IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities vs. VTS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly Tririga) is an integrated workplace management system (IWMS) supporting facilities management, real estate portfolio management, space management, and environmental / energy management.N/A
VTS
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
VTS is an asset management and leasing platform built to provide real-time portfolio analytics to landlords and brokerage firms. VTS allows brokers and landlords to manage deal activity, a desktop or mobile device.
$20,000
per year
Pricing
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesVTS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
VTS
$20,000.00
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesVTS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesVTS
Best Alternatives
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesVTS
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Dotloop
Dotloop
Score 6.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Condo Control
Condo Control
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesVTS
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesVTS
Likelihood to Recommend
Tririga is well suited for companies who want to manage space, projects, and work. It could use some updating in the area of streamling the pop up boxes. In order to get into an area, it could take as many as 5 + areas to get to it, which makes things time consuming.
Read full review
- Perfect for Landlord representation. - Less appropriate for someone doing sales transactions.
Read full review
Pros
  • Diverse categories of requests available
  • Ability to be as descriptive as possible without character limit
  • Ease of mass resource assignment for tasks
  • Ease of mass maintenance task/request printing work orders
  • Clean site layout that is easy to navigate
Read full review
  • VTS shows vacancies and occupied suites well - great for quick reference.
  • Standard "Stage" categories are helpful to group & prioritize.
  • Being able to see the multiple proposals on one screen & view the evolution of the deal is helpful.
Read full review
Cons
  • In order to get into the back end and manage spaces, there are too many "clicks" and pop up boxes to get to the area that is needed, which causes delays and confusions.
  • It can be a bit slow when processing requests, pulling up maps.
  • Trigia holds a lot of information, which is good but it could be easier to get to at times.
Read full review
  • VTS is still growing in its features on retail properties. As a product that originated in the office and broker world, it has had a learning curve for shoppiong centers. It has made great progress in the 2+ years we've been on the system, and there is more to come.
  • The defaults for the dashboards go into a longer time frame than how we look at production and leasing activity. We are year-to-date driven, and that view isn't readily available on the dashboards.
  • We are still working on getting Deal Approval flow active in our organization. We have a two-round approval process, and VTS currently is structured for a single approval round. We are finding ways to make it work, but it's still a workaround.
Read full review
Usability
I give it this rating because it has more than one way to get to most forms but it can be hard to navigate if you don't know the terms TRIRIGA uses. Also being a new developer can bring up issues with not knowing exactly where certain things are found. The documentation doesn't help too much sometimes since the TRIRIGA community is pretty small.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
In the almost 7 months I have been working on my current project there has been exactly one unplanned outage. This was in the QA environment during data migration and was caused by a workflow that was circular and self referencing which caused the processing JAVA memory to spike, not resolve and then crash the server.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
TRIRIGA does a good job of this, being a server based web application it is like other web based systems so it's not as fast as a client server application or a local system but it is very consistent across locations and for different roles and employees. This does allow consistent use no matter where people are located. It also does a fair job of notifying the user when it is loading with the spinning circle or hour glass. The reports can get fairly complex but native TRIRIGA reports perform well even when they are complex. They can be a little slow if they are fetching 100's of 1000's of rows but this doesn't take more than 10 or so seconds. I have yet to write a native report that takes more than 20 seconds and that 20 second report is getting data from 4 BO's and nets over 130K rows.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The process does seem to take some time and has to go through a preset escalation process. IBM does a good job of communicating through the process, it just seems to take it's natural course.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Do research on the client processes and determine which modules need to be implemented and in which order they should be implemented in.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Much faster web based program with more category options and ease of mass batch printing.
Read full review
We looked at a number of products when making the decision to go with VTS. What we found was that most of the other products in the space were either real estate addons to SalesForce, or an additional module to a software that was focused on another use, like accounting or property management. VTS was the only product we reviewed that was born, bred, and focused on commercial real estate. It became apparent that it was best in breed at the time, and they have been aggressive at making product enhancements and continuous improvement to stay the leader in their space.
Read full review
Scalability
TRIRIGA can be split into many servers and is easily scaled over multiple environments. TRIRIGA is also capable of being implemented on multiple operating systems and a wide range of environments with different database management systems. This makes it easy for clients to choose since they can choose vendors they have previous relationships with or are required to use for various reasons.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • TRIRIGA has provided the client with the capability to correct deficiencies in the legacy software and to provide excellent reporting to give management the tools needed to make better informed decisions regarding their company.
  • Negatively it has been a very big draw on resources to implement because the client is trying to implement 5 modules in a 15 month period.
  • Another positive thing TRIRIGA has provided is it has broken objects into separate items that can each be audited. For example the legacy software only tracked one budget amount and if that was changed the system didn't say who or what was changed. TRIRIGA gives a break down of what line item is changed, who did it, and when. Properties can be changed to track what the pre-change and post-change data was. This is a great feature for auditing purposes.
Read full review
  • It allows a small leasing team for the owner to quickly look over the entire portfolio and approve/alter proposals with a variety of brokers in a very efficient way.
  • It allows us to track space encumbrances and availability easily.
  • We've given access to our JV partners, and that has cut the number of conference calls sucking away time from our day by about 70%.
Read full review
ScreenShots