Symantec Email Threat Detection and Response vs. Cyberark Secrets Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Symantec Email Threat Detection and Response
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Symantec email threat detection and response, from Broadcom, is a software solution designed to protect against the most sophisticated email threats and gain comprehensive insights into targeted & advanced email attacks.N/A
Cyberark Secrets Manager
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Cyberark Secrets Manager (formerly Conjur) is used to securely authenticate, control and audit non-human access across tools, applications, containers and cloud environments via a secrets management software solution.N/A
Pricing
Symantec Email Threat Detection and ResponseCyberark Secrets Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Symantec Email Threat Detection and ResponseCyberark Secrets Manager
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Symantec Email Threat Detection and ResponseCyberark Secrets Manager
User Ratings
Symantec Email Threat Detection and ResponseCyberark Secrets Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(3 ratings)
9.9
(2 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Symantec Email Threat Detection and ResponseCyberark Secrets Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
Broadcom
I have had a suitation where the company domain was being blasted by tons of spam emails and the Symantec Email Threat Detection stood to the test and block all these harmful email from entering our users mailbox, for a less appropriate scenario would be the frequency of the false positives that are reported that I have to train the tool how to allow these traffic to pass.
Read full review
Cyberark
Cyberark Conjur is well-suited and includes the following: > Securing access to sensitive data in multi-cloud environments. > Providing secure access to secrets and credentials for 3rd party services and applications
Read full review
Pros
Broadcom
  • Scans computers for viruses
  • Notifies admins of infections
  • Good licensing process
Read full review
Cyberark
  • Provide allow-list
  • verifying authority
  • validate access
Read full review
Cons
Broadcom
  • Adding malicious sources taking time
  • Reporting function is very basic
  • Symantec ATP has no integration with Symantec ETDAD.
Read full review
Cyberark
  • Searching containers can be difficult if you're not sure which you're looking for.
  • Initial authorization can be slow, specifically if the first instance failed.
Read full review
Usability
Broadcom
Symantec Email Threat Detection and Response is a treadsetter, it has great features and works well overall
Read full review
Cyberark
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Broadcom
We are making a migration from Symantec to SentinelOne in the near future for easier deployment, better EDR and management functionality.
Read full review
Cyberark
Cyberark Conjur has been a great asset to our company as it is a one stop shop that holds individuals, teams, departments, and the entire company accountable for the safety network. Not only do you have to be authorized to access Cyberark Conjuryou have to reauthorize to open, copy, or see individual passwords or accounts leaving a cyber trace of all your actions. There's no way to accidently get into something you're not supposed to be in.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Broadcom
  • Integration with ETDAD will make Symantec ATP more powerful for future AD threats
  • Implemeting Symantec ATP was easy and took little time
Read full review
Cyberark
  • Before Cyberark we put passwords in a spread sheet - leaving exposure to theft.
  • Gives security compliance to our company
  • Keeps company and teams secure and safe.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cyberark Secrets Manager Screenshots

Screenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UI