GoCD vs. S4 for Salesforce

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GoCD
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
GoCD, from ThoughtWorks in Chicago, is an application lifecycle management and development tool.N/A
S4 for Salesforce
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
GoCDS4 for Salesforce
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GoCDS4 for Salesforce
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GoCDS4 for Salesforce
Best Alternatives
GoCDS4 for Salesforce
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GoCDS4 for Salesforce
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GoCDS4 for Salesforce
Likelihood to Recommend
GoCD is easy to set up. So if you just want to get some pipelines up & running quickly, & they're quite stable, or you can have many pipelines for different needs then GoCD is great. Still, if you only want to have a few pipelines, but with the flexibility to run them with different parameters dynamically, then Jenkins is better.
Read full review
S4 for Salesforce is the best platform for large recruiting firm for recruitment processes and a lot of candidates. CRM provide the best solution for any recruiting firm. Salesforce is well suited in our company because it allows recruiters to store the data of every and each candidate in our system and also we don't have the fear of loosing the data.
Read full review
Pros
  • Pipeline-as-Code works really well. All our pipelines are defined in yml files, which are checked into SCM.
  • The ability to link multiple pipelines together is really cool. Later pipelines can declare a dependency to pick up the build artifacts of earlier ones.
  • Agents definition is really great. We can define multiple different kinds of environments to best suit our diverse build systems.
Read full review
  • Analytics
  • CRM
  • Data storage
Read full review
Cons
  • UI can be improved
  • Location for settings can be re-arranged
  • API for setting up pipeline
Read full review
  • Mobile accessibility
  • Complex UI
  • Cost
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I prefer using GoCD compared to Jenkins. The UI makes sense, I like the simplicity to hit the 'Play' button for a straightforward deployment of the 'Play +' if you need to override some settings when deploying whereas Jenkins, you have the whole page for each pipeline. The environment makes sense but can often confuse the user while GoCD simply has a drop-down to select your environment.
Read full review
In S4 for Salesforce highly integrated with salesforce ecosystem. Salesforce gives capabilities for candidate and client management. In Adapt Bullhorn: Bull horn does not have built in integration. but if provides its own CRM. In SS4 for Salesforce: you can edit, customize the UI according to your needs. In Adapt Bullhorn: it also provides you the customizable Interface but not as much as Salesforce
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • ROI has been good since it's open source
  • Settings.xml need to be backed up periodically. It contains all the settings for your pipelines! We accidentally deleted before and we have to restore and re-create several missing pipelines
  • More straight forward use of API and allows filtering e.g., pull all pipelines triggered after this date
Read full review
  • Helps in Better decision making
  • Improved data storage
  • Adoption and Cost
Read full review
ScreenShots