RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) vs. InEight

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
RSMeans data, from Gordian (formerly Costworks) is a construction and estimation software offering acquired by the Gordian Group in 2014. It includes cost books and construction project estimating software tools.N/A
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
InEight's modular project controls software connects complex project data to improve visibility and delivery in capital construction.N/A
Pricing
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)InEight
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)InEight
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsInEight offers a modular, integrated project controls platform. Because the InEight platform covers the entire construction lifecycle, customers purchase the software based on their specific needs – purchasing stand-alone products, a bundle of products, or the entire platform. As a result, the pricing will vary depending on the specific product, number of users and length of contract. Once InEight has identified the highest impact areas, they offer potential customers a custom proposal. The options they consider include: Per user pricing: typically annual subscriptions. Revenue-based: using a percentage of the customer’s revenue. Project-based: software use dedicated to a specific project or program of work.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)InEight
Features
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)InEight
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
7.8
Ratings
3% below category average
InEight
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Takeoff tools6.00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Job costing9.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Cost databases9.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Cost calculator8.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Bid creation7.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
InEight
7.0
Ratings
9% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Data exportability00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
InEight
6.9
Ratings
9% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Photo documentation00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Jobsite reports00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Document sharing00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
RFI tools00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
As-built drawings00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Mobile app00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Submittal design and management00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Checklists00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Meeting Minutes00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Specifications00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Change orders00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)InEight
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Revit
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Revit
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)InEight
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)InEight
Likelihood to Recommend
Again, CostWorks is very good at developing models of standard industry facilities/buildings, and it does this very accurately and efficiently. It is not a software that I would use to develop a very detailed line-item cost estimate that would possibly need several revisions to it over the course of the estimate deliverable cycle. And it would not be one I would use where the estimate needs to be broken down into phases or areas of construction. It just doesn't have these capabilities, and maybe it shouldn't. However, it is an excellent resource for running along side other estimating softwares in that its database of line-items is one of immense depth and as I stated before, I use it all the time in conjunction with my other client-specified softwares so that I can find line-items that those softwares just do not contain.
Read full review
Compared to other Estimating software I have used, InEight has superior capabilities and features. The ability to use a line item or an assembly to create an estimate is an outstanding feature of the program. The ability to create crew rates and use them in the estimate is a handy feature, especially when estimating construction projects.
Read full review
Pros
  • CostWorks is very good at generating quick and valid estimates for standardized facilities such as office buildings, schools, etc. It allows you to validate other cost estimates at the UniFormat level when doing an estimate validation.
  • CostWorks' database of detailed line-items is a very resourceful asset when it comes to finding a very specific line-item. Sometimes, when using Success or MII, I will have CostWorks open on the other screen so I can find an item that the other softwares just don't have and build it into the other software from the CostWorks entry.
  • CostWorks does a very good job of generating reports that are both well-developed and have enough detail at the summary level to be able to sit with a client or a project manager and have them follow along and understand without being overwhelmed with detail and numbers.
Read full review
  • Tracking labor and equipment hours to specific estimated scope line items
  • Creating detailed work breakdown structures within Estimate and using that same structure to apply cost to during the job
  • Creating custom data blocks in control to track progress and create forecasts
Read full review
Cons
  • small project costs where labor is a bigger portion than materials on cost
  • markup factors on governmental projects
Read full review
  • We do not use the search engine since it was last modified. It is no longer user friendly.
  • We used to like the way we could change the position of line items. The function has been changed to where it is not user friendly anymore.
  • The "Save" and "Delete" options are right next to each other. I have been after Ineight to change these for a long time but they have not.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Some features with InEight's TeamBinder are worthy of single use, however the review feature and subsequent revision and version numbering could be improved. We will be aiming to roll out the package to encompass our internal documentation in the near future and will be in a better position to judge the usability after that point in time.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I would give it an 8 out of 10 because the software can be a bit cumbersome to new users. It also takes a long time to set up the library and input all of your companies needs so that the software will provide the level of service required to estimate projects. However, once the software is set up it is a powerful tool. We only use a portion of what the software is capable of delivering
Read full review
Support Rating
I've never had the need to discuss CostWorks with a vendor.
Read full review
Every time I have contacted support, they have gotten back to [me] quickly and with a few solutions. I like that they seem to be US-based, so there is no language barrier when I try to communicate my problem. For the few times, they did not have a solution ready, they told me they would respond later after further research, and they actually followed up! Better than most support I have used in the past with other software.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Since the original inception, I have been required to overhaul the system so that it is more user friendly and combines both aspects of our business, documentation and drawings. Being able to control revision and version numbering has been a key struggle that only staff training has been able to mark this as complete.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CostWorks is much quicker than manually looking up costs and copying them to a spreadsheet.
Read full review
I've used SAP for more than 10 years before my current job in this company. The best thing in SAP, is exactly what I have commented before, it's a single one tool, that does all what InEight do. Here at CCC, we have COINS for cost management, and I don't know exactly if InEight would be able to do whatever that COINS does, but what I'm trying to say is that, for systems, as much less external communication, better. InEight is covering a great portion on planning, we will see schedule and estimate, it will definitely improve, so, waiting on that to see.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
InEight is a good system that has scaled nicely as the company has grown. the tools are still readily available and applicable for our larger scope of work. It has kept up with the growth of the company very nicely
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Good - it saves a lot of time on producing estimates
Read full review
  • We have gone from an $6.5M per year company to over $10M per year since integrating InEight in 2018
  • Job costing has really helped us to understand where the money is going and how to manage it better.
  • Being able to compare different estimates has sped up the estimation process and allowed us to be more competitive.
Read full review
ScreenShots

InEight Screenshots

Screenshot of InEight Estimate’s Benchmarking feature, which allows users to compare high, low, and average costs, as well as productivity rates from past projects, to visually assess whether current estimates fall within a realistic range. With historical performance data at their fingertips, estimators can bid more strategically and deliver more reliable, data-driven estimates.Screenshot of InEight Estimate’s CBS Register, which provides a user-specific view of an estimate, allowing users to create unlimited WBS structures and custom rollups. With parametric cost item assemblies, estimators can generate more accurate, reliable, and data-driven estimates.Screenshot of InEight Document’s Dashboard, that delivers a centralized, visual view of project information across all modules. Interactive dashboard tiles make it easy to track document activity and maintain visibility into project performance.Screenshot of InEight Document’s Gallery, which offers a comprehensive visual library of all project-related files—including drawings, photos, and documents—so teams can quickly access and manage the content they need from one intuitive location.Screenshot of InEight Schedule’s Risk Management feature, which enables project teams to evaluate schedules through a risk-adjusted lens. By visualizing scenarios with varying confidence levels, teams can anticipate potential impacts and plan with greater certainty.Screenshot of InEight Change’s PCO Summary dashboard that delivers a visual summary of all potential change orders. This helps project teams evaluate impacts, track approvals, and manage changes proactively for better cost and scope control.