Ridder iQ vs. QAD Adaptive ERP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ridder iQ
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Ridder iQ is a manufacturing ERP, from ECI Software Solutions. Ridder iQ includes customer relationship management functionality that is fully integrated, and includes an integration with Outlook for email.N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…N/A
Pricing
Ridder iQQAD Adaptive ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ridder iQQAD Adaptive ERP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ridder iQQAD Adaptive ERP
Features
Ridder iQQAD Adaptive ERP
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
API for custom integration6.10 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Plug-ins5.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.9
Ratings
3% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Single sign-on capability7.70 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.3
Ratings
1% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
32% above category average
Dashboards7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standard reports6.40 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Custom reports8.40 Ratings10.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.4
Ratings
19% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
26% above category average
Accounts payable6.70 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.3
Ratings
16% above category average
Inventory tracking6.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering7.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location management5.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Pricing7.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Order entry7.70 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.60 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.7
Ratings
27% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Billing Management7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management4.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting4.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close5.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.5
Ratings
21% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools5.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.2
Ratings
28% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared4.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository4.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
4.8
Ratings
30% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Risk Repository4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments4.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection4.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Transportation Execution Management6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
2% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.2
Ratings
22% above category average
Production Process Design8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Production Management7.40 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Work Execution7.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs7.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
14% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.3
Ratings
15% above category average
Forecasting6.20 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Inventory Planning6.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring5.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.1
Ratings
16% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Proposal Management5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
33% above category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Ridder iQQAD Adaptive ERP
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Ridder iQQAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Ridder iQQAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
The best in the complete production process. It provides the correct info in a very usable way. It is pretty good in sales, but the lack of discounts for sales goods and sales production is not ideal. On the other hand, ECI provides an excellent service for looking for custom solutions where we need them. Dutch Translation: De beste in het complete productieproces. Het biedt de juiste informatie op een zeer bruikbare manier. Het is redelijk goed in de verkoop, maar het gebrek aan kortingen op verkoopartikelen en verkoopproductie is niet ideaal. Aan de andere kant biedt ECI een uitstekende service bij het zoeken naar maatwerkoplossingen waar we die nodig hebben. This review was originally written in English and has been translated into Dutch using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
Read full review
Suited very well for small to medium sized organizations as it provides you everything you can expect from an ERP (without any fancy bells and whistles that SAP and some of the other ERPs provide). Works well with a lean IT organization, as the configuration and ongoing maintenance and/or analysis is pretty straightforward.
Read full review
Pros
  • Flexibility in setting budgets for specific parts of a project
  • Insight in costs (journaldetails)(bookkeeping, however not Ridder financials)
  • Sending out offers and order confirmation
  • sending out purchase orders
  • Flexibiliteit bij het vaststellen van budgetten voor specifieke onderdelen van een project
  • Inzicht in kosten (journaalgegevens) (boekhouding, echter geen Ridder financials)
  • Het versturen van offertes en orderbevestigingen
  • het versturen van inkooporders
Read full review
  • The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
  • The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
  • The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
Read full review
Cons
  • The ability to copy item lines from receipts to a BOM
  • Adding photos to comment blocks in quotes makes the system slow. The photos are added in full size instead of asking for a small version.
  • De mogelijkheid om artikelregels van ontvangsten naar een stuklijst te kopiëren
  • Het toevoegen van foto's aan commentaarblokken tussen aanhalingstekens maakt het systeem traag. De foto's worden op volledige grootte toegevoegd in plaats van dat er om een ​​kleine versie wordt gevraagd.
Read full review
  • As a user and who managed the application, I have longed for a module that you don't have to go thru the entire frame to go to a certain field. They have addressed this issue on their recent release by going to a web frame.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Its nice software but it is very, very slow in webification and integration possibilities by using api's. Untill now the programm has client-server technology unfortunately. And there are far too less no code adjustments possible.
Read full review
The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
Read full review
Usability
Ridder iQ is friendly to use. With the use of roles we can give a very good user experience to our employees; they are more in control of their tasks. Since we use Ridder iQ, the right information is available for everybody in our organization, all on demand. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gebruiksvriendelijk. Door rollen te gebruiken, kunnen we onze medewerkers een zeer goede gebruikerservaring bieden; ze hebben meer controle over hun taken. Sinds we Ridder iQ gebruiken, is de juiste informatie voor iedereen binnen onze organisatie beschikbaar, direct beschikbaar.
Read full review
Easy to use, zero or minimum cost to maintain the database (DBA etc) , no issue with OS ( Linux), stable database
Read full review
Support Rating
Expert level of the support engineers is adequate. However in our opinion it does take a fair amount of time to respond
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
I didn't work here yet at the time of the implementation
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like ISAH. Therefore, the choice was an easy one, because knowledge and customizability are important criteria. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gespecialiseerd in onze branche en heeft mensen met veel kennis in huis. Ridder iQ is daarom veel geschikter dan een ERP-oplossing, die niet gespecialiseerd is in de maakindustrie. Bovendien onderscheidt Ridder iQ zich qua aanpasbaarheid ten opzichte van oplossingen zoals ISAH. De keuze was dan ook snel gemaakt, want kennis en aanpasbaarheid zijn belangrijke criteria.
Read full review
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Implement the business rules and forces them to be applied
  • SDK is used 90% for managing all order inputs and product BOM
  • The software tends to come to an halt for changes for on premise which is required of you have software/machines communicating to/from the ERP
  • Implementeer de bedrijfsregels en zorg ervoor dat ze worden toegepast
  • SDK wordt voor 90% gebruikt voor het beheren van alle orderinputs en product-BOM
  • De software loopt vaak vast bij wijzigingen voor on-premises, wat vereist dat u software/machines hebt die met het ERP communiceren
Read full review
  • ROI - very high with QAD.
  • Yearly maintenance cost is very low.
  • Support is very good from the QAD customer service team, knowledge base web site.
  • Very quick to implement the system.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Ridder iQ Screenshots

Screenshot of Ridder IQ combines the knowledge and practical experience gained since 1982 and is built on the latest software techniques such as .NET, C# and Microsoft SQL.Screenshot of Ridder IQ includes a complete CRM system with integration to Exchange and Outlook, purchase, sales, stock and time administration, as well as document management systems, integrated report designer and an authorization system.