HYPR vs. Passly by ID Agent

Hypr is perfect for an office environment where security is paramount. Hypr give staff confidence and is a modern approach to keeping end users secure. Hypr 2fa can't be used when offline. (this is the same for other products in the market though. Hypr has amazing support if you ever need to reach out.

Incentivized

From my experience, Kaseya made a mistake with Passly. It does not work correctly. When it does work it is very delayed causing issues for logging into the system. When Kaseya was contacted they could not find users at all. When they finally found the users they could not edit it needing them to escalate to development to fix accounts.

Incentivized

• Adds security to our network by removing passwords which can be compromised.
• Increases our security posture when applying for cybersecurity coverage.
• Ease of use for end users - staff love it.
• Hypr is modern, fresh and most of all secure.
• Simplifies our users life by not having to remember passwords.
• Removes the need for staff to reset passwords for systems.

Incentivized

• AuthAnvil is simple to use. Whether using an OTP code or push notifications, the application is user-friendly.
• AuthAnvil applications are easy for the end-user to install.
• AuthAnvil is readily available across multiple platforms (Windows, Android, iOS).

Incentivized

• I'd love to begin using Hypr for everything, including SSO - they may already do this but we haven't branched out yet.
• Hypr integrated their control center recently - this was a great move.
• Hosted RADIUS server would be nice instead of us hosting it.

Incentivized

• Web interfaces are relatively complex, not entirely ready for end-users
• Token transfers are slightly cumbersome (e.g. moving from hard to soft-token and vice-versa)
• It remains as a separate, local AD-driven solution, independent from external, rising auth platforms (e.g. Azure)

Incentivized

Simplicity of use combined with price and low system resources.

Incentivized

They are very helpful with helping us with any issues. There are a lot of helpful guides online if you get lost. Kaseya is also good about not bugging you with notifications. Kaseya offers easy to access to support options. Overall I have not had to contact them over a lot of issues. The software rarely broke or was down for maintenance.

Incentivized

Hypr is easier to use that it's competitors. Hypr is better priced that it's competitors. Hypr has better support than it's competitors. Hypr is cooler that it's competitors. Hypr makes security seem very simple and offers peace of mind for end users. Hypr offer many integrations through one easy to use management center portal.

Incentivized

We have transitioned our Multi-Factor authentication processes to use either Authy, Duo, or Microsoft Authenticator, depending on the application use-case. We still have some clients using AuthAnvil, but it is no longer our preferred application for MFA. The other offerings in the market fulfill the same requirement with either lower or no additional cost and are easier to manage and more consistent in their performance.

Incentivized

• We have had great feedback about Hypr
• Staff love using it, as it's a cool feature.
• Hypr is easy to implement.
• We use if for workstation access
• We use it for securing our VPN.
• I have nothing negative to say about Hypr.
• It is costs effective for what we need
• Hypr increases our security posture.

Incentivized

• Using AuthAnvil to log into Kaseya VSA multiple times was definitely a loss in productivity.
• AuthAnvil did provide lots of security for our products because everyone would be deterred by AuthAnvil and Kaseya VSA's labyrinth-like log in process.

Incentivized