Engagedly is a cloud-based talent management platform for organizations. Engagedly supports performance management, engagement and employee learning, the Engagedly People + Strategy Platform is built to Execute on the user's strategy, Enable teams, and Engage people. The E3 suite consists of the following modules: EXECUTE: Performance Reviews OKRs and Goals 360 reviews 1:1s and Check Ins People Analytics Talent Mobility…
N/A
PeopleFluent
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.
N/A
Pricing
Engagedly
PeopleFluent
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Engagedly
PeopleFluent
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$1,000 one-time fee per installation (starting cost)
No setup fee
Additional Details
Pricing is customized based on the suite/modules implemented and the size of the organization
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Engagedly
PeopleFluent
Features
Engagedly
PeopleFluent
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly
8.1
Ratings
13% above category average
PeopleFluent
8.2
Ratings
14% above category average
Corporate goal setting
8.70 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
7.70 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
8.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Performance tracking
9.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly
8.0
Ratings
19% above category average
PeopleFluent
6.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Performance plans
9.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Plan weighting
8.00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Manager note taking
7.30 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
6.70 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Review status tracking
7.70 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
8.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Review reminders
8.30 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
9.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
9.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Reporting
7.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.0
Ratings
9% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.3
Ratings
9% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
9.5
Ratings
28% above category average
Job Requisition Management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Resume Management
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Candidate Search
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Collaboration
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Email Templates
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
User Permissions
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly has a huge range of possibilities and we chose it because of all the functionalities it offers. I'm not marking my rating a 9 or 10 because of the UI. If you're an active user (e.g. in the people department) then you get used to the UI fast enough. However, if you only use it twice per year (like all our other users) it can be difficult to find what you need. That being said, Engagedly offers a truly broad range of HR-related functionalities and we're very happy about that!
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
Goal setting: Ability to set individual OKRs, department, business unit, and top-level department OKRs; ability to align goals by level, ability to see goal hierarchy, and see how individuals making progress in their OKR impacts the overall company progress.
Performance reviews: ability to set cycle and customize each cycle, manage cycle at the same time or independently; ability to invite external reviewer (outside of the organization) is a huge benefit.
Learning: All learning courses can be hosted in the system and assigned to individuals or groups; ability to run reports
Analytics and reporting capability: the new interface improves this capability a lot. Data can be zoomed in and out and presented visually for employees and managers
Notifications - it would be better if individuals can customize what notifications to receive
Project review function - it would help if we can set up a review form that can be used any time of the year as many times as the reviewer want to use with more structure than the current feedback function (such as rating scale etc.)
It would be helpful if the mentor meeting function is included, not additional.
I would advise better filtering options when pulling up candidate profiles, we should have multiple functions when requesting candidates profile.
Sometimes I get huge projects and need to move more than 20 people, it's a headache moving groups in parts.
A faster way to verify if a candidate has been double submitted, maybe with a unique ID or email that identifies said candidate prior to going through the whole submission process.
Stronger cache cookies when session is timed out get kicked out and the process reboots. Sometimes recruiters are pulled in different directions while multitasking.
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
The reason I gave this rating as Engagedly shows us the tasks that are pending with the due date and also if the due date is nearing it sends us reminder emails to make sure we do not miss it. It is also helpful for new associates to know more about the organization hierarchy as documents are right shown on the home screen.
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
Absolutely! We love engagedly because we haven't faced any kind of lagging or such issues in website. It also has a convenient app through which you can access everything. They are very polite and address to each and every query relating to software which may cause hinderence in the process.
In my experience, the support team was very prompt and helpful. They had good subject matter expertise and were able to troubleshoot immediately. At times we wanted some enhancements but it was not possible due to product limitations. But, the support team was helpful in suggesting alternatives for our requirements. The customer support staff was also very polite and friendly.
the goal and review cycle alignment was superior to others. the price point was within our budget. And the employee recognition wasn't too over the top but also wasn't boring. we also looked at the clear company and a few others
Out of the VMS's listed, I'd say PeopleFluent is solidly in the middle. Fieldglass and IQN are probably easier to navigate and more modern looking, and I definitely don't run into the login problems with them. Beeline and PRO Wand are probably on par with PeopleFluent. They have their plusses and minuses in terms of navigation and ease of use. Covendis is definitely worse than PeopleFluent. Covendis is a mess - very difficult to navigate, not intuitive at all with terrible workflow. Again, I didn't select PeopleFluent; my client did, and I have chosen to work with them, therefore I work with PeopleFluent.
I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.