ContractZen's Governance Cloud for SMBs features a board portal, entity management, contract management, virtual data rooms (VDR), and more – powered by AI. ContractZen was built to speed up operations, minimize risks, and maximize company value in due diligence situations.
$9.50
per month (billed annually) per user
Oracle CPQ
Score 1.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.
$240
per month per user
Pricing
ContractZen
Oracle CPQ
Editions & Modules
Standard
$9.50
per month (billed annually) per user
Advanced
$27
per month (billed annually) per user (5 user minimum)
Custom
Contact Sales
for large organizations with over 50 users
CPQ Pricing
$240.00
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ContractZen
Oracle CPQ
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
ContractZen offers a Custom Plan designed for organizations with more than 50 users. This plan includes all features from the Advanced Plan, with the added benefit of customization to meet any specific business needs.
Pricing follows a user-based licensing model, where fees are calculated per user and billed annually.
The pricing for the Custom Plan is determined based on the size, requirements, and scope of the organization. ContractZen works with each customer to tailor the plan to best fit their governance and compliance needs.
ContractZen can be set up independently through the ContractZen website, Microsoft AppSource, or Azure Marketplace. Every new account includes a 30-day free trial with full access to all features—no credit card required.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ContractZen
Oracle CPQ
Features
ContractZen
Oracle CPQ
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
ContractZen
8.3
Ratings
0% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Contract database
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract search
9.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom contract reports
5.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Product A and Product B
This is a big step up from our use of an Excel spreadsheet to manage hundreds of clients. There is more functionality in the product than we are currently using. It would be useful to learn from others how they are using the tool as we might discover some improved efficiency that we haven't considered.
I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
Advanced coding for some areas in config and pricing engine are written in BML. This Java-like code may be a bit tricky for someone trying to write very advanced configuration rules or advanced pricing.
The flagship system needs to have an easier way to enter in pricing. In the BMX version, pricing is handled through multiple matricies, but in the flagship it is compiled into one ugly rule.
Customization. Other software comes with tools to help customize the "look and feel" quickly. To get a re-vamped look on the flagship product, you'll need a CSS expert.
So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
While they have a decent administrator interface (relative to other apps), the part that is unintuitive is the printer friendly output. I view this is as the meat and potatoes. They are very constrained on these abilities. To make a font change is really cumbersome. There is no content management protocol to protocol. This kills us.
It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
The capture of the new contracts is more important than the old contracts, somewhat counterintuitively. Once you start saving time using the electronic signing and retrieval, adding old material is easier. Old material additions fit our annual schedule as we've done them during periods of less administrative work.
Like with any implementation go into it with a clear and realistic plan for getting the implementation completed and it will go much smoother. BigMachines has a clear process and an excellent staff fort getting an implementation completed we just needed to follow more of it instead of creating our own roadblocks
The barrier of entry with ContractZen was so low. Competition offered a paid proof-of-concept, multiple sales call, and pre-sales analysis for which we had no time and had low interest. ContractZen gave us a demo in 30 minutes, gave me an account and walked me through the product. The cost was significantly lower. Yes, features were fewer in ContractZen but the features were the right ones we needed. Security of the system was adequate and it was cloud-based, which meant we didn't have to maintain servers on premise. Onboarding was easy and describing the system to others to get buy-in was exceptionally easy.
We debated a few different options, including a home-grown custom program, uCommerce, and just using only Oracle Commerce Cloud. Since we had already decided to use Oracle Commerce Cloud over uCommerce, the integrations available between OCC, Oracle's ERP system, and Oracle CPQ definitely seemed like the easiest option with the greatest benefits. However, the cost/benefit of Oracle CPQ was more apparent when we were ready to launch more complex configurations across all of our product groups.
Sales Operations or IT would have a better understanding of the license user costs and ROI. I do know that Sales has experienced frustrations in the the lead gen-to-close process and have experienced delays with some deals. In other instances, the software has worked fine. I would love to see an analysis on how our lead-conversion rate, sales cycles, and proposal volume stacks up.
