TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FitNesse

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AFitNesse is an open source fully integrated standalone wiki web server and acceptance testing framework.N/A

    LambdaTest

    Score8.6 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    LambdaTest is a Quality Engineering Platform that offers a full-stack testing cloud with 10K+ real devices and over 3,000 browsers for cross-browser and end-to-end testing. With AI-native test management, MCP servers, and agent-based automation, LambdaTest supports Selenium, Appium, Playwright, and all major frameworks. AI Agents like HyperExecute and KaneAI bring AI and cloud into test workflows, enabling automation testing with 100+ integrations. From infrastructure to…

    $19

    per month per user

    Pricing
    FitNesseLambdaTest
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Live
    $19
    per month Parallel Test
    Real Device (Includes Live)
    $35
    per month Parallel Test
    Web & Mobile Browser Automation
    $119
    per month Parallel Test
    Native App Automation
    $149
    per month Parallel Test
    Web & Mobile Browser on Real Device
    $158
    per month Parallel Test
    HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
    $199
    per month Parallel Test
    SmartUI Visual Regression
    $219
    per month Parallel Test
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Parallel Test
    HyperExecute On-Premise
    Custom Pricing
    per parallel test
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FitNesseLambdaTest
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Discount available for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FitNesseLambdaTest
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    LambdaTest Inc.
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Would buy again
    89 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    87 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    91 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    65 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    77 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    FitNesseLambdaTest
    Small Businesses
    BrowserStack
    Score8.6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FitNesseLambdaTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    8.6
    (71 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (23 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (5 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FitNesseLambdaTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    Useful and straightforward. Appian and other low-code BCM tools can be easily integrated. Writing a script for a test is similar to writing a script in English. So simple to use because it's a wrapper class for selenium. FitNesse is being implemented with the goal of doing it correctly the first time. As a result, migrations of both the client and the server are made easier.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    LambdaTest Inc.
    One day, I needed to test a specific issue that was occurring only on Pixel phones. I turned to LambdaTest, quickly identified the problem, and was able to fix it. There hasn't been a situation where I felt LambdaTest didn't help, it's my go-to solution for testing, as it solves many problems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Easy to install.
    • Command language is easy to create custom scripts.
    • FitNesse tests are deterministic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    LambdaTest Inc.
    • Very accessible as multiple users can be added in each subscription
    • Very reliable as it is very close to the actual device when it comes to operating system and version behavior
    • There are a lot of options for devices and browsers that users can choose from when it comes to emulating and testing
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • Logging can help any debug or error issues.
    • A Java/Selenium developer is needed to maintain the FitNesse keyword library.
    • Content.txt and properties.txted need to be added to the test suite in older versions to make it visible in a test run.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    LambdaTest Inc.
    • More real devices should be added like I have Samsung mobile but it was not in the list
    • It takes time in checking the link on LambdaTest if we compare with real mobiles
    • Sometimes exact results are not matching as from real mobiles
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    LambdaTest Inc.
    The reason i have given the 10 points becasue the problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    LambdaTest Inc.
    Because of the ease of use of the platform, we just save a lot of time and effort with this as its a feature rich solution, we just need to upload app binary once and for everytime we need to test on a different device we can just directly install that binary on the device without the pain of reupload.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    LambdaTest Inc.
    yes always available
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    LambdaTest Inc.
    haven't found any glitch while using this
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    LambdaTest Inc.
    The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    LambdaTest Inc.
    Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    The FitNesse testing automation framework is very simple to operate. It is simple to connect with the Jenkins and Bamboo environments. It is dependable, and it is simple and quick to include new tests. The process of debugging and fixing test failures is straightforward. FitNesse, including its installation, may be utilized with a minimum of fuss and difficulty. Maintaining scripts and monitoring their output is designed to be a relatively straightforward process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    LambdaTest Inc.
    While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual testing plans are better priced than BrowserStack’s. In terms of UI and onboarding, we found LambdaTest more user-friendly as well.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    LambdaTest Inc.
    not all department, but we're using for our clients
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • It does not necessitate any further setup or configuration.
    • FitNess is an easy-to-use manual QA tool with a comprehensive report that aids stakeholders in better understanding the tested applications.
    • Automated testing suites for a wide range of websites. In addition, it is quite beneficial for the ongoing maintenance of the test library.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    LambdaTest Inc.
    • Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve
    • Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website.
    • Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    LambdaTest Screenshots

    Screenshot of an automated screenshotScreenshot of mobile-browser-testingScreenshot of automation testing on LambdatestScreenshot of some of the available integrations.Screenshot of real-time testingScreenshot of responsive testing