GetAccept vs. Storylane

GetAccept has shown great progress in the digital electronic signature market, we have had almost no problems since adopting it, although at some point we thought about stopping using the GetAccept server. It is very practical for both the client and the advisor using it. It has a very intuitive interface and the management is amazing.

Incentivized

Basically if you want to provide a walk-through of a website, then Storylane is well suited. I can't think of a scenario where it is less appropriate unless you are trying to use it for something it isn't intended for. I'm not sure if it will work with a WASM page, so if you are working with WASM, you should at least test that out.

Incentivized

• The ability to forward agreements along with a video of me describing the agreements. It makes it more personalized and it's always well received by the recipient.
• You can track in real time when a document has been viewed and for how long.
• You can always reference the history of each client agreement. Easy access.

Incentivized

• Allows you to easily grab the visual assets to create a walk through.
• The analytics that are integrated give you a very specific view of engagement.
• Even the most complex web pages can be saved in Storylane, definitely a robust engine.

Incentivized

• In some cases could be angry that software ask you for feedback many times, for example, when you are filling out a contract
• something that happen occasionally is a little bit complicate find some documents in my screen, I mean if you could improve the way how the recent files appear on the screen could be great. not always happen but it is not good.
• I would love to have templates that allow me create files in a easy way.

Incentivized

• The relationship between "pages" and "steps" can get very confusing if you are having to do a mass revamp of a saved story.
• Some of the interface is less than intuitive than it could be.
• I'm not a fan of mouse over features, I realize it is a modern metaphor, but it's a bad one.

Incentivized

I think it's a good product.

Incentivized

The Customer Support team was responsive. I typically submitted questions while I was using the app and via the web. The FAQ support base was alright. I cannot recall a time when I used that as opposed to connecting with a rep. I believe all communication was via email. Dalius was great at soliciting feedback. I particularly valued him offering support for best practices as it related to more strategic ways to use GetAccept.

Incentivized

Ease of use is very user-friendly in order to work on any task. It has the maximum features as compared to its competitors which are a quite useful and enhanced program that enables in order to do the CRM easy. Also, it provides particular support to the problems which we faced and resolve them asap.

Incentivized

They are both good products and pretty similar. Navattic definitely had some strong features, but with Storylane, they were incredibly responsive to requests for help and feature requests and it just "looked" better. Storylane also "felt" better in terms of working with it. There were some design flow decisions made with Navattic that I found to be a bit counterintuitive.

Incentivized

• It has incredibly increased the efficiency of students' work thanks to the possibility to work remotely with mobile devices.
• GetAccepts has made it possible to create very realistic sales simulations, even if it is not educational software. It is therefore very flexible in its uses.
• The possibility of tracking each page that is viewed helps evaluate what the Client is thinking.

Incentivized

• We were getting thousands of engagements on our Story's.
• We are able to use them as an educational resource when potential clients asked a question.
• The SDR's were able to use them as assets to create interest.

Incentivized