ibi iWay Service Manager vs. Mule ESB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ibi iWay Service Manager
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
ibi™ iWay® Service Manager is an integration server that ensures rapid access to timely, accurate data across all systems, processes, and stakeholders with interoperability between disparate systems and data. With iWay Service Manager, all aspects of an existing infrastructure—every integration, application, and development platform—work in concert with modernized architectures to rapidly develop new business applications, and create reusable business services from existing applications. This…N/A
Mule ESB
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Mule ESB, from Mulesoft, is an open source middleware solution.N/A
Pricing
ibi iWay Service ManagerMule ESB
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ibi iWay Service ManagerMule ESB
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ibi iWay Service ManagerMule ESB
User Ratings
ibi iWay Service ManagerMule ESB
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ibi iWay Service ManagerMule ESB
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Well Suited for:
  • REST APIs.
  • Rapid API Development.
  • Most suitable for integration with SFDC.
  • Batch processing.
  • Parallel processing.
Less appropriate for:
  • Integration with Database.
  • Exposing SOAP services.
  • Small organizations, because it is super costly.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • As an ESB it provides great flexibility to add/remove systems in the integration easily. Highly scalable.
  • Supports any kind of system to be integrated, Supports Java.
  • Lightweight.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Logging the Database query in production with out changing the log4j level
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Hands down, Mule is more cost-effective than Informatica, either on-prem or cloud, and the value only goes up form there. Reusability and ease of creation makes in-house training simple and the end result is we leverage Mule for much more than what we initially considered it for. Having used Oracle and TIBCO before as well, I find they are the tools of yesterday, not able to keep up in terms of functionality or price. Jitterbit would be a more relevant comparison, but Mule won out in the bake-off we did between them.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Created a means to have a synergy with developers - quickly made us productive
  • Ease of integration with Mule connectors - quicker releases
  • Initial configuration was a challenge. Would have been more challenging without Mule Support
Read full review
ScreenShots