CoSchedule provides a content calendar, content optimization, and contentmarketing products, with users among 50,000 marketers worldwide, helping them organize their work, deliver projects on time, and prove marketing team value.
N/A
Piano Amplifier
Score 5.6 out of 10
N/A
A solution to amplify content with AI-powered social publishing. Used to grow and engage an audience through real-time data and machine-learning optimization, guiding users to content, and to just the right place in the social conversation.
Socialflow was acquired by Piano in 2022, and is now a Piano solution.
N/A
Pricing
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Piano Amplifier
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Piano Amplifier
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Piano Amplifier
Features
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Piano Amplifier
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
7.3
Ratings
10% below category average
Piano Amplifier
-
Ratings
Ideation
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content collaboration
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content calendar
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
10.0
Ratings
21% above category average
Piano Amplifier
-
Ratings
Content distribution
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content promotion
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content automation
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
10.0
Ratings
24% above category average
Piano Amplifier
-
Ratings
Closed-loop tracking and reporting
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content performance analytics
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Listening/monitoring
Comparison of Listening/monitoring features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
-
Ratings
Piano Amplifier
5.0
Ratings
43% below category average
Boolean keyword searches
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Filtering out noise/spam
00 Ratings
4.60 Ratings
Sentiment analysis
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Broad channel coverage
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Publishing
Comparison of Publishing features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
-
Ratings
Piano Amplifier
5.1
Ratings
45% below category average
Content planning and scheduling
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Audience targeting
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Content optimization
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Workflow management
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Engagement
Comparison of Engagement features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
-
Ratings
Piano Amplifier
5.0
Ratings
45% below category average
Automated routing and prioritization
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Customer interaction histories
00 Ratings
4.60 Ratings
Bulk actions
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Marketing
Comparison of Marketing features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
-
Ratings
Piano Amplifier
5.1
Ratings
41% below category average
Lead generation
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Content marketing
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Paid media management
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Campaigns and promotions
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Channel coverage/integration
Comparison of Channel coverage/integration features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
-
Ratings
Piano Amplifier
5.7
Ratings
39% below category average
Twitter
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Facebook
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
LinkedIn
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Google+
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Instagram
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Pinterest
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
YouTube
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Reporting/analytics
Comparison of Reporting/analytics features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
-
Ratings
Piano Amplifier
5.1
Ratings
43% below category average
Campaign success analytics
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Real-time tracking
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Competitor analysis
00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Account management
Comparison of Account management features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule does more than just content planning, it helps you organize your content, betters your content with headline analyzers, and allows you to organize your work and marketing calendars as well. If your organization is in a spot where you need a well-rounded tool to help with content, marketing, or even task organization, CoSchedule might be the right fit.
SocialFlow is good on paper but in my personal experience it is clunky, doesn’t do what you want it to, and their support team doesn’t take your issues seriously. I wouldn’t recommend this if you work on tight timeframes as it has a scattergun approach to posting on Facebook. I would like to think that my experiences are due to me not having thorough training, but I am not sure if this is the case.
Unique algorithm does not just 'time' posts, it helps determine the optimal time for posts to be distributed. Its why all the major publishers like NYT, WSJ, Conde Nast, Mashable, etc. use SocialFlow to distribute its social content.
Dashboard gives insight into which posts perform best.
It's streamlined and simple and not overly or unnecessarily feature-laden.
The import Google Doc to WordPress functionality never worked successfully or reliably for me. So I just manually copy and paste Google Docs to the WordPress editor instead.
The social sharing counter was not that helpful, because it only counted Facebook and Google+. Who uses Google+ anymore? Plus, now they don't even show the social counter in the monthly calendar view. so you can't see the numbers without doing some extra digging.
In the monthly calendar view, some titles get cut off if they don't wrap cleanly in the day's box. So I would make it look cleaner instead of having words broken up by a hyphen.
The interface is very intuitive, from setting up social profiles, to posting, to tags, to optimizing for best day/time to post. It's super easy to scan the aggregate analytics. The calendar is very easy to grok at a glance, and the more advanced functionality is intuitive to set up.
I give this rating as an outcome to understand competitor social strategy to improve strategic positioning. Drive improvement by benchmarking and serving to compete on content Identify trends, topics/themes, potential threats, etc. Improve campaigns by measuring and comparing audience reach, Interaction, etc. Measure engagement rate to analyze audience association. What themes/topics are generating higher engagement Insights to assist marketing teams in planning future campaigns
I didn't have to use their official support, but I can say that they put out a lot of content online to help users. Their YouTube page has quite an array of tutorial videos explaining how things work and how to get the most out of their tools. If you're struggling, before picking up a phone or blasting off an email, try searching for your problem on YouTube or their forums.
I give this rating as overall support for Social footprint analysis to identify and benchmark the competitor's social presence. Extraction of retrospective data from identified social channels. Complex query building with defined subsets of keywords to gauge social buzz. Analysis of historic datasets with a detailed classification that offered insights into the marketing efforts and messaging patterns.
CoSchedule is definitely a more powerful marketing tool than Loomly or Buffer, which are more dedicated to straight social media scheduling. I preview the calendar overview offered by CoSchedule, which makes it easy to see everything at a glance. PromoRepublic is similar but has the added Canva-type integration, which makes it more appealing to our clients who want to be able to easily put together their own images. CoSchedule is a bit pricy, which can be prohibitive for clients who don't pay in dollars.
SocialFlow stacks up against others by : 1. Event registrations, participation and promotions, companies highlighting their sessions, speakers, and delegations of different countries drove the event-specific volumes 2. Using Twitter as the primary platform and mainly constituted mentions around registrations, participations, promotions of sessions/panels, and opinions on the same 3. Discussions around the event’s annual themes, the new ‘Davos Manifesto’ and posts expressing delight for being invited, participation confirmations, and comments on different sessions/panel promotions drove the positive coverage 4. During-Event and Post-Event periods saw companies shift their focus to highlight sessions and panel discussions aligned more toward business-driven themes