ftrack vs. Progress ShareFile
ftrack vs. Progress ShareFile
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ftrack | N/A | ftrack, a Backlight company headquartered in Stockholm, is a cloud-based project management solution used in the media & entertainment industry to help teams meet the ever-increasing demands of post production. Developed for producers, supervisors, artists and pipeline developers, ftrack boasts a simple user interface for adoption by major creative facilities around the world including: Cinesite, LEGO, Luma Pictures, MPC, The Mill, Mackevision, and O2 Filmes. | $15 per month | |
Progress ShareFile | N/A | ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011. | $17.60 per month per user (minimum 3 users) |
| ftrack | Progress ShareFile | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | 33% discount for Studio and Review for annual subscription. | Discount available for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| ftrack | Progress ShareFile |
|---|
| ftrack | Progress ShareFile | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| File Sharing & Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cloud Storage Security & Administration |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cloud Storage Platform |
|
| ftrack | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Frame.io Score 9.1 out of 10 | SugarSync Score 5.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Asana Score 8.4 out of 10 | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score 9.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Wrike Score 8.3 out of 10 | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score 9.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| ftrack | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 7.8 (0 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (0 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (0 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (0 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (0 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (0 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 6.6 (0 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (0 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (0 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (0 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (0 ratings) |
| ftrack | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Progress ShareFile Screenshots |











