BlueConic vs. Hull CDP (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BlueConic
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
BlueConic, the a pure-play customer data platform, designed to liberate companies’ first-party data from disparate systems and makes it accessible wherever and whenever it is required to transform customer relationships and drive business growth. The vendor states over 300 companies use BlueConic to unify data into persistent, individual-profiles, and then activate it across customer touchpoints and systems in support of a wide range of growth-focused initiatives, including customer…N/A
Hull CDP (discontinued)
Score 4.7 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Hull CDP was a real-time rule and action engine that provided SaaS and Ecommerce businesses with more control over their customer data. Hull was acquired by MessageBird in April, 2021, and is no longer available.N/A
Pricing
BlueConicHull CDP (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BlueConicHull CDP (discontinued)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BlueConicHull CDP (discontinued)
Features
BlueConicHull CDP (discontinued)
Tag Management
Comparison of Tag Management features of Product A and Product B
BlueConic
7.0
Ratings
17% below category average
Hull CDP (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Tag library7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Tag variable mapping7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Ease of writing custom tags7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Rules-driven tag execution7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Tag performance monitoring7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Page load times7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app tagging7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of JavaScript extensions7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
BlueConic
7.0
Ratings
16% below category average
Hull CDP (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Website personalization7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Data Management
Comparison of Customer Data Management features of Product A and Product B
BlueConic
7.0
Ratings
19% below category average
Hull CDP (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Account Scoring7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Data Governance7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Connectors6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Enhancement7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Ingestion7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Storage8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Visibility7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Event Data7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Identity Resolution7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Ratings
BlueConicHull CDP (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BlueConicHull CDP (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
BlueConic works well as a central customer database and for building detailed customer profiles. If you want to learn how customers are engaging with your brand and then act on that data, BlueConic is the perfect choice.
Read full review
If you are a fast scaling team using segment and slack, Hull is a must. For your sales reps trying to understand the activity of customers/prospects/users of your applicaiton, there is no easier way to surface that information than using Hull. We've been thoroughly impressed by the wide use cases and integrations Hull can offer and we use it many times a day. 100% would recommend this tool
Read full review
Pros
  • First Party Data Collection
  • First Party Data Targeting
  • First Party Data Analysis
Read full review
  • Good fit for our SME marketing/ Sales Tech stack. Integrations like HubSpot and Clearbit are native and easy to use within Hull- and it was one of the only providers that fit that criteria when we were vetting options.
  • Ease of Use. Hull is fairly intuitive for a casual user. The only real questions that came up for us were doing the data-mapping phase when we mapped fields against Hull.
  • No database to maintain. A critical selling point for us, and something which has freed up a fair amount of engineering time on an ongoing basis has been that Hull, unlike Segment, didn't require us to maintain a database.
Read full review
Cons
  • The software was a bit glitchy at times and the beta products were launched a little too prematurely. I didn't feel like it was tested thoroughly and caused headaches at times.
  • Qualifying the product was and is still probably hard for them. They could easily be confused as testing software (which it works well for) but their go-to-market is personalization... which I don't believe is their strength. It's more like a "real-time Ecomm optimization".
  • Their connections with other providers was left a little more desirable. Would love to have seen them have more connections into CRM that the 4-5 they offered.
Read full review
  • I am not sure about new features, if they are rolling out or what!
  • It might also be valuable to see the responsiveness of things triggered through Hull, sometimes data takes a bit longer than expected to trigger a workflow (but never really more than a minute so not a huge deal really...)
Read full review
Usability
I think without a bit of training and knowledge it would be hard to walk right into a role or a task inside of BlueConic - it is kind of hard to comprehend everything that is available and all of the options. The language inside of BlueConic is also very different than other things in the industry, so it was hard to understand what it would line up with.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
BlueConic is more lightweight and allows for more unique experiences at the same time. Again - this isn't meant to perfect the core UX of your site, but sit on top to deliver unique experiences to control offer management and close rates.
Read full review
We had initially identified Segment as a solution due to the number of integrations they supported. The problem is that with Segment we would have still had to build and maintain a database along with query tools. Overall Hull emerged as a better starting point for us
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Too early to tell. Will report back in a month. If all goes to plan though, massive. We hope subs make up the vast majority of revenues by 2020, which will be powered by BC.
Read full review
  • No ROI. I invested in it for months and promised functionality was never delivered
Read full review
ScreenShots