Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued vs. New Relic

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), also known as Dynatrace Network Application Monitoring (NAM), was an application monitoring solution focusing on user experience, with an emphasis on how the network – especially the WAN – influences user experience. It is a legacy product from Dynatrace, and is no longer sold or supported.N/A
New Relic
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
New Relic is a SaaS-based web and mobile application performance management provider for the cloud and the datacenter. They provide code-level diagnostics for dedicated infrastructures, the cloud, or hybrid environments and real time monitoring.
$0
No credit card required; 100 GB free ingest per month, 1 free full user + unlimited basic users, 8 days retention, 100 Synthetics Checks
Pricing
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinuedNew Relic
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free (Forever)
$0
No credit card required; 100 GB free ingest per month, 1 free full user + unlimited basic users, 8 days retention, 100 Synthetics Checks
Telemetry Data Platform
$0.25
per month per extra GB data ingest (after first free 100GB per month)
Incident Intelligence
$0.50
per month per event (after first 1000 free events per month)
Standard
$99
per month per full user (after first free full user - unlimited free basic users)
Pro
Contact sales team
Enterprise
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinuedNew Relic
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinuedNew Relic
Features
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinuedNew Relic
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued
7.2
Ratings
6% below category average
New Relic
-
Ratings
Application monitoring7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Database monitoring6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threshold alerts7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive capabilities8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application performance management console8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration tools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Virtualization monitoring6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinuedNew Relic
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.8 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.8 out of 10
NetBrain Technologies
NetBrain Technologies
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinuedNew Relic
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinuedNew Relic
Likelihood to Recommend
Dynatrace Network Application Monitoring (NAM), formerly DCRUM, has improved greatly compared to when it was DCRUM; however, it still needs a lot of improvement in end-to-end flow capture with regards to network monitoring. Its alerting and integration capabilities are very good and easy to use. But it still needs a lot of tweaking in usability.
Read full review
It is perfect for observing our energy platforms during high-load situations, such as grid demand spikes, or our real-time ingest of sensor data, allowing us to respond in real time to anomalies. And it’s a good way to monitor API performance in client dashboards, too. But it’s not as conducive for low-budget/low-code work or deep customization that doesn’t get ample development support given its complexity and expense.
Read full review
Pros
  • Dynatrace Network Application Monitoring (NAM), formerly DCRUM, is very useful to find the network packet flow across applications
  • It shows the application behavior in terms of end-user performance
  • It integrates very well with other Dynatrace components
Read full review
  • Capturing Front end Metrics specially web vitals and setting up alerts for violations really helps.
  • NRQL is great tool to fetch the data you need. With queries you can pull the data and put the data by table or by chart. You can even trend graphs and create dashboards.
  • Synthetic Monitoring is very helpful for proactive monitoring. You can use it for user journeys by using scripted browser monitor type or just check availability using PING type.
  • ASk AI is great addition that can fetch details you need with natuaral language
Read full review
Cons
  • Its configuration requires a lot of technical and business knowledge to drive monitoring expectations to dashboards.
  • DCRUM needs a robust monitoring architecture to store, analyze and visualize all collected data.
  • DCRUM can't monitor the latest Microsoft Exchange versions.
Read full review
  • Support for SQL like query with more functional features of analysis while viewing distributed tracing.
  • support for very low level specific integration from APIs to classes to functions to piece of code
  • More detailed documentation, as we faced issues while integrating for the first time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I have not yet found any similar product that offers me this range of features to help us keep our online service fast and reliable. Besides this, New Relic is constantly evolving by adding new plugins to emerging technologies and platforms. Server performance measuring features are a key point as our user database grows.
Read full review
Usability
Best of breed.
Read full review
New Relic helps in observability setup for the critical environments and getting known about the issues and troubleshoot the applications and services. Alerts helps in knowing the abnormal state of the system and services, Dashboards are used for visualizing the key metrics and muting the unwanted notifications and dropping the extra data from the source.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Never observed an outage
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Always responsive. Never observed slow page loads
Read full review
Support Rating
The only thing missing for a 10, would be if they texted or called you back.
Read full review
The support team has been really helpful and resolved most of the issues on time. However, for a couple of issues, several follow-ups were needed to elicit a reasonable response. The issue was deeply technical and could have been investigated only by their Architects, and bringing them into the ticket took longer than needed
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The documentation was clear and concise; the only issue we ran into was custom application naming. Due to HTTPD mod_fcgid and the need for the application name to be set in php.ini (not in .htaccess or the virtual host directive) ... we had issues setting this up.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Nagios can't trace real user transactions from a front-end tier through a backend-tier,;with Nagios you only can monitor server availability and hardware issues. Riverbed is commonly used to determine networking issues without considering real user transactions impact on an application stack.
Read full review
Its covers all the observability aspects as well as giving us more competitive pricing models compared to other providers that's why I like to use New Relic in place of other tools. And also it introduces new Agentic AI features as well as it adopts AI in its RCA. As an observability tool it should reduce the RCA of any problem and New Relic is continuously focusing on that that's why I am preferring New Relic in place of other tools.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Agent deployment is easily integrated into our workflow. Adding the agent to new servers is quick and painless
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has reduced the number of war rooms as well as the number of people involved to address issues.
  • It helps in utilization trending for network capacity.
  • It has prevented poor solutions from hitting production.
  • When the various business units launch own initiatives such as third party tools or new platforms, it's become extremly easy to detect.
  • The reports help in the field of continuous improvement as any changes are immediately discovered and can be compared to history. Deviations from what you have decided as a tolerance corridor can be used to trigger alarms, both positive and negative.
Read full review
  • We were able to quickly identify our most time consuming APIs. In some cases we were able to bring down times for some apis from 4s to 200ms.
  • We were able to identify our slowest database queries and optimize them for quicker response times.
Read full review
ScreenShots