Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), also known as Dynatrace Network Application Monitoring (NAM), was an application monitoring solution focusing on user experience, with an emphasis on how the network – especially the WAN – influences user experience. It is a legacy product from Dynatrace, and is no longer sold or supported.
N/A
ManageEngine Applications Manager
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
ManageEngine Applications Manager is an application performance management solution that also provides the ability to manage end user experience of enterprise Internet Services and hosted Web Services.
$395
per year per user
Pricing
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued
ManageEngine Applications Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional Edition
$395
per year per user
Enterprise Edition
$9,595
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued
ManageEngine Applications Manager
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued
ManageEngine Applications Manager
Features
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued
ManageEngine Applications Manager
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued
7.2
Ratings
6% below category average
ManageEngine Applications Manager
9.2
Ratings
19% above category average
Application monitoring
7.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Database monitoring
6.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Threshold alerts
7.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Predictive capabilities
8.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Application performance management console
8.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Collaboration tools
8.00 Ratings
9.90 Ratings
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding
8.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Virtualization monitoring
6.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring
7.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting
7.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery
7.00 Ratings
9.90 Ratings
User Ratings
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued
Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued
ManageEngine Applications Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
Dynatrace Network Application Monitoring (NAM), formerly DCRUM, has improved greatly compared to when it was DCRUM; however, it still needs a lot of improvement in end-to-end flow capture with regards to network monitoring. Its alerting and integration capabilities are very good and easy to use. But it still needs a lot of tweaking in usability.
Managed Engine Applications Manager excels in monitoring virtual machine databases and general system health. However, it isn't designed for monitoring items like UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supply) systems. Its strengths lie in optimizing IT infrastructure, while UPS monitoring would be better suited to managed engine opsmanager.
For the the trust, security and support that ManageEngine Application Manager has given us, for 12 years as clients, has made us very satisfied and grateful for the response times to resolve doubts or needs that we have had.
The intuitive ease of the administration interface, the new features, improvements and security fixes that are quickly integrated with frequent updates. Tuning or more detailed reports associated with attributes of services, applications or containers that help us detect certain flaws in our services. The capacity for improvements that are implemented and the ease of integrating new monitors into the product, which we need, gives us the speed and ease of preventing interruptions or events that helps us avoid.
The trust, security and support that ManageEngine Application Manager has given us, for 12 years as clients, has made us very satisfied and grateful for the response times to resolve doubts or needs that we have had.
Nagios can't trace real user transactions from a front-end tier through a backend-tier,;with Nagios you only can monitor server availability and hardware issues. Riverbed is commonly used to determine networking issues without considering real user transactions impact on an application stack.
Other solutions like Microsoft EM and SCCM can be interdependent and cause all sorts of issues and additional costs. I think software should be optionally integrated and work on its own as a standalone solution. I like that ManageEngine allows for specific use of its software and not forcing users into an unneeded license or contract.
It has reduced the number of war rooms as well as the number of people involved to address issues.
It helps in utilization trending for network capacity.
It has prevented poor solutions from hitting production.
When the various business units launch own initiatives such as third party tools or new platforms, it's become extremly easy to detect.
The reports help in the field of continuous improvement as any changes are immediately discovered and can be compared to history. Deviations from what you have decided as a tolerance corridor can be used to trigger alarms, both positive and negative.
By providing valuable insights into application performance and resource utilization, it has contributed to better decision-making and resource allocation.
It has helped us identify and resolve performance issues more quickly, minimizing the impact on business operations.
ManageEngine Application Manager has improved our ability to monitor and manage critical applications, reducing downtime and improving overall productivity.