Fiserv Wealth Management Network vs. Mule ESB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Fiserv Wealth Management Network
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The Wealth Management Network from Fiserv is an expansive networks of managed account data and connectivity. It brings together asset managers and sponsors to perform all necessary business functions to support the industry. The Network includes messaging services, information exchange, and managed account data services.N/A
Mule ESB
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Mule ESB, from Mulesoft, is an open source middleware solution.N/A
Pricing
Fiserv Wealth Management NetworkMule ESB
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fiserv Wealth Management NetworkMule ESB
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Fiserv Wealth Management NetworkMule ESB
Best Alternatives
Fiserv Wealth Management NetworkMule ESB
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Boomi
Boomi
Score 8.9 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 7.8 out of 10
Enterprises
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
Score 8.0 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Fiserv Wealth Management NetworkMule ESB
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Fiserv Wealth Management NetworkMule ESB
Likelihood to Recommend
They offer almost every single thing a financial institution would need for their core business allows you to save quite a bit of money by bundling everything together. Fiserv has greatly increased the speed in which they roll out new banking product. From a banking software platform, they are the best in the business.
Read full review
Well Suited for:
  • REST APIs.
  • Rapid API Development.
  • Most suitable for integration with SFDC.
  • Batch processing.
  • Parallel processing.
Less appropriate for:
  • Integration with Database.
  • Exposing SOAP services.
  • Small organizations, because it is super costly.
Read full review
Pros
  • R&D is fantastic as they have the resources
  • Online resources to help figure things out
  • Easy to navigate
Read full review
  • As an ESB it provides great flexibility to add/remove systems in the integration easily. Highly scalable.
  • Supports any kind of system to be integrated, Supports Java.
  • Lightweight.
Read full review
Cons
  • Cost ... it's definitely not the cheapest option out there. the way pricing is itemized and a separate upcharge for each add-on gets annoying. They can probably bundle things a little better and offer a discount on the bundled products
  • the volume of system updates and changes is nauseating at times and we have to prepare and test accordingly every time there is a scheduled update. that takes up a lot of resources; quarterly updates to products would be much easier.
  • more responsive support and ideally more stable support engineers ... it seems like turnover is high in their support roles and that impacts customer success and MTTR.
Read full review
  • Logging the Database query in production with out changing the log4j level
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I can't name any other competitors that we considered because I have signed multiple NDAs that prohibit me from doing so. I can say that the decision to go with Fiserv WMN was in large part because we have other Fiserv Products and as a result, we already have a strong established relationship with Fiserv (and First Data for that matter, before they were acquired by Fiserv)
Read full review
Hands down, Mule is more cost-effective than Informatica, either on-prem or cloud, and the value only goes up form there. Reusability and ease of creation makes in-house training simple and the end result is we leverage Mule for much more than what we initially considered it for. Having used Oracle and TIBCO before as well, I find they are the tools of yesterday, not able to keep up in terms of functionality or price. Jitterbit would be a more relevant comparison, but Mule won out in the bake-off we did between them.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Speed of service is greatly improved across partners. I believe our MTTR for service requests has improved by 30-40%
  • Standardized platform for our staff which translates to better retention and a lower training effort.
  • Cost is the negative impact ... it goes without saying that using Fiserv is much more expensive to the manual alternative which is very human resource intensive but low cost. But that's to be expected ...we're just trading time for money.
Read full review
  • Created a means to have a synergy with developers - quickly made us productive
  • Ease of integration with Mule connectors - quicker releases
  • Initial configuration was a challenge. Would have been more challenging without Mule Support
Read full review
ScreenShots