Epicor Eclipse is an end-to-end business system for wholesale distributors, as well as electrical, HVAC, plumbing and PVF businesses. Eclipse simplifies complex distribution processes found in today’s dynamic supply chains.
N/A
Infor VISUAL
Score8 out of 10
N/A
Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.
Quality and Manufacturing Engineer in Quality Assurance at At home (Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing, 51-200 employees)
Chose Infor VISUAL
SAP Business One was selected for the China Division for cost and ease of training reasons. It does not have the capabilities required for the main office accounting or product engineering. It also was not available at the time of Visual Manufacturing selection. Epicor Eclipse …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Key User Insights
Would buy again
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Delivers good value for the price
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Happy with the feature set
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Lived up to sales and marketing promises
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Features
Epicor Eclipse
Infor VISUAL
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
8.5
3 Ratings
17% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
7.2
9 Ratings
5% below category average
Infor VISUAL
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
API for custom integration
7.87 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.79 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
7.8
14 Ratings
5% below category average
Infor VISUAL
9.0
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Single sign-on capability
8.09 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.514 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
6.6
16 Ratings
9% below category average
Infor VISUAL
4.0
3 Ratings
57% below category average
Dashboards
6.711 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Standard reports
6.416 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Custom reports
6.916 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
7.2
15 Ratings
7% below category average
Infor VISUAL
7.4
3 Ratings
4% below category average
Accounts payable
6.915 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.813 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Global Financial Support
7.17 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.26 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
7.310 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.38 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.710 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
7.1
17 Ratings
11% below category average
Infor VISUAL
8.0
4 Ratings
1% above category average
Inventory tracking
7.417 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Automatic reordering
6.715 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Location management
7.717 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
7.4
17 Ratings
6% below category average
Infor VISUAL
9.7
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Pricing
7.317 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Order entry
7.717 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.816 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.413 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
7.2
13 Ratings
4% below category average
Infor VISUAL
8.6
2 Ratings
14% above category average
Billing Management
6.911 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.48 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
7.36 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
6.15 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Period Close
7.511 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
5.7
9 Ratings
29% below category average
Infor VISUAL
7.2
1 Ratings
6% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
6.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
7.26 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
6.26 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
6.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
7.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
6.4
6 Ratings
7% below category average
Infor VISUAL
3.0
1 Ratings
78% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
6.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
5.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
6.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
8.0
2 Ratings
8% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
6.1
9 Ratings
13% below category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
5.16 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
6.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
4.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
6.94 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
6.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
4.5
4 Ratings
37% below category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
2.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
6.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
4.51 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
4.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
3.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
4.9
11 Ratings
31% below category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
4.36 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
4.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
4.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
6.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
6.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
5.0
3 Ratings
39% below category average
Infor VISUAL
3.2
2 Ratings
79% below category average
Production Process Design
4.52 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Production Management
5.73 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Configuration Management
6.41 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Work Execution
5.43 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
4.83 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor Eclipse
5.7
13 Ratings
22% below category average
Infor VISUAL
2.0
1 Ratings
112% below category average
Forecasting
6.112 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
6.611 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
5.69 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Epicor Eclipse and Infor VISUAL
Eclipse is well suited for quick order entry where the source is a formal purchase order document or a phone call with a known customer. In these scenarios the order entry process is quick, and order processing is smooth even if the customer has a lot of "special" requests like shipping part today and holding the rest or shipping some of the order to other addresses. Eclipse also works well if you have a good database of products, especially in searching for products where only partial information is known or finding existing orders where all you know for sure is the customer. It is not particularly well suited for Point of Sale where a walk-in customer who doesn't have an account wants products for which part numbers are not known, due to the requirements to release an order for a customer with no credit.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I struggle to identify a scenario where VISUAL is an appropriate solution. We used VISUAL because it was a legacy system and the cost/complexity of changeover seemed daunting. The user interface is poor as is the interconnectedness of the various screens and menus. This might be an acceptable piece of software for a continuous manufacturing environment with little variation of basic design, but we have had to write multiple add-on macros in order to get VISUAL to work effectively for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sales Order tracking, even returns are strengths of Epicor Eclipse. It can be set up to match returns to previous orders so that the correct credits are applied. It is capable of setting up contract pricing as well as matrix level pricing according to sales velocity or individual customer buyer programs.
