HeadSpin vs. Perfecto by Perforce

We have been using HeadSpin for our web and mobile application testing. It is an easy-to-use solution that provides detailed and in-depth analytics from the testing results. We also get a wide range of live networks and devices to perform the testing from HeadSpin. It has an inbuilt artificial intelligence engine that helps us to get real-time scenarios simulated, which is very helpful for finding performance issues and improving the overall quality of the applications.

A wide variety of real devices over cloud makes the mobile testing very efficient. Perfecto has a very good automation platform and also has good integration with the open-source tool set.

Incentivized

• We have hundreds of networking devices and headspin makes monitoring all the easier
• it has a great alert system and gives insights into what particularly might have gone wrong
• we use jenkins workflow and headspin works quite well with the pipeline

Incentivized

• Test developers can easily install third Party applications or APK files on the remote devices using their Install widget.
• Perfecto Mobile Cloud provides a Hybrid objects approach, which consists of both Visual (OCR) based objects and native objects for iOS/Android applications.
• Provide 3 different cloud based deployment options as part of their offering.

Incentivized

• UI is very slow and sometimes it is stuck and becomes very difficult to operate and work on
• Functionality to upload build does not function as intended to and lags

Incentivized

• Nothing in particular

Incentivized

Headspin lets you test your code for performance, security, usability, and reliability. It also has some fantastic features that make it easy for developers to understand what's going on in their code. Headspin is a great tool to use when compared to LambdaTest. Headspin supports Appium, Appium Inspector, and Selenium, making it easier than ever before to develop such capabilities. However, LambdaTest offers only Appium and Selenium.

Perfecto has a wide array of mobile devices we can chose from. Automation is easier using OCR technology. The test script generated detailed report of the executed test script at the end with vast variety of information such as actual results, screen captures in digital format, continuous video recording of the entire script and graphs showing statistics about the execution

Incentivized

• Simplified the approach to test the mobile application on multiple devices from different vendors. This helped us to ensure the stability of the application in different environments.
• In-depth analysis to understand the loopholes in the application design function. This helped us to improve the application design and overall user experience.

Incentivized

• Helped automation and hence reduced costs.
• Not cheap so returns take longer time.
• Need extended support and improved usage. any onsite experience with the team here will help you get 1st hand experience.

Incentivized