Ridder iQ is a manufacturing ERP, from ECI Software Solutions. Ridder iQ includes customer relationship management functionality that is fully integrated, and includes an integration with Outlook for email.
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…
N/A
Pricing
Ridder iQ
QAD Adaptive ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ridder iQ
QAD Adaptive ERP
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ridder iQ
QAD Adaptive ERP
Features
Ridder iQ
QAD Adaptive ERP
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.0
17 Ratings
23% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
2 Ratings
27% above category average
API for custom integration
6.116 Ratings
9.92 Ratings
Plug-ins
5.914 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
8.0
19 Ratings
2% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Single sign-on capability
7.816 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.318 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.3
18 Ratings
1% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
3 Ratings
32% above category average
Dashboards
7.016 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Standard reports
6.517 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Custom reports
8.417 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.4
17 Ratings
19% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Accounts payable
6.717 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.917 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Global Financial Support
5.912 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
6.211 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.713 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
6.413 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.313 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
15 Ratings
24% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.3
4 Ratings
16% above category average
Inventory tracking
6.315 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Automatic reordering
7.113 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Location management
5.312 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.6
19 Ratings
3% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
4 Ratings
13% above category average
Pricing
7.919 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Order entry
7.718 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.319 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.617 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.7
15 Ratings
27% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Billing Management
7.415 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
6.113 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
4.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
4.712 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
5.614 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.5
13 Ratings
23% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
5.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
6.112 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
5.512 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.2
16 Ratings
28% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
5.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
5.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
4.47 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
5.810 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
4.9
7 Ratings
29% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
4.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
5.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
5.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
4.77 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.3
13 Ratings
6% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
6.412 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
6.312 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.6
18 Ratings
2% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.2
1 Ratings
21% above category average
Production Process Design
8.015 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Production Management
7.416 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.016 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Work Execution
7.516 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
7.316 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
15 Ratings
14% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.3
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Forecasting
6.212 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Inventory Planning
6.515 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
6.014 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.7
11 Ratings
22% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
5.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
6.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
The best in the complete production process. It provides the correct info in a very usable way. It is pretty good in sales, but the lack of discounts for sales goods and sales production is not ideal. On the other hand, ECI provides an excellent service for looking for custom solutions where we need them. Dutch Translation: De beste in het complete productieproces. Het biedt de juiste informatie op een zeer bruikbare manier. Het is redelijk goed in de verkoop, maar het gebrek aan kortingen op verkoopartikelen en verkoopproductie is niet ideaal. Aan de andere kant biedt ECI een uitstekende service bij het zoeken naar maatwerkoplossingen waar we die nodig hebben. This review was originally written in English and has been translated into Dutch using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
If you're setting up operations where you have to manage manufacturing builds from raw components to finished goods, I would recommend QAD. It's nice to have subassemblies part numbers for your builds and enter in the number of accepted quantities and rejects. QAD is very helpful if you have a lot of parts floating around. I would not buy QAD if you only have to manage less than ~20 parts... just use Excel.
The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
Needs more flexibility to add/configure new indexes (if using the Progress Database) as the current indexes on key tables like transaction history are not helpful
Need a better support system for the TMS/Precision interface
Need better KnowledgeBase articles to understand the innerds of Pricing functionality
Its nice software but it is very, very slow in webification and integration possibilities by using api's. Untill now the programm has client-server technology unfortunately. And there are far too less no code adjustments possible.
The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
The working environment can be perfectly designed for every user and department, which makes the user-friendliness very good. Adding columns, formatting tables can all be customized to the user. Dutch Translation: De werkomgeving is perfect in te richten voor elke gebruiker en afdeling, wat de gebruiksvriendelijkheid zeer hoog maakt. Het toevoegen van kolommen en het opmaken van tabellen is allemaal aanpasbaar aan de gebruiker.
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like ISAH. Therefore, the choice was an easy one, because knowledge and customizability are important criteria. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gespecialiseerd in onze branche en heeft mensen met veel kennis in huis. Ridder iQ is daarom veel geschikter dan een ERP-oplossing, die niet gespecialiseerd is in de maakindustrie. Bovendien onderscheidt Ridder iQ zich qua aanpasbaarheid ten opzichte van oplossingen zoals ISAH. De keuze was dan ook snel gemaakt, want kennis en aanpasbaarheid zijn belangrijke criteria.
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.