Purchasing can be set up to work by full line buys or short buys while still maintaining a balanced inventory level of vendor line product.
Vendor Invoices and purchase orders are easily matched up for payment and the diverse reporting features are able to provide multi-faceted views of Product Sales, Items with No Sales, or Sales or Purchasing trends, just to name a few.
It is also tracking warehouse operation in both RF and non-RF environments, or a combination of the two.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Infor Visual has a standard way of addressing business operations: sales orders, invoicing, reporting. It is easy to train operators used to using a manual or other ERP system.
Material control is easy for production runs, R&D material lists and repairs. The process of receiving, issuing and returning material to inventory is facilitated by standard interfaces that are easily learned by material control operators.
Engineering changes to bills of material are facilitated by the "engineering Master" flexible editing capability. The version control for the BOM's can be as detailed or vague as the process designed dictates. One item of a BOM or the entire BOM can be changed quickly and approved for production that day.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
VTA has been extremely unreliable. I would not recommend it. It is not customizable at all. There is no logical way to handle shift differentials which is a huge issue with a company that runs 24/7.
If you do not have a schedule set up, they cannot clock in. This poses a problem for anyone that gets called in on a shift they don't normally work on.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I use it every day and can't see a reason why I would stop unless I started a new job. If I were to leave my present position, the new job would be much more attractive if they were Eclipse users.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks. Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation. Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management. Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well. "Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.
This is very easy to use for someone that hasn't ever used the system before. Despite any preconceived notions about how a system should function they can learn this and become efficient with really not a lot of effort. I have used many systems and this is probably one of the easiest I have ever had to learn to navigate and use.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I haven't experienced any outages in the two years I have been using the system. It is always available as long as the computer is up. The only time I have seen it not be available was on occasions where we lost internet, or power and then we lost access to everything, not just Epicor Eclipse.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Everything in this system moves fairly quickly, that may be in part because we are a small company with only 21 users on the system at a time, or it may just be a the way the Epicor Eclipse works for any size company with any number of users. I can only speak for what I know and say that it is fast for our purposes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The tier 1 support is trying, and sometimes they are successful. Sometimes they aren't. This topic isn't as black and white as the questions might suggest. Currently their Tier 1 support team is over seas, all items automatically go to Tier 1 and then when they can't help they either escalate it or tell me they need to check with someone else and they will get back to me. If they escalate me to Tier 2, then the issue comes back to the States and the support is usually at a higher knowledge/experience level and it can get resolved fairly quickly. If they don't escalate, then it might take weeks and multiple follow ups on my part before I either get a satisfactory resolution or finally get escalated.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The training classes that I have attended have been top notch. The presenters are extremely knowledgeable on their subject matter, including real-world application of the system. They aren't just software techs training end users, they seem to be end users that have become experts in the over functionality and capabilities of the system.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The on-line training is very good, and it is taught by the same people that do the live in-person training sessions. The difficult part of it is, asking questions about your specific company's nuances or special circumstances. I don't remember if you can access the on-line training sessions after you have taken them for reminders purposes, but if so that is a great asset.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I don't really know about the implementation, it was back in 1998 and I didn't start here until 2016. By the time I started here they had been running it for a number of years and most of the people that were here when it was implemented are no longer here, and the ones that are don't really have much to say about how the implementation went either bad or good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Most of my experience has been with Epicor's Prophet 21. For most distribution verticals, Prophet 21 is the only way to go. The comparison I've drawn is this: Prophet 21 is like a ferrari. Epicor Eclipse is like a reliable donkey. Both get you from point A to point B but Prophet 21 is going to get you there much quicker and with the kind of insight into your business that will help you thrive.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I don't really know about the scalability. It's the same as it was when I started, I do know that you can buy more user licenses, but I think they come in packs of 5, which can be a problem if you only need 1 and will never use the other 4. But, again I'm not sure on that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
One of the main positive ROI impacts has been the constant upgrading and adding of new features to keep the software user friendly, relative, and robust.
Our credit manager has said it has made their job easier with daily reports to catch pricing discrepancies and straighten out before they go to invoice makes us look better.
With the addition of sale analytics it has given our sales force tools and new approaches to our customer base which has raised profitability.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info