TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Sterling Supply Chain Business Network vs. Microsoft BizTalk Server

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Sterling Supply Chain Business Network

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AIBM Sterling Supply Chain Business Network allows users to view all relevant transactions from a single dashboard to quickly pinpoint and assess issues allowing resolution in minutes not hours.N/A

    Microsoft BizTalk

    Score6.3 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    IBM Sterling Supply Chain Business NetworkMicrosoft BizTalk
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Sterling Supply Chain Business NetworkMicrosoft BizTalk
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Sterling Supply Chain Business NetworkMicrosoft BizTalk
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Camel
    Score6.3 out of 10
    Apache Camel
    Score6.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
    Score8 out of 10
    TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Sterling Supply Chain Business NetworkMicrosoft BizTalk
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (7 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Sterling Supply Chain Business NetworkMicrosoft BizTalk
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    IBM Sterling Supply Chain Business is very well suited for medium to large businesses that have a large commercial / B2B customer set, limited technical resources, and very simple standardized integrations with their B2B customers. It might be less appropriate or a fit for brands that have a much more complex tech stack, smaller commercial customer base, and more complete sales/products or options for their clients.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    BizTalk is well suited as middleware. Where you wish to translate an input file into an output file and send it to some endpoint. In our case, we used it to convert and send files to SAP. In many ways, it very flexible, and you can do almost anything you want with it. In many ways, it's a better solution than your SAP XI or PI as middleware, since it's much less expensive, and allows you do interface with non-SAP systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • EDI and Sales Integrations.
    • Reporting and Analytics.
    • Speed of Onboarding/Integrations.
    • Reliability/System Performance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • It is very user friendly. Users can change rules during run time and change workflow.
    • Huge capacity for queueing messages. It supports all types of adapters like Oracle, Salesforce, SMTP, FTP, etc. Also users can built custom adaptors.
    • If users want to dynamically deploy their solution without any downtime, this is a perfect solution. BizTalk will be a good fit, especially for public-facing websites.
    • Well-proven in the market. I used it when developing a website for Virgin Trains, catering more than 800K user requests per day.
    • Helps in load balancing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Poor Exceptions Support/Slow Response from Technical Support.
    • Lack of Customization/Flexibility.
    • Control Tower/Centralized Visibility Could Be Better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Microsoft BizTalk is over engineered for some situtations
    • Microsoft BizTalk can be frustrating to use as it forces you to use the GUI as opposed to code
    • Microsoft BizTalk is very resource intensive to create integrations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    BizTalk will always be required at this hospital.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    The UI / UX is pretty straightforward. It does take some time to configure fully (everything is customized mapping tailored to your business's needs), but once everything is set up, their solution is incredibly reliable. Once it's fully onboarded, it's a very scalable solution for adding more clients and integrations to your business. Technical support could be better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I gave a 7 because this product BizTalk does need time and training to get familiar with the usability and features, it is not that easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    BizTalk Server has been supported for more than 15 years. It is well proven in the market. Microsoft has provided excellent support with technical issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Make sure you have everybody and all depts. On board during testing on test server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    IBM Sterling Supply Chain can be more expensive and complex, and has lower customer and technical service support than some of the other players. Onboarding might be a bit faster with different providers. Other providers might be better for businesses that are still in the earlier stages of their maturity, with regular growth or regular changing business and processes that are not fully established, might find IBM Sterling less of a fit for their operations and integrations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    BizTalk was selected here mainly because it is easy to integrate to a .NET application (most of them are Web Service, WCF SOAP, WCF REST and Web API) and many backend databases are Microsoft SQL Server. Another benefit is that the monitoring job is easy to set up and centralize with other .NET application monitoring jobs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Simplified integrations across a large host of B2B clients.
    • Competitive pricing / Positive ROI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • A positive impact has been the quicker turnaround time of a part request and that part showing up in SAP using Biztalk as middleware.
    • A somewhat negative impact has been the somewhat insufficient error logging/message capture settings that Biztalk provide. This has caused occasional delays when attempted to create parts for the business.
    • A somewhat negative impact has been the need to have a specialized developer who understands Biztalk to troubleshoot issues with the Biztalk and SAP interaction when creating parts, and when adding new fields to the parts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots