.04 Ratings10.06 Ratings
    Incremental backup identification8.04 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    Backup to the cloud8.01 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Deduplication and file compression8.04 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    Snapshots8.02 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    Flexible deployment8.01 Ratings8.03 Ratings
    Management dashboard7.04 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Platform support7.05 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Retention options7.05 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Encryption9.04 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Storage ProtectQuest Rapid Recovery
    Small Businesses
    BDRShield
    Score6.4 out of 10
    BDRShield
    Score6.4 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Cove Data Protection
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Cove Data Protection
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Bacula Enterprise
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Bacula Enterprise
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Storage ProtectQuest Rapid Recovery
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (10 ratings)
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.2
    (5 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Storage ProtectQuest Rapid Recovery
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    IBM Storage Protect is well-suited for large heterogenous environments, with skilled IT staff on-hand. You need a person (or group of people) to monitor day-to-day operations, tweak schedules where needed and be mindful of things that might go wrong. It is also well-suited if you have other IBM products that integrate well with Storage Protect, like Storage Protect Plus or IBM Defender. It is less suited for small companies, with only one person responsible for IT. Employing Storage Protect would be overkill and use too much time of the administrator.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quest Software
    AppAssure works well for quick access to point in time backups of Windows machines without having to do a complete restore. The virtual standby function is useful as a disaster recovery or high availability solution. Recent upgrades to the product and rebranding to Rapid Recovery look promising. If your Linux machines are mission [critical] make sure your administrators test restores so they can perform them in a timely manner should the need arise.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Tight integration with Db2. As an IBM product, it works seamlessly with Db2. You can query what is stored in TSM via Db2 itself. You can also use DB scripts to maintain the items being stored there.
    • Like most of its competitors, Tivoli handles deduplication well.
    • Provides a GUI for browsing and maintaining items stored there. I rarely use this feature, due to the next item I will post:
    • Command-line interface directly from my Db2 database servers.
    • Both client and server-side deduplication, compression and encryption are available.
    • If the requirements are zLinux and DB2 support then it's the most solid solution.
    • Can be complex to implement, but once up and running, it is rock-solid and immensely scalable.
    • Scalability is huge. Can be added onto easily.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quest Software
    • Continuous backup with deduplication and compression
    • The P to V function of the software is create. To be able to back up physical machines and create a hot spare on a virtual environment was a great selling point.
    • Can back up physical and virtual (ESX or Hyper-V).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Deployment and configuration is not easy for an unexperienced IBM Spectrum Protect administrator
    • Operations center uses a lot of data and needs a lot of storage for larger environments
    • Have not seen a redbook about it in the past 10 years
    Read full review
    Quest Software
    • Support for newer operating systems (Windows, Linux, VMware) is slow to be added. Usually takes 3-6 months from the new version being released for it to be supported.
    • There is no way to automate the testing of the virtual standby which a lot of comparable products are able to do.
    • The software has a backup type called "base image" which is essentially taking a full backup after an unexpected shutdown of the server. If your servers crash and they are very large, this may impact your storage requirements significantly. They do now have synthetic full backups which alleviate this issue a bit but they are not perfect either.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    Not required, company closed. TSM is not used in my current role at my current job.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quest Software
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    IBM
    In the present, a backup solution is a must-have, but then companies start using a solution for virtual machines, another solution for bare-metal servers, and another solution for their ERP. By using Spectrum Protect you can have all of that in a single pane of glass. This way you can have a simple recovery plan for all your information assets.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quest Software
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    The few times we've called for support we eventually got an answer, but it's IBM and a very big company and getting to a support agent is hard.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quest Software
    In the very few instances we've needed support they have been quick, friendly, knowledgeable, and dedicated to servicing our needs. That has only improved since AppAssure was bought out by Quest.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Quest Software
    Our initial installation really was not optimum. With the help from Dell Profession Services we were able to get our implementation sized correctly and better understand how to get better deduplication results
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    IBM Spectrum Protect is related to the other IBM Spectrum products listed because it is part of the suite and is also the main backup product for backup and restoration of information. With Veeam it is related as they present competence in different lines of technology, often the integration of both tools can be the best solution for clients looking for a successful backup strategy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quest Software
    I've been using Rapid Recovery for the last 6 years and before that we had used Backup Exec, but it was a different implementation as we were still running backups to LTO3 tapes using the full/incremental backup schemes. So Rapid Recovery (AppAssure at the time) was a big change for us, backing up to disk instead with base images and changes. I would assume Backup Exec can do this as well, but haven't used it since switching. NovaBACKUP was a lower cost solution that seemed geared towards smaller and simpler configurations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    IBM
    Not at the moment, but it can leverage the billing outcomes as per the scales.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quest Software
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Tivoli does well running file-level backups, but Exchange is clunky and restores are really hard. With no SharePoint agent, if you use SharePoint you will need another product like AvePoint DocAve. The web-based GUI console is MUCH improved over earlier versions, but you will still need to be a command-line guru to make Tivoli do everything, and local (node) config files still rule. This product was originally ported from Unix and retains may of its 'nix roots.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quest Software
    • AppAssure paid for itself in the first year of usage. A user deleted a major file in our SharePoint sub-site, we used the DocRetriever for SharePoint Console and were able to go back to a particular incremental date and retrieved that file.
    • One of our file shares crashed and we were able to put the physical server on a virtual standby which saved us hours of imaging and restoring of data. This allowed employees to efficiently continue their daily work without much downtime.
    • The offsite replication alone has put an ease on the company in case of any disaster. When Hurricane Sandy hit, we didn't have a solution in place which put us on pins and needles to say the least. But with AppAssure we will be able to have some comfort that all of our mission critical data is being offloaded onto our other sites.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